E Washington 65, Stanford 74
Final. Monday, November 2, 2026, 10:00 PM ET at Maples Pavilion. E Washington our rank 152 · 0-3; Stanford our rank 78 · 3-0.
Who won E Washington vs Stanford?
Final: Stanford 74, Eastern Washington 65. Before tip-off the model gave Stanford a 88% chance to win, with a projected margin of 14.3 points for Stanford. Julius Price scored 17 for Stanford; Alton Hamilton IV had 20 for E Washington.
Prediction made that morning; page updated November 13, 2026.
The call
Half of games like thisFour in five
Calls of 80–90% have been right 84.9% of the time in 12,246 past games, and the typical miss on the margin is 8.8 points. After the final, the result is pinned to this strip.
The game without one player
Without Nick Townsend: E Washington 21%Stanford 79%
The white mark is the call with him: Stanford 88%.
| Player | Points a game he adds | Stanford without him | Change | Projected score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stanford | ||||
| Nick Townsend | 4.4 | 79% | −9 | 64–74 |
| Aidan Cammann | 2.0 | 84% | −4 | 63–75 |
| Austin Maurer | 1.7 | 85% | −3 | 63–76 |
| Christian Bliss | 1.7 | 85% | −3 | 63–76 |
| E Washington | ||||
| Alton Hamilton IV | 1.6 | 90% | +2 | 61–77 |
| Jamil Miller | 0.8 | 89% | +1 | 62–77 |
| Jalen Griffith | 0.7 | 89% | +1 | 62–77 |
| Emmett Marquardt | 0.6 | 89% | +1 | 62–77 |
Change is in Stanford's win chance, in points. Scores read E Washington, then Stanford. A player's value is what the team is better by with him than with a replacement, from the player ratings.
Play-by-play
Team numbers
Model against the line
Your call
All of today's gamesWin probability
Game chat
Loading the chat…
Why the model sees it this way
The game in numbers
The matchup
Form
E Washington
No games yet this season: this is its first.
Stanford
No games yet this season: this is its first.
The spread and the total are the lines logged with each prediction. Form is what happened; the ratings above already count recent games more.
Offense against defense
| E Washington | Stanford | |
|---|---|---|
| Points scored per 100 possessions | 108.0 112th | 111.0 84th |
| Points allowed per 100 | 110.8 252nd | 101.3 74th |
| Possessions a game | 71.2 133rd | 70.4 222nd |
| Shooting (effective field-goal %) | 51.0% 146th | 50.7% 168th |
| Opponents' shooting | 52.6% 317th | 50.7% 195th |
| Turnovers, share of possessions | 17.4% 102nd | 18.3% 209th |
| Offensive rebounds, share of misses | 34.0% 62nd | 29.5% 307th |
| Free throws per shot | 0.26 178th | 0.26 212th |
The widest gap: Stanford's offense (84th) against E Washington's defense (252nd), of 365 teams.
First half
Stanford led at the half, as projected. The margin was off by 3.8 points and the total by 1.0.
- At halftime
- E Washington 30, Stanford 34
- Projected halftime score
- E Washington 29, Stanford 36
- First-half margin
- Stanford by 7.8
- First-half points, both teams
- 65.0
- Tied at the half
- 4%
Our own projection, not a sportsbook's first-half line. On 11,516 past games it had not seen, the halftime leader was right 67.2% of the time and the first-half total was off by 8.1 points on average. This season: 366 of 476 halftime leaders right. Scorecard
Box score
E Washington
| Player | Min | Pts | Reb | Ast | 3s |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alton Hamilton IVF | 35 | 20 | 9 | 1 | 0 |
| Cole SchererG | 31 | 11 | 2 | 2 | 1 |
| Jamil MillerF | 29 | 9 | 6 | 0 | 0 |
| Emmett MarquardtF | 27 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 0 |
| Jalen GriffithG | 23 | 9 | 4 | 3 | 0 |
| Isak HomeliusG | 15 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Malachi RichmondG | 12 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Shaumba NgoyiF | 9 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 |
| Lance Horntvedt Jr.F | 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Stanford
| Player | Min | Pts | Reb | Ast | 3s |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nick TownsendF | 36 | 12 | 6 | 5 | 0 |
| Julius PriceG | 34 | 17 | 2 | 4 | 1 |
| Aziz OlajuwonG | 30 | 12 | 4 | 0 | 2 |
| Isaiah RogersG | 28 | 10 | 4 | 4 | 2 |
| Aidan CammannF | 27 | 13 | 4 | 0 | 0 |
| Christian BlissG | 16 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| Anthony Batson Jr.G | 12 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Donavin YoungF | 11 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 0 |
| Austin MaurerC | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |