Duke Blue Devils
Makes the tournament>99%From 20,000 simulated seasons · average seed 1.8
Wins the national title16%Final Four 41% · projected 31-4
Net rating+33.5Rank 1 of 365 · offence 2, defence 1
Season outlook
- Projected record
- 31-4 (27 to 34 wins)
- Projected conference record
- 16-2
- Wins or shares the conference title
- 81%
- Wins the conference tournament
- 61%
- Average seed if in the field
- 1.8
- A 1 seed
- 59%
- Makes the field>99%
- Round of 3298%
- Sweet 1681%
- Elite Eight60%
- Final Four41%
- Title game26%
- Champion16%
Schedule and results
| Date | Opponent | Where | Win chance | Projected | Result | Pick |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mon 2 Nov | vs Armyrank 301 | Home | 100% | 88-48 | W 84-50 | Right |
| Thu 5 Nov8 PM ET | vs Coastal Carolinarank 257 | Home | 100% | 92-54 | — | |
| Tue 10 Nov7 PM ET | vs Michigan Staterank 8 | Neutral | 65% | 76-72 | — |
Rooting guide
- Tue 10 Nov: vs Michigan StateA win: 63% · a loss: 52%+11 pts
Early in the season other teams' results barely move a team's chances, so the list is mostly its own games; by February the bubble and conference races make other games matter.
Players
| Player | Games | Minutes | Points | Rebounds | Assists | Rating | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Patrick Ngongba IIC | 1 | 24.0 | 10.0 | 7.0 | 1.0 | +11.5 | +5.7 |
| John BlackwellG · transfer from Wisconsin | 1 | 24.0 | 3.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | +9.2 | +4.8 |
| Dame SarrF | 1 | 21.0 | 16.0 | 4.0 | 3.0 | +8.5 | +3.9 |
| Caleb FosterG | 1 | 20.0 | 4.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | +8.5 | +3.7 |
| Cayden BoozerG | 1 | 20.0 | 9.0 | 3.0 | 3.0 | +9.4 | +4.0 |
| Deron Rippey Jr.G | 1 | 20.0 | 7.0 | 2.0 | 4.0 | +2.7 | +1.7 |
| Sebastian WilkinsF | 1 | 19.0 | 6.0 | 2.0 | 1.0 | +2.7 | +1.6 |
| Joaquim Boumtje BoumtjeC | 1 | 19.0 | 15.0 | 7.0 | 0.0 | +2.8 | +1.6 |
| Cameron WilliamsF | 1 | 11.0 | 4.0 | 3.0 | 0.0 | +2.9 | +1.0 |
| Bryson HowardG | 1 | 10.0 | 4.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | +2.9 | +0.9 |
| Drew ScharnowskiF · transfer from Belmont | 1 | 8.0 | 4.0 | 2.0 | 1.0 | +9.4 | +1.6 |
| Maxime MeyerC | 1 | 4.0 | 2.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | +3.1 | +0.4 |
Style and luck
Every teamThe Four Factors adjusted for opponents
| Offence | Defence | League | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ShootingEffective FG% · decides 44% of the margin | 49.9%rank 252 | 50.0%rank 113 | 50.4% |
| TurnoversTurnover rate · decides 25% of the margin | 19.0%rank 278 | 20.7%rank 3 | 18.6% |
| Offensive reboundsRebound rate · decides 21% of the margin | 33.0%rank 56 | 32.0%rank 258 | 31.7% |
| Free throwsFree throws per FG attempt · decides 10% of the margin | 26.6%rank 62 | 23.6%rank 60 | 25.2% |
Defence is what opponents managed. For turnovers a high defence figure is good; for the others, low is good.
Luck so far
- Wins against the pre-game chances
- 1.0 won, 1.0 expected (0.0)
- Opponents' three-point shooting
- +5.1 points a game (they shot 26.7%, league 32.3%)
- Opponents' free throws
- +0.2 points a game
- Close games: by 5 or fewer, or overtime
- None yet
Opponents' three-point shooting repeats little from one half of a season to the other (correlation 0.21), and their free throws even less (0.18), so a team living off either is likely to come back toward average. Positive numbers mean the luck has helped.
Rating this season
- Preseason net rating
- +33.8
- Last season's net rating
- +38.4
- Last season's minutes returning
- 43%
- Transfers in, weighted by minutes
- +3.5
- Change since preseason
- −0.3
- Offence, points per 100 possessions
- 121.9 (rank 2)
- Defence, points allowed per 100
- 88.4 (rank 1)
- Tempo, possessions per 40 minutes
- 70.4 (rank 295)
- Schedule so far, opponents' average
- −13.8 (rank 235)
Atlantic Coast Conference by rating
| # | Team | Record | Conference | Net | Offence | Defence | National rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Duke | 1-0 | 0-0 | +33.5 | 121.9 | 88.4 | 1 |
| 2 | Louisville | 1-0 | 0-0 | +21.8 | 117.0 | 95.2 | 18 |
| 3 | Virginia | 1-0 | 0-0 | +20.2 | 115.0 | 94.8 | 28 |
| 4 | Miami | 0-1 | 0-0 | +20.1 | 116.0 | 95.9 | 31 |
| 5 | North Carolina | 1-0 | 0-0 | +15.6 | 113.7 | 98.1 | 44 |
| 6 | Clemson | 1-0 | 0-0 | +14.6 | 114.4 | 99.7 | 53 |
| 7 | Florida State | 1-0 | 0-0 | +14.3 | 113.9 | 99.6 | 54 |
| 8 | Notre Dame | 1-0 | 0-0 | +13.2 | 111.7 | 98.5 | 58 |
| 9 | NC State | 1-0 | 0-0 | +12.7 | 112.5 | 99.8 | 62 |
| 10 | Syracuse | 1-0 | 0-0 | +11.1 | 111.5 | 100.4 | 67 |
| 11 | SMU | 1-0 | 0-0 | +10.6 | 110.9 | 100.3 | 73 |
| 12 | Stanford | 1-0 | 0-0 | +10.2 | 111.4 | 101.2 | 76 |
| 13 | Virginia Tech | 1-0 | 0-0 | +9.6 | 109.0 | 99.4 | 79 |
| 14 | Pittsburgh | 1-0 | 0-0 | +7.6 | 107.9 | 100.3 | 88 |
| 15 | Georgia Tech | 1-0 | 0-0 | +7.6 | 106.1 | 98.5 | 89 |
| 16 | Wake Forest | 1-0 | 0-0 | +7.5 | 108.6 | 101.2 | 90 |
| 17 | California | 2-0 | 0-0 | +4.5 | 107.1 | 102.6 | 105 |
| 18 | Boston College | 1-0 | 0-0 | +3.9 | 105.4 | 101.5 | 109 |