Ohio State Buckeyes
Next: vs C Michigan · Thu 5 Nov, 6:30 PM ETProjected 90-47 · Game page
Makes the tournament99%From 20,000 simulated seasons · average seed 2.8
Wins the national title4%Final Four 24% · projected 27-6
Net rating+38.3Rank 5 of 363 · offence 10, defence 3
Season outlook
- Projected record
- 27-6 (23 to 31 wins)
- Projected conference record
- 14-4
- Wins or shares the conference title
- 22%
- Wins the conference tournament
- 17%
- Average seed if in the field
- 2.8
- A 1 seed
- 26%
- Makes the field99%
- Round of 3296%
- Sweet 1679%
- Elite Eight48%
- Final Four24%
- Title game11%
- Champion4%
Schedule and results
| Date | Opponent | Where | Win chance | Projected | Result | Pick |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mon 2 Nov | vs UICrank 202 | Home | 100% | 101-63 | W 81-34 | Right |
| Thu 5 Nov6:30 PM ET | vs Central Michiganrank 191 | Home | 100% | 90-47 | — | |
| Sun 8 Nov1 PM ET | vs Mercyhurstrank 319 | Home | 100% | 96-42 | — | |
| Thu 12 Nov6:30 PM ET | vs UConnrank 1 | Home | 31% | 69-75 | — |
Rooting guide
- Thu 12 Nov: vs UConnA win: 33% · a loss: 23%+10 pts
Early in the season other teams' results barely move a team's chances, so the list is mostly its own games; by February the bubble and conference races make other games matter.
Players
| Player | Games | Minutes | Points | Rebounds | Assists | Rating | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kennedy CambridgeG | 1 | 29.0 | 10.0 | 6.0 | 2.0 | +10.2 | +6.7 |
| Jaloni CambridgeG | 1 | 28.0 | 22.0 | 9.0 | 3.0 | +13.0 | +8.0 |
| Ava WatsonG | 1 | 26.0 | 6.0 | 2.0 | 4.0 | +7.3 | +4.6 |
| Kylee KittsG | 1 | 24.0 | 7.0 | 9.0 | 2.0 | +8.1 | +4.6 |
| Elsa LemmilaC | 1 | 21.0 | 15.0 | 11.0 | 2.0 | +10.7 | +5.1 |
| Adriana DiazF | 1 | 19.0 | 2.0 | 3.0 | 2.0 | +1.6 | +1.3 |
| Bryn MartinG | 1 | 18.0 | 5.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | +7.0 | +3.1 |
| Sydney MobleyF | 1 | 16.0 | 14.0 | 3.0 | 0.0 | +1.7 | +1.2 |
| Seini HenryG | 1 | 10.0 | 0.0 | 5.0 | 0.0 | +6.3 | +1.6 |
| Atlee VaneskoG | 1 | 9.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | +1.8 | +0.7 |
Style and luck
Every teamThe Four Factors adjusted for opponents
| Offence | Defence | League | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ShootingEffective FG% · decides 44% of the margin | 44.3%rank 257 | 42.3%rank 13 | 44.7% |
| TurnoversTurnover rate · decides 27% of the margin | 23.7%rank 135 | 25.3%rank 34 | 23.8% |
| Offensive reboundsRebound rate · decides 20% of the margin | 36.7%rank 5 | 34.5%rank 290 | 33.5% |
| Free throwsFree throws per FG attempt · decides 9% of the margin | 19.4%rank 280 | 18.7%rank 40 | 20.4% |
Defence is what opponents managed. For turnovers a high defence figure is good; for the others, low is good.
Luck so far
- Wins against the pre-game chances
- 1.0 won, 1.0 expected (0.0)
- Opponents' three-point shooting
- +11.0 points a game (they shot 10.0%, league 28.4%)
- Opponents' free throws
- −0.6 points a game
- Close games: by 5 or fewer, or overtime
- None yet
Opponents' three-point shooting repeats little from one half of a season to the other (correlation 0.17), and their free throws even less (0.22), so a team living off either is likely to come back toward average. Positive numbers mean the luck has helped.
Rating this season
- Preseason net rating
- +35.3
- Last season's net rating
- +33.7
- Last season's minutes returning
- 76%
- Transfers in, weighted by minutes
- 0.0
- Change since preseason
- +3.0
- Offence, points per 100 possessions
- 111.8 (rank 10)
- Defence, points allowed per 100
- 73.5 (rank 3)
- Tempo, possessions per 40 minutes
- 75.2 (rank 33)
- Schedule so far, opponents' average
- −6.8 (rank 166)
Big Ten Conference by rating
| # | Team | Record | Conference | Net | Offence | Defence | National rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Michigan | 0-0 | 0-0 | +43.9 | 115.7 | 71.8 | 3 |
| 2 | Ohio State | 1-0 | 0-0 | +38.3 | 111.8 | 73.5 | 5 |
| 3 | Minnesota | 1-0 | 0-0 | +35.9 | 114.3 | 78.4 | 7 |
| 4 | UCLA | 1-0 | 0-0 | +34.4 | 109.9 | 75.5 | 11 |
| 5 | Illinois | 1-0 | 0-0 | +33.4 | 112.1 | 78.7 | 13 |
| 6 | Iowa | 1-0 | 0-0 | +32.0 | 109.8 | 77.8 | 14 |
| 7 | USC | 1-0 | 0-0 | +31.5 | 109.3 | 77.9 | 15 |
| 8 | Oregon | 1-0 | 0-0 | +29.7 | 107.8 | 78.1 | 18 |
| 9 | Maryland | 0-1 | 0-0 | +28.8 | 112.0 | 83.2 | 21 |
| 10 | Washington | 1-0 | 0-0 | +26.6 | 105.4 | 78.8 | 24 |
| 11 | Michigan State | 1-0 | 0-0 | +23.9 | 104.2 | 80.3 | 28 |
| 12 | Nebraska | 1-0 | 0-0 | +23.3 | 105.0 | 81.7 | 30 |
| 13 | Indiana | 1-0 | 0-0 | +18.4 | 102.0 | 83.6 | 41 |
| 14 | Wisconsin | 1-0 | 0-0 | +12.9 | 102.3 | 89.5 | 67 |
| 15 | Rutgers | 2-0 | 0-0 | +9.1 | 96.0 | 87.0 | 83 |
| 16 | Purdue | 1-0 | 0-0 | +5.7 | 96.9 | 91.2 | 97 |
| 17 | Northwestern | 1-0 | 0-0 | +4.3 | 94.8 | 90.5 | 103 |
| 18 | Penn State | 0-1 | 0-0 | +0.9 | 92.8 | 91.9 | 132 |