Gonzaga Bulldogs
Makes the tournament66%From 20,000 simulated seasons · average seed 9.8
Wins the national title0%Final Four <1% · projected 27-6
Net rating+18.0Rank 42 of 363 · offence 41, defence 52
Season outlook
- Projected record
- 27-6 (22 to 31 wins)
- Projected conference record
- 14-2
- Wins or shares the conference title
- 61%
- Wins the conference tournament
- 46%
- Average seed if in the field
- 9.8
- A 1 seed
- 0%
- Makes the field66%
- Round of 3223%
- Sweet 162%
- Elite Eight<1%
- Final Four<1%
- Title game<1%
- Champion0%
Schedule and results
| Date | Opponent | Where | Win chance | Projected | Result | Pick |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mon 2 Nov | vs North Dakota Staterank 64 | Home | 76% | 88-78 | W 62-56 | Right |
| Fri 6 Nov9 PM ET | vs Idahorank 107 | Home | 89% | 78-61 | — | |
| Sun 8 Nov5 PM ET | vs UC Riversiderank 250 | Home | 98% | 82-51 | — |
Rooting guide
- Fri 6 Nov: vs IdahoA win: 67% · a loss: 65%+2 pts
- Sun 8 Nov: vs UC RiversideA win: 66% · a loss: 66%0 pts
Early in the season other teams' results barely move a team's chances, so the list is mostly its own games; by February the bubble and conference races make other games matter.
Players
| Player | Games | Minutes | Points | Rebounds | Assists | Rating | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Allie TurnerG | 1 | 35.0 | 8.0 | 3.0 | 5.0 | +4.1 | +4.0 |
| Teryn GardnerG | 1 | 31.0 | 9.0 | 3.0 | 4.0 | +3.0 | +2.9 |
| Lauren WhittakerF | 1 | 29.0 | 22.0 | 10.0 | 2.0 | +10.1 | +6.5 |
| Zeryhia AokusoG | 1 | 24.0 | 6.0 | 3.0 | 2.0 | +2.1 | +1.9 |
| Taylor SmithF | 1 | 21.0 | 10.0 | 2.0 | 4.0 | +3.3 | +2.1 |
| McKynnlie DalanF | 1 | 17.0 | 2.0 | 2.0 | 2.0 | +1.2 | +1.1 |
| Julia WilsonG | 1 | 16.0 | 1.0 | 2.0 | 1.0 | +1.5 | +1.1 |
| Ines BettencourtG | 1 | 12.0 | 4.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | +2.7 | +1.1 |
| Abby LuskF | 1 | 8.0 | 0.0 | 3.0 | 0.0 | −0.6 | +0.2 |
| Emmy RoachG · transfer from Rider | 1 | 5.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | −1.2 | +0.1 |
| Christabel OsaroboG | 1 | 2.0 | 0.0 | 2.0 | 0.0 | +0.7 | +0.1 |
Style and luck
Every teamThe Four Factors adjusted for opponents
| Offence | Defence | League | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ShootingEffective FG% · decides 44% of the margin | 44.1%rank 265 | 45.4%rank 281 | 44.7% |
| TurnoversTurnover rate · decides 27% of the margin | 23.6%rank 128 | 23.6%rank 234 | 23.8% |
| Offensive reboundsRebound rate · decides 20% of the margin | 32.4%rank 292 | 33.0%rank 101 | 33.5% |
| Free throwsFree throws per FG attempt · decides 9% of the margin | 18.5%rank 341 | 19.4%rank 81 | 20.5% |
Defence is what opponents managed. For turnovers a high defence figure is good; for the others, low is good.
Luck so far
- Wins against the pre-game chances
- 1.0 won, 0.8 expected (+0.2)
- Opponents' three-point shooting
- +5.1 points a game (they shot 20.0%, league 28.4%)
- Opponents' free throws
- −1.2 points a game
- Close games: by 5 or fewer, or overtime
- None yet
Opponents' three-point shooting repeats little from one half of a season to the other (correlation 0.17), and their free throws even less (0.22), so a team living off either is likely to come back toward average. Positive numbers mean the luck has helped.
Rating this season
- Preseason net rating
- +19.3
- Last season's net rating
- +17.2
- Last season's minutes returning
- 94%
- Transfers in, weighted by minutes
- −4.3
- Change since preseason
- −1.3
- Offence, points per 100 possessions
- 102.5 (rank 41)
- Defence, points allowed per 100
- 84.5 (rank 52)
- Tempo, possessions per 40 minutes
- 72.7 (rank 235)
- Schedule so far, opponents' average
- +13.8 (rank 61)
Pac-12 Conference by rating
| # | Team | Record | Conference | Net | Offence | Defence | National rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Gonzaga | 1-0 | 0-0 | +18.0 | 102.5 | 84.5 | 42 |
| 2 | San Diego State | 2-0 | 0-0 | +15.5 | 101.1 | 85.6 | 54 |
| 3 | Colorado State | 1-0 | 0-0 | +7.0 | 92.4 | 85.4 | 93 |
| 4 | Oregon State | 0-1 | 0-0 | +4.8 | 95.8 | 90.9 | 102 |
| 5 | Washington State | 0-1 | 0-0 | +0.6 | 92.3 | 91.8 | 137 |
| 6 | Boise State | 1-0 | 0-0 | −1.6 | 90.9 | 92.5 | 156 |
| 7 | Texas State | 1-0 | 0-0 | −7.8 | 86.5 | 94.4 | 210 |
| 8 | Fresno State | 1-0 | 0-0 | −9.1 | 85.1 | 94.2 | 222 |
| 9 | Utah State | 1-0 | 0-0 | −14.5 | 83.1 | 97.5 | 283 |