Michigan State Spartans
Makes the tournament95%From 20,000 simulated seasons · average seed 3.4
Wins the national title4%Final Four 18% · projected 26-8
Net rating+27.6Rank 8 of 365 · offence 9, defence 9
Season outlook
- Projected record
- 26-8 (21 to 30 wins)
- Projected conference record
- 14-6
- Wins or shares the conference title
- 23%
- Wins the conference tournament
- 18%
- Average seed if in the field
- 3.4
- A 1 seed
- 21%
- Makes the field95%
- Round of 3288%
- Sweet 1660%
- Elite Eight34%
- Final Four18%
- Title game9%
- Champion4%
Schedule and results
| Date | Opponent | Where | Win chance | Projected | Result | Pick |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mon 2 Nov | vs Quinnipiacrank 251 | Home | 99% | 84-52 | W 96-59 | Right |
| Thu 5 Nov8 PM ET | vs Toledorank 132 | Home | 99% | 89-62 | — | |
| Tue 10 Nov7 PM ET | vs Dukerank 1 | Neutral | 35% | 72-76 | — |
Rooting guide
Early in the season other teams' results barely move a team's chances, so the list is mostly its own games; by February the bubble and conference races make other games matter.
Players
| Player | Games | Minutes | Points | Rebounds | Assists | Rating | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jeremy Fears Jr.G | 1 | 26.0 | 13.0 | 1.0 | 11.0 | +9.9 | +5.5 |
| Coen CarrF | 1 | 25.0 | 12.0 | 8.0 | 0.0 | +8.2 | +4.5 |
| Jasiah JervisG | 1 | 23.0 | 4.0 | 3.0 | 0.0 | +1.7 | +1.6 |
| Jordan ScottF | 1 | 22.0 | 11.0 | 6.0 | 3.0 | +6.6 | +3.4 |
| Anton BonkeC · transfer from Charlotte | 1 | 20.0 | 11.0 | 13.0 | 0.0 | +6.1 | +2.9 |
| Cam WardF | 1 | 16.0 | 9.0 | 5.0 | 1.0 | +7.3 | +2.7 |
| Kur TengG | 1 | 15.0 | 11.0 | 0.0 | 3.0 | +6.4 | +2.2 |
| Ethan TaylorC | 1 | 14.0 | 1.0 | 2.0 | 0.0 | +2.0 | +1.0 |
| Carlos Medlock Jr.G | 1 | 14.0 | 9.0 | 1.0 | 4.0 | +2.0 | +1.0 |
| Kaleb GlennF | 1 | 12.0 | 11.0 | 2.0 | 0.0 | +2.1 | +0.9 |
| Julius AventF | 1 | 7.0 | 2.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | +2.2 | +0.5 |
| Brennan WaltonF | 1 | 2.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | +5.7 | +0.3 |
| Colin WaltonF | 1 | 2.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | +5.7 | +0.3 |
| Matthew WatkinsG | 1 | 2.0 | 2.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | +2.3 | +0.2 |
Style and luck
Every teamThe Four Factors adjusted for opponents
| Offence | Defence | League | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ShootingEffective FG% · decides 44% of the margin | 52.1%rank 40 | 49.7%rank 89 | 50.4% |
| TurnoversTurnover rate · decides 25% of the margin | 18.7%rank 240 | 18.7%rank 118 | 18.6% |
| Offensive reboundsRebound rate · decides 21% of the margin | 33.4%rank 38 | 31.2%rank 115 | 31.7% |
| Free throwsFree throws per FG attempt · decides 10% of the margin | 24.4%rank 270 | 25.4%rank 246 | 25.2% |
Defence is what opponents managed. For turnovers a high defence figure is good; for the others, low is good.
Luck so far
- Wins against the pre-game chances
- 1.0 won, 1.0 expected (0.0)
- Opponents' three-point shooting
- +2.4 points a game (they shot 28.6%, league 32.3%)
- Opponents' free throws
- +3.5 points a game
- Close games: by 5 or fewer, or overtime
- None yet
Opponents' three-point shooting repeats little from one half of a season to the other (correlation 0.21), and their free throws even less (0.18), so a team living off either is likely to come back toward average. Positive numbers mean the luck has helped.
Rating this season
- Preseason net rating
- +26.7
- Last season's net rating
- +28.6
- Last season's minutes returning
- 60%
- Transfers in, weighted by minutes
- −0.1
- Change since preseason
- +0.9
- Offence, points per 100 possessions
- 119.4 (rank 9)
- Defence, points allowed per 100
- 91.7 (rank 9)
- Tempo, possessions per 40 minutes
- 71.0 (rank 230)
- Schedule so far, opponents' average
- −9.5 (rank 199)
Big Ten Conference by rating
| # | Team | Record | Conference | Net | Offence | Defence | National rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Illinois | 1-0 | 0-0 | +29.6 | 123.2 | 93.5 | 5 |
| 2 | Michigan | 1-0 | 0-0 | +28.1 | 120.5 | 92.4 | 6 |
| 3 | Michigan State | 1-0 | 0-0 | +27.6 | 119.4 | 91.7 | 8 |
| 4 | Nebraska | 1-0 | 0-0 | +23.7 | 117.8 | 94.0 | 15 |
| 5 | Purdue | 0-1 | 0-0 | +21.9 | 119.2 | 97.3 | 17 |
| 6 | Iowa | 1-0 | 0-0 | +21.6 | 117.5 | 96.0 | 20 |
| 7 | UCLA | 1-0 | 0-0 | +21.4 | 117.1 | 95.7 | 21 |
| 8 | Ohio State | 0-1 | 0-0 | +17.8 | 118.7 | 100.8 | 34 |
| 9 | Indiana | 1-0 | 0-0 | +16.6 | 113.9 | 97.3 | 40 |
| 10 | Wisconsin | 1-0 | 0-0 | +16.6 | 114.7 | 98.1 | 41 |
| 11 | Maryland | 1-0 | 0-0 | +15.8 | 114.4 | 98.7 | 43 |
| 12 | Oregon | 1-0 | 0-0 | +15.3 | 113.2 | 97.8 | 47 |
| 13 | USC | 1-0 | 0-0 | +15.3 | 112.6 | 97.2 | 48 |
| 14 | Northwestern | 1-0 | 0-0 | +12.8 | 113.0 | 100.3 | 61 |
| 15 | Minnesota | 1-0 | 0-0 | +12.0 | 110.3 | 98.3 | 65 |
| 16 | Penn State | 1-0 | 0-0 | +11.1 | 112.4 | 101.3 | 68 |
| 17 | Rutgers | 0-0 | 0-0 | +10.2 | 110.9 | 100.7 | 75 |
| 18 | Washington | 1-0 | 0-0 | +9.6 | 111.3 | 101.7 | 81 |