Boston College Eagles
Makes the tournament<1%From 20,000 simulated seasons
Wins the national title0%Final Four 0% · projected 6-24
Net rating−5.8Rank 190 of 363 · offence 168, defence 236
Season outlook
- Projected record
- 6-24 (3 to 10 wins)
- Projected conference record
- 2-16
- Wins or shares the conference title
- 0%
- Wins the conference tournament
- 0%
- Average seed if in the field
- —
- A 1 seed
- 0%
- Makes the field<1%
- Round of 320%
- Sweet 160%
- Elite Eight0%
- Final Four0%
- Title game0%
- Champion0%
Schedule and results
| Date | Opponent | Where | Win chance | Projected | Result | Pick |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mon 2 Nov | vs Holy Crossrank 178 | Home | 69% | 82-75 | L 54-64 | Wrong |
| Thu 5 Nov7 PM ET | at Harvardrank 58 | Away | 5% | 56-78 | Live | |
| Wed 11 Nov6 PM ET | vs UMass Lowellrank 296 | Home | 85% | 73-59 | — |
Rooting guide
- Thu 5 Nov: at HarvardA win: 0% · a loss: 0%0 pts
- Wed 11 Nov: vs UMass LowellA win: 0% · a loss: 0%0 pts
Early in the season other teams' results barely move a team's chances, so the list is mostly its own games; by February the bubble and conference races make other games matter.
Players
| Player | Games | Minutes | Points | Rebounds | Assists | Rating | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Daniele PaunksnyteG | 1 | 37.0 | 13.0 | 14.0 | 1.0 | −1.3 | +0.6 |
| Jocelyne GrierG | 1 | 31.0 | 13.0 | 1.0 | 2.0 | −0.6 | +0.9 |
| Megan HollingsworthG · transfer from Pitt | 1 | 31.0 | 4.0 | 6.0 | 1.0 | −2.3 | −0.1 |
| Athena TomlinsonG | 1 | 30.0 | 5.0 | 2.0 | 3.0 | −1.2 | +0.5 |
| Nuria AusaverriF | 1 | 29.0 | 6.0 | 3.0 | 0.0 | −1.2 | +0.5 |
| Eunicia SalgadoF | 1 | 24.0 | 10.0 | 3.0 | 1.0 | −1.1 | +0.5 |
| Nora ArozenaF | 1 | 11.0 | 1.0 | 2.0 | 0.0 | −0.8 | +0.3 |
| Natalia Hall-RosaG · transfer from Seton Hall | 1 | 7.0 | 2.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | +2.2 | +0.6 |
Style and luck
Every teamThe Four Factors adjusted for opponents
| Offence | Defence | League | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ShootingEffective FG% · decides 44% of the margin | 42.4%rank 346 | 45.6%rank 299 | 44.6% |
| TurnoversTurnover rate · decides 27% of the margin | 24.1%rank 252 | 23.5%rank 254 | 23.9% |
| Offensive reboundsRebound rate · decides 20% of the margin | 31.0%rank 341 | 33.6%rank 231 | 33.4% |
| Free throwsFree throws per FG attempt · decides 9% of the margin | 21.2%rank 88 | 20.1%rank 134 | 20.4% |
Defence is what opponents managed. For turnovers a high defence figure is good; for the others, low is good.
Luck so far
- Wins against the pre-game chances
- 0.0 won, 0.7 expected (−0.7)
- Opponents' three-point shooting
- +3.3 points a game (they shot 22.2%, league 28.3%)
- Opponents' free throws
- +0.8 points a game
- Close games: by 5 or fewer, or overtime
- None yet
Opponents' three-point shooting repeats little from one half of a season to the other (correlation 0.17), and their free throws even less (0.22), so a team living off either is likely to come back toward average. Positive numbers mean the luck has helped.
Rating this season
- Preseason net rating
- −0.9
- Last season's net rating
- −6.6
- Last season's minutes returning
- 25%
- Transfers in, weighted by minutes
- +0.1
- Change since preseason
- −4.9
- Offence, points per 100 possessions
- 89.2 (rank 168)
- Defence, points allowed per 100
- 94.9 (rank 236)
- Tempo, possessions per 40 minutes
- 73.6 (rank 126)
- Schedule so far, opponents' average
- −3.2 (rank 152)
Atlantic Coast Conference by rating
| # | Team | Record | Conference | Net | Offence | Defence | National rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Louisville | 2-0 | 0-0 | +35.8 | 111.1 | 75.3 | 7 |
| 2 | Duke | 1-0 | 0-0 | +33.4 | 108.2 | 74.8 | 12 |
| 3 | Notre Dame | 1-0 | 0-0 | +29.6 | 111.3 | 81.7 | 18 |
| 4 | North Carolina | 0-1 | 0-0 | +29.4 | 107.4 | 78.0 | 19 |
| 5 | NC State | 2-0 | 0-0 | +28.2 | 107.3 | 79.1 | 23 |
| 6 | Virginia Tech | 2-0 | 0-0 | +22.8 | 103.3 | 80.5 | 31 |
| 7 | California | 1-0 | 0-0 | +22.4 | 103.3 | 80.9 | 32 |
| 8 | Miami | 1-0 | 0-0 | +18.9 | 102.1 | 83.2 | 40 |
| 9 | Virginia | 1-0 | 0-0 | +16.9 | 101.0 | 84.1 | 49 |
| 10 | Syracuse | 1-0 | 0-0 | +15.7 | 98.6 | 82.9 | 54 |
| 11 | Clemson | 1-0 | 0-0 | +15.6 | 100.4 | 84.8 | 55 |
| 12 | Stanford | 1-1 | 0-0 | +14.3 | 100.0 | 85.7 | 63 |
| 13 | Georgia Tech | 1-0 | 0-0 | +12.3 | 97.5 | 85.3 | 71 |
| 14 | Florida State | 2-0 | 0-0 | +12.1 | 100.2 | 88.1 | 72 |
| 15 | SMU | 2-0 | 0-0 | +2.7 | 89.2 | 86.6 | 114 |
| 16 | Wake Forest | 2-0 | 0-0 | +0.4 | 91.8 | 91.4 | 139 |
| 17 | Pittsburgh | 1-0 | 0-0 | −1.9 | 90.9 | 92.9 | 157 |
| 18 | Boston College | 0-1 | 0-0 | −5.8 | 89.2 | 94.9 | 190 |