North Carolina Tar Heels
Next: vs South Carolina · Sun 8 Nov, 5:30 PM ETProjected 68-81 · Game page
Makes the tournament89%From 20,000 simulated seasons · average seed 5.0
Wins the national title<1%Final Four 4% · projected 25-9
Net rating+29.4Rank 19 of 363 · offence 22, defence 15
Season outlook
- Projected record
- 25-9 (21 to 30 wins)
- Projected conference record
- 13-5
- Wins or shares the conference title
- 14%
- Wins the conference tournament
- 12%
- Average seed if in the field
- 5.0
- A 1 seed
- 2%
- Makes the field89%
- Round of 3275%
- Sweet 1639%
- Elite Eight14%
- Final Four4%
- Title game1%
- Champion<1%
Schedule and results
| Date | Opponent | Where | Win chance | Projected | Result | Pick |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mon 2 Nov | vs Oklahomarank 9 | Neutral | 42% | 84-87 | L 79-91 | Right |
| Sun 8 Nov5:30 PM ET | vs South Carolinarank 2 | Neutral | 15% | 68-81 | — | |
| Wed 11 Nov7 PM ET | vs North Carolina Centralrank 333 | Home | 100% | 92-42 | — |
Rooting guide
- Sun 8 Nov: vs South CarolinaA win: 90% · a loss: 89%+1 pts
Early in the season other teams' results barely move a team's chances, so the list is mostly its own games; by February the bubble and conference races make other games matter.
Players
| Player | Games | Minutes | Points | Rebounds | Assists | Rating | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kate HarpringG | 1 | 34.0 | 21.0 | 6.0 | 5.0 | +0.3 | +1.5 |
| Reniya KellyG | 1 | 33.0 | 11.0 | 1.0 | 7.0 | +5.7 | +4.8 |
| Nyla BrooksG | 1 | 30.0 | 13.0 | 2.0 | 2.0 | +7.7 | +5.5 |
| Sophie BurrowsG · transfer from Syracuse | 1 | 24.0 | 9.0 | 8.0 | 1.0 | +7.4 | +4.2 |
| Achol AkotF · transfer from Oklahoma St | 1 | 24.0 | 11.0 | 8.0 | 2.0 | +10.2 | +5.5 |
| Gabby WhiteG · transfer from Virginia | 1 | 17.0 | 10.0 | 4.0 | 2.0 | +5.9 | +2.5 |
| Taissa QueirozG | 1 | 14.0 | 0.0 | 6.0 | 2.0 | +6.5 | +2.2 |
| Laila HullG | 1 | 7.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | +8.3 | +1.4 |
| Noelle BofiaC | 1 | 7.0 | 2.0 | 4.0 | 0.0 | +1.0 | +0.4 |
| Blanca ThomasC | 1 | 6.0 | 2.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | +6.1 | +0.9 |
| Chloe ClardyG · transfer from Stanford | 1 | 4.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | +7.6 | +0.7 |
Style and luck
Every teamThe Four Factors adjusted for opponents
| Offence | Defence | League | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ShootingEffective FG% · decides 44% of the margin | 43.7%rank 283 | 45.8%rank 304 | 44.6% |
| TurnoversTurnover rate · decides 27% of the margin | 23.1%rank 75 | 24.0%rank 123 | 23.9% |
| Offensive reboundsRebound rate · decides 20% of the margin | 35.0%rank 55 | 35.1%rank 317 | 33.5% |
| Free throwsFree throws per FG attempt · decides 9% of the margin | 18.6%rank 328 | 20.4%rank 140 | 20.4% |
Defence is what opponents managed. For turnovers a high defence figure is good; for the others, low is good.
Luck so far
- Wins against the pre-game chances
- 0.0 won, 0.4 expected (−0.4)
- Opponents' three-point shooting
- −6.2 points a game (they shot 35.7%, league 28.3%)
- Opponents' free throws
- −1.4 points a game
- Close games: by 5 or fewer, or overtime
- None yet
Opponents' three-point shooting repeats little from one half of a season to the other (correlation 0.17), and their free throws even less (0.22), so a team living off either is likely to come back toward average. Positive numbers mean the luck has helped.
Rating this season
- Preseason net rating
- +30.8
- Last season's net rating
- +35.2
- Last season's minutes returning
- 43%
- Transfers in, weighted by minutes
- +12.0
- Change since preseason
- −1.4
- Offence, points per 100 possessions
- 107.5 (rank 22)
- Defence, points allowed per 100
- 78.1 (rank 15)
- Tempo, possessions per 40 minutes
- 73.7 (rank 118)
- Schedule so far, opponents' average
- +35.5 (rank 7)
Atlantic Coast Conference by rating
| # | Team | Record | Conference | Net | Offence | Defence | National rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Louisville | 2-0 | 0-0 | +35.8 | 111.2 | 75.4 | 7 |
| 2 | Duke | 1-0 | 0-0 | +33.4 | 108.3 | 74.9 | 12 |
| 3 | Notre Dame | 1-0 | 0-0 | +29.6 | 111.4 | 81.8 | 18 |
| 4 | North Carolina | 0-1 | 0-0 | +29.4 | 107.5 | 78.1 | 19 |
| 5 | NC State | 2-0 | 0-0 | +28.2 | 107.4 | 79.2 | 23 |
| 6 | Virginia Tech | 2-0 | 0-0 | +22.8 | 103.4 | 80.6 | 31 |
| 7 | California | 1-0 | 0-0 | +22.4 | 103.4 | 81.0 | 32 |
| 8 | Miami | 1-0 | 0-0 | +18.9 | 102.2 | 83.3 | 40 |
| 9 | Virginia | 1-0 | 0-0 | +16.9 | 101.1 | 84.2 | 49 |
| 10 | Syracuse | 1-0 | 0-0 | +15.7 | 98.7 | 83.0 | 54 |
| 11 | Clemson | 1-0 | 0-0 | +15.6 | 100.5 | 84.9 | 55 |
| 12 | Stanford | 1-1 | 0-0 | +14.3 | 100.1 | 85.8 | 63 |
| 13 | Georgia Tech | 1-0 | 0-0 | +12.3 | 97.7 | 85.4 | 71 |
| 14 | Florida State | 2-0 | 0-0 | +12.1 | 100.2 | 88.2 | 72 |
| 15 | SMU | 2-0 | 0-0 | +2.7 | 89.3 | 86.7 | 114 |
| 16 | Wake Forest | 2-0 | 0-0 | +0.4 | 91.9 | 91.5 | 139 |
| 17 | Pittsburgh | 1-0 | 0-0 | −1.9 | 91.0 | 93.0 | 157 |
| 18 | Boston College | 0-1 | 0-0 | −5.8 | 89.3 | 95.0 | 191 |