Utah State Aggies
Makes the tournament52%From 20,000 simulated seasons · average seed 8.9
Wins the national title<1%Final Four 1% · projected 25-9
Net rating+15.1Rank 51 of 365 · offence 32, defence 66
Season outlook
- Projected record
- 25-9 (20 to 30 wins)
- Projected conference record
- 11-5
- Wins or shares the conference title
- 26%
- Wins the conference tournament
- 21%
- Average seed if in the field
- 8.9
- A 1 seed
- 0%
- Makes the field52%
- Round of 3224%
- Sweet 166%
- Elite Eight2%
- Final Four1%
- Title game<1%
- Champion<1%
Schedule and results
| Date | Opponent | Where | Win chance | Projected | Result | Pick |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mon 2 Nov | vs Idaho Staterank 263 | Home | 95% | 79-59 | W 94-58 | Right |
| Sat 7 Nov4 PM ET | vs Omaharank 254 | Home | 97% | 89-65 | — | |
| Tue 10 Nov9 PM ET | vs Utah Techrank 284 | Home | 99% | 90-64 | — |
Rooting guide
- Sat 7 Nov: vs OmahaA win: 52% · a loss: 51%+1 pts
- Tue 10 Nov: vs Utah TechA win: 52% · a loss: 51%+1 pts
Early in the season other teams' results barely move a team's chances, so the list is mostly its own games; by February the bubble and conference races make other games matter.
Players
| Player | Games | Minutes | Points | Rebounds | Assists | Rating | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dallin HallG · transfer from Virginia | 1 | 34.0 | 8.0 | 3.0 | 7.0 | +3.9 | +3.6 |
| Solomon CallaghanG · transfer from Wright St | 1 | 31.0 | 14.0 | 5.0 | 3.0 | +0.6 | +1.4 |
| Kingston TosiF | 1 | 27.0 | 26.0 | 5.0 | 1.0 | +0.2 | +1.1 |
| Will HornsethF · transfer from Northern Iowa | 1 | 26.0 | 16.0 | 6.0 | 2.0 | +5.1 | +3.3 |
| Mason FalslevG | 1 | 21.0 | 9.0 | 9.0 | 3.0 | +7.9 | +3.7 |
| Karson TemplinF | 1 | 20.0 | 6.0 | 6.0 | 1.0 | +6.0 | +2.9 |
| Brayden BoeG | 1 | 17.0 | 2.0 | 3.0 | 2.0 | +0.3 | +0.7 |
| AJ BatesG · transfer from Louisiana Tech | 1 | 14.0 | 9.0 | 1.0 | 5.0 | +1.5 | +0.9 |
| Sean FeltsC | 1 | 5.0 | 4.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | +0.6 | +0.2 |
| Ace ReiserG | 1 | 3.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | +0.7 | +0.1 |
| Jordan BoydG | 1 | 2.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | +0.7 | +0.1 |
Style and luck
Every teamThe Four Factors adjusted for opponents
| Offence | Defence | League | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ShootingEffective FG% · decides 44% of the margin | 51.5%rank 64 | 49.1%rank 59 | 50.4% |
| TurnoversTurnover rate · decides 25% of the margin | 19.1%rank 304 | 18.5%rank 215 | 18.5% |
| Offensive reboundsRebound rate · decides 21% of the margin | 34.1%rank 23 | 31.2%rank 110 | 31.8% |
| Free throwsFree throws per FG attempt · decides 10% of the margin | 25.0%rank 227 | 25.9%rank 274 | 25.1% |
Defence is what opponents managed. For turnovers a high defence figure is good; for the others, low is good.
Luck so far
- Wins against the pre-game chances
- 1.0 won, 0.9 expected (+0.1)
- Opponents' three-point shooting
- +15.2 points a game (they shot 12.0%, league 32.3%)
- Opponents' free throws
- +1.5 points a game
- Close games: by 5 or fewer, or overtime
- None yet
Opponents' three-point shooting repeats little from one half of a season to the other (correlation 0.21), and their free throws even less (0.18), so a team living off either is likely to come back toward average. Positive numbers mean the luck has helped.
Rating this season
- Preseason net rating
- +12.7
- Last season's net rating
- +22.4
- Last season's minutes returning
- 25%
- Transfers in, weighted by minutes
- +3.5
- Change since preseason
- +2.3
- Offence, points per 100 possessions
- 114.8 (rank 32)
- Defence, points allowed per 100
- 99.8 (rank 66)
- Tempo, possessions per 40 minutes
- 71.4 (rank 171)
- Schedule so far, opponents' average
- −10.6 (rank 212)
Pac-12 Conference by rating
| # | Team | Record | Conference | Net | Offence | Defence | National rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Gonzaga | 1-0 | 0-0 | +20.5 | 115.7 | 95.1 | 27 |
| 2 | Utah State | 1-0 | 0-0 | +15.1 | 114.8 | 99.8 | 51 |
| 3 | Colorado State | 1-0 | 0-0 | +10.9 | 112.4 | 101.4 | 69 |
| 4 | Boise State | 1-0 | 0-0 | +10.4 | 110.9 | 100.5 | 74 |
| 5 | San Diego State | 1-0 | 0-0 | +9.0 | 110.3 | 101.3 | 83 |
| 6 | Oregon State | 1-0 | 0-0 | +6.6 | 108.9 | 102.3 | 95 |
| 7 | Texas State | 1-0 | 0-0 | −2.9 | 103.3 | 106.2 | 154 |
| 8 | Fresno State | 1-0 | 0-0 | −3.3 | 102.3 | 105.6 | 161 |
| 9 | Washington State | 0-1 | 0-0 | −4.2 | 102.5 | 106.7 | 174 |