Princeton Tigers
Makes the tournament14%From 20,000 simulated seasons · average seed 13.0
Wins the national title0%Final Four 0% · projected 18-13
Net rating−1.2Rank 138 of 365 · offence 147, defence 146
Season outlook
- Projected record
- 18-13 (11 to 24 wins)
- Projected conference record
- 8-6
- Wins or shares the conference title
- 16%
- Wins the conference tournament
- 13%
- Average seed if in the field
- 13.0
- A 1 seed
- 0%
- Makes the field14%
- Round of 321%
- Sweet 16<1%
- Elite Eight<1%
- Final Four0%
- Title game0%
- Champion0%
Schedule and results
| Date | Opponent | Where | Win chance | Projected | Result | Pick |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mon 2 Nov | vs Carnegie Mellonnot Division I | Home | — | — | W 78-46 | |
| Thu 5 Nov7 PM ET | vs Hofstrarank 166 | Home | 69% | 74-68 | — | |
| Sun 8 Nov1 PM ET | at Sienarank 249 | Away | 57% | 73-71 | — | |
| Wed 11 Nov7 PM ET | vs Stony Brookrank 248 | Home | 80% | 78-68 | — |
Rooting guide
- Thu 5 Nov: vs HofstraA win: 14% · a loss: 14%0 pts
- Sun 8 Nov: at SienaA win: 14% · a loss: 14%0 pts
- Wed 11 Nov: vs Stony BrookA win: 14% · a loss: 15%−1 pts
Early in the season other teams' results barely move a team's chances, so the list is mostly its own games; by February the bubble and conference races make other games matter.
Players
| Player | Games | Minutes | Points | Rebounds | Assists | Rating | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dalen DavisG | 1 | 23.0 | 16.0 | 0.0 | 2.0 | +0.2 | +0.9 |
| Christopher KirkpatrickG | 1 | 22.0 | 13.0 | 3.0 | 0.0 | −0.6 | +0.6 |
| Jackson HickeG | 1 | 19.0 | 11.0 | 5.0 | 3.0 | +1.7 | +1.2 |
| Malik AbdullahiF | 1 | 18.0 | 5.0 | 4.0 | 4.0 | +0.4 | +0.8 |
| Jack StantonG | 1 | 18.0 | 2.0 | 2.0 | 1.0 | +0.3 | +0.8 |
| Landon ClarkG | 1 | 17.0 | 6.0 | 1.0 | 6.0 | −0.8 | +0.4 |
| CJ HappyF | 1 | 17.0 | 5.0 | 1.0 | 3.0 | −0.9 | +0.3 |
| Jacob HugginsF | 1 | 16.0 | 4.0 | 5.0 | 0.0 | −0.2 | +0.5 |
| Ethan SabecG | 1 | 16.0 | 11.0 | 6.0 | 0.0 | −0.4 | +0.5 |
| Peyton SealsG | 1 | 13.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | −1.8 | +0.1 |
| Sebastian WhitfieldG | 1 | 6.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | −1.2 | +0.1 |
| Jacob HammondF | 1 | 4.0 | 4.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | −1.2 | +0.1 |
| Will KutzlerF | 1 | 3.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | −1.4 | 0.0 |
| Cash McSweeneyF | 1 | 2.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | −1.9 | 0.0 |
| William HiggsC | 1 | 2.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | −0.1 | +0.1 |
| Cooper MuellerG | 1 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | −1.4 | 0.0 |
| Ryan MandesG | 1 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | −1.5 | 0.0 |
| Jake SussbergG | 1 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | −0.9 | 0.0 |
| Noah CohenG | 1 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
Style and luck
Every teamThe Four Factors adjusted for opponents
| Offence | Defence | League | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ShootingEffective FG% · decides 44% of the margin | 50.4%rank 135 | 50.4%rank 153 | 50.4% |
| TurnoversTurnover rate · decides 25% of the margin | 18.6%rank 155 | 18.6%rank 133 | 18.6% |
| Offensive reboundsRebound rate · decides 21% of the margin | 31.7%rank 127 | 31.7%rank 162 | 31.7% |
| Free throwsFree throws per FG attempt · decides 10% of the margin | 25.2%rank 133 | 25.2%rank 152 | 25.2% |
Defence is what opponents managed. For turnovers a high defence figure is good; for the others, low is good.
Luck so far
- Close games: by 5 or fewer, or overtime
- None yet
Opponents' three-point shooting repeats little from one half of a season to the other (correlation 0.21), and their free throws even less (0.18), so a team living off either is likely to come back toward average. Positive numbers mean the luck has helped.
Rating this season
- Preseason net rating
- −1.2
- Last season's net rating
- −7.5
- Last season's minutes returning
- 100%
- Transfers in, weighted by minutes
- 0.0
- Change since preseason
- 0.0
- Offence, points per 100 possessions
- 104.3 (rank 147)
- Defence, points allowed per 100
- 105.5 (rank 146)
- Tempo, possessions per 40 minutes
- 69.9 (rank 336)
- Schedule so far, opponents' average
- —
Ivy League by rating
| # | Team | Record | Conference | Net | Offence | Defence | National rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Yale | 1-0 | 0-0 | +4.5 | 108.7 | 104.2 | 106 |
| 2 | Harvard | 1-0 | 0-0 | +1.4 | 104.9 | 103.5 | 121 |
| 3 | Pennsylvania | 0-0 | 0-0 | −0.6 | 104.9 | 105.4 | 131 |
| 4 | Princeton | 1-0 | 0-0 | −1.2 | 104.3 | 105.5 | 138 |
| 5 | Cornell | 1-0 | 0-0 | −4.3 | 106.8 | 111.2 | 177 |
| 6 | Dartmouth | 2-0 | 0-0 | −4.4 | 100.4 | 104.8 | 178 |
| 7 | Columbia | 0-1 | 0-0 | −6.4 | 103.8 | 110.2 | 205 |
| 8 | Brown | 0-1 | 0-0 | −9.1 | 96.0 | 105.2 | 246 |