Washington State Cougars
Makes the tournament3%From 20,000 simulated seasons · average seed 12.1
Wins the national title0%Final Four 0% · projected 14-18
Net rating+0.6Rank 134 of 363 · offence 123, defence 155
Season outlook
- Projected record
- 14-18 (9 to 20 wins)
- Projected conference record
- 8-8
- Wins or shares the conference title
- 2%
- Wins the conference tournament
- 3%
- Average seed if in the field
- 12.1
- A 1 seed
- 0%
- Makes the field3%
- Round of 32<1%
- Sweet 160%
- Elite Eight0%
- Final Four0%
- Title game0%
- Champion0%
Schedule and results
Rooting guide
Early in the season other teams' results barely move a team's chances, so the list is mostly its own games; by February the bubble and conference races make other games matter.
Players
| Player | Games | Minutes | Points | Rebounds | Assists | Rating | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Eleonora VillaG | 1 | 35.0 | 20.0 | 3.0 | 7.0 | +1.9 | +2.6 |
| Mackenzie ChatfieldG | 1 | 27.0 | 0.0 | 3.0 | 3.0 | −0.3 | +0.9 |
| Charlotte AbrahamG | 1 | 25.0 | 0.0 | 6.0 | 0.0 | +1.5 | +1.7 |
| Malia RuudF | 1 | 24.0 | 13.0 | 7.0 | 0.0 | +1.0 | +1.4 |
| Elizaveta FilchaginaF · transfer from SMU | 1 | 19.0 | 7.0 | 3.0 | 4.0 | −2.5 | −0.1 |
| Tanja ValancicF | 1 | 18.0 | 2.0 | 4.0 | 0.0 | −1.3 | +0.3 |
| Aicha BahG | 1 | 17.0 | 4.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | −0.6 | +0.5 |
| Alex CovillC | 1 | 16.0 | 4.0 | 2.0 | 1.0 | +1.5 | +1.1 |
| Malvina HaziriG | 1 | 16.0 | 6.0 | 1.0 | 2.0 | −2.4 | −0.1 |
| Tahara MagassaF | 1 | 2.0 | 2.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | −0.1 | +0.1 |
| Reese JordanG | 1 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | −0.1 | 0.0 |
Style and luck
Every teamThe Four Factors adjusted for opponents
| Offence | Defence | League | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ShootingEffective FG% · decides 44% of the margin | 44.5%rank 230 | 44.5%rank 126 | 44.6% |
| TurnoversTurnover rate · decides 27% of the margin | 21.4%rank 2 | 22.5%rank 332 | 23.9% |
| Offensive reboundsRebound rate · decides 20% of the margin | 30.7%rank 353 | 31.2%rank 26 | 33.5% |
| Free throwsFree throws per FG attempt · decides 9% of the margin | 18.1%rank 350 | 21.2%rank 277 | 20.4% |
Defence is what opponents managed. For turnovers a high defence figure is good; for the others, low is good.
Luck so far
- Wins against the pre-game chances
- 0.0 won, 0.0 expected (0.0)
- Opponents' three-point shooting
- −7.9 points a game (they shot 42.1%, league 28.3%)
- Opponents' free throws
- −3.8 points a game
- Close games: by 5 or fewer, or overtime
- None yet
Opponents' three-point shooting repeats little from one half of a season to the other (correlation 0.17), and their free throws even less (0.22), so a team living off either is likely to come back toward average. Positive numbers mean the luck has helped.
Rating this season
- Preseason net rating
- −0.3
- Last season's net rating
- −6.1
- Last season's minutes returning
- 76%
- Transfers in, weighted by minutes
- −0.1
- Change since preseason
- +1.0
- Offence, points per 100 possessions
- 92.3 (rank 123)
- Defence, points allowed per 100
- 91.7 (rank 155)
- Tempo, possessions per 40 minutes
- 73.0 (rank 177)
- Schedule so far, opponents' average
- +22.4 (rank 31)
Pac-12 Conference by rating
| # | Team | Record | Conference | Net | Offence | Defence | National rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Gonzaga | 1-0 | 0-0 | +18.0 | 102.4 | 84.5 | 43 |
| 2 | San Diego State | 2-0 | 0-0 | +15.4 | 101.0 | 85.6 | 57 |
| 3 | Colorado State | 1-0 | 0-0 | +7.0 | 92.3 | 85.3 | 93 |
| 4 | Oregon State | 0-1 | 0-0 | +4.8 | 95.7 | 90.9 | 101 |
| 5 | Washington State | 0-1 | 0-0 | +0.6 | 92.3 | 91.7 | 134 |
| 6 | Boise State | 1-0 | 0-0 | −1.6 | 90.8 | 92.3 | 154 |
| 7 | Texas State | 1-0 | 0-0 | −7.9 | 86.4 | 94.3 | 211 |
| 8 | Fresno State | 1-0 | 0-0 | −9.1 | 85.0 | 94.1 | 224 |
| 9 | Utah State | 1-0 | 0-0 | −14.5 | 83.0 | 97.5 | 283 |