California Golden Bears
Next: vs Long Beach St · Thu 5 Nov, 9 PM ETProjected 87-46 · Game page
Makes the tournament70%From 20,000 simulated seasons · average seed 6.7
Wins the national title<1%Final Four 1% · projected 23-9
Net rating+22.4Rank 32 of 363 · offence 38, defence 30
Season outlook
- Projected record
- 23-9 (18 to 28 wins)
- Projected conference record
- 11-7
- Wins or shares the conference title
- 2%
- Wins the conference tournament
- 3%
- Average seed if in the field
- 6.7
- A 1 seed
- <1%
- Makes the field70%
- Round of 3246%
- Sweet 1612%
- Elite Eight3%
- Final Four1%
- Title game<1%
- Champion<1%
Schedule and results
| Date | Opponent | Where | Win chance | Projected | Result | Pick |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mon 2 Nov | vs Washington Staterank 135 | Home | 96% | 93-69 | W 80-58 | Right |
| Thu 5 Nov9 PM ET | vs Long Beach Staterank 324 | Home | 100% | 87-46 | — | |
| Sun 8 Nov2 PM ET | vs San Franciscorank 124 | Neutral | 91% | 79-61 | — | |
| Thu 12 Nov2 PM ET | vs Charlestonrank 172 | Home | 97% | 81-54 | — |
Rooting guide
- Sun 8 Nov: vs San FranciscoA win: 70% · a loss: 67%+4 pts
- Thu 12 Nov: vs CharlestonA win: 70% · a loss: 71%−1 pts
Early in the season other teams' results barely move a team's chances, so the list is mostly its own games; by February the bubble and conference races make other games matter.
Players
| Player | Games | Minutes | Points | Rebounds | Assists | Rating | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lulu TwidaleG | 1 | 34.0 | 26.0 | 8.0 | 3.0 | +5.7 | +4.9 |
| Ruby PerkinsG | 1 | 30.0 | 4.0 | 7.0 | 2.0 | 0.0 | +1.2 |
| Taylor BarnesF | 1 | 28.0 | 6.0 | 4.0 | 1.0 | +4.9 | +3.6 |
| Gisella MaulG | 1 | 27.0 | 9.0 | 4.0 | 2.0 | +6.8 | +4.4 |
| Shannon DowellG · transfer from Missouri | 1 | 23.0 | 17.0 | 7.0 | 2.0 | +5.6 | +3.3 |
| Albina SylaC · transfer from Rhode Island | 1 | 17.0 | 4.0 | 6.0 | 4.0 | +7.5 | +3.0 |
| Naya OjukwuF | 1 | 12.0 | 7.0 | 3.0 | 1.0 | +7.4 | +2.1 |
| Zara RussellF | 1 | 11.0 | 3.0 | 2.0 | 0.0 | +0.5 | +0.5 |
| Jovana JevtovicC | 1 | 11.0 | 4.0 | 3.0 | 0.0 | +0.5 | +0.5 |
| Anastasia DrosouniG | 1 | 3.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | +3.5 | +0.3 |
| Carly AmbornG · transfer from Stanford | 1 | 2.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | +5.1 | +0.3 |
| Sofia BowesG | 1 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | +3.4 | +0.1 |
| Anna LagonikakiC | 1 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | +0.8 | +0.1 |
Style and luck
Every teamThe Four Factors adjusted for opponents
| Offence | Defence | League | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ShootingEffective FG% · decides 44% of the margin | 44.6%rank 240 | 44.6%rank 127 | 44.7% |
| TurnoversTurnover rate · decides 27% of the margin | 22.4%rank 38 | 21.4%rank 358 | 23.8% |
| Offensive reboundsRebound rate · decides 20% of the margin | 31.2%rank 338 | 30.7%rank 9 | 33.5% |
| Free throwsFree throws per FG attempt · decides 9% of the margin | 21.2%rank 86 | 18.1%rank 13 | 20.5% |
Defence is what opponents managed. For turnovers a high defence figure is good; for the others, low is good.
Luck so far
- Wins against the pre-game chances
- 1.0 won, 1.0 expected (0.0)
- Opponents' three-point shooting
- −0.5 points a game (they shot 29.2%, league 28.5%)
- Opponents' free throws
- +1.8 points a game
- Close games: by 5 or fewer, or overtime
- None yet
Opponents' three-point shooting repeats little from one half of a season to the other (correlation 0.17), and their free throws even less (0.22), so a team living off either is likely to come back toward average. Positive numbers mean the luck has helped.
Rating this season
- Preseason net rating
- +23.4
- Last season's net rating
- +20.0
- Last season's minutes returning
- 64%
- Transfers in, weighted by minutes
- +3.9
- Change since preseason
- −0.9
- Offence, points per 100 possessions
- 103.6 (rank 38)
- Defence, points allowed per 100
- 81.2 (rank 30)
- Tempo, possessions per 40 minutes
- 72.9 (rank 213)
- Schedule so far, opponents' average
- +0.6 (rank 115)
Atlantic Coast Conference by rating
| # | Team | Record | Conference | Net | Offence | Defence | National rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Louisville | 2-0 | 0-0 | +35.8 | 111.3 | 75.5 | 8 |
| 2 | Duke | 1-0 | 0-0 | +33.5 | 108.5 | 75.0 | 12 |
| 3 | Notre Dame | 1-0 | 0-0 | +29.6 | 111.6 | 82.0 | 18 |
| 4 | North Carolina | 0-1 | 0-0 | +29.4 | 107.6 | 78.2 | 19 |
| 5 | NC State | 2-0 | 0-0 | +28.3 | 107.5 | 79.3 | 23 |
| 6 | Virginia Tech | 2-0 | 0-0 | +22.9 | 103.6 | 80.7 | 31 |
| 7 | California | 1-0 | 0-0 | +22.4 | 103.6 | 81.2 | 32 |
| 8 | Miami | 1-0 | 0-0 | +18.9 | 102.4 | 83.4 | 40 |
| 9 | Virginia | 1-0 | 0-0 | +17.0 | 101.2 | 84.3 | 47 |
| 10 | Syracuse | 1-0 | 0-0 | +15.7 | 98.8 | 83.1 | 53 |
| 11 | Clemson | 1-0 | 0-0 | +15.6 | 100.7 | 85.0 | 54 |
| 12 | Stanford | 1-1 | 0-0 | +14.3 | 100.3 | 85.9 | 62 |
| 13 | Florida State | 2-0 | 0-0 | +12.7 | 99.9 | 87.2 | 68 |
| 14 | Georgia Tech | 1-0 | 0-0 | +12.3 | 97.8 | 85.5 | 71 |
| 15 | SMU | 2-0 | 0-0 | +2.7 | 89.5 | 86.8 | 114 |
| 16 | Wake Forest | 1-0 | 0-0 | +0.8 | 90.8 | 90.0 | 133 |
| 17 | Pittsburgh | 1-0 | 0-0 | −1.9 | 91.2 | 93.1 | 158 |
| 18 | Boston College | 0-1 | 0-0 | −4.8 | 89.5 | 94.3 | 188 |