Virginia Tech Hokies
Next: vs James Madison · Sun 8 Nov, 6 PM ETProjected 74-62 · Game page
Makes the tournament66%From 20,000 simulated seasons · average seed 7.5
Wins the national title<1%Final Four 1% · projected 23-8
Net rating+22.9Rank 31 of 363 · offence 37, defence 27
Season outlook
- Projected record
- 23-8 (19 to 28 wins)
- Projected conference record
- 11-7
- Wins or shares the conference title
- 3%
- Wins the conference tournament
- 3%
- Average seed if in the field
- 7.5
- A 1 seed
- <1%
- Makes the field66%
- Round of 3241%
- Sweet 168%
- Elite Eight2%
- Final Four1%
- Title game<1%
- Champion<1%
Schedule and results
| Date | Opponent | Where | Win chance | Projected | Result | Pick |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mon 2 Nov | vs North Carolina Centralrank 330 | Home | 100% | 100-63 | W 85-39 | Right |
| Wed 4 Nov | vs Delawarerank 302 | Home | 99% | 82-50 | W 101-53 | Right |
| Sun 8 Nov6 PM ET | vs James Madisonrank 55 | Home | 80% | 74-62 | — | |
| Thu 12 Nov6 PM ET | at VCUrank 166 | Away | 90% | 75-58 | — |
Rooting guide
- Sun 8 Nov: vs James MadisonA win: 68% · a loss: 60%+8 pts
- Thu 12 Nov: at VCUA win: 67% · a loss: 62%+5 pts
Early in the season other teams' results barely move a team's chances, so the list is mostly its own games; by February the bubble and conference races make other games matter.
Players
| Player | Games | Minutes | Points | Rebounds | Assists | Rating | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Samyha SuffrenG | 2 | 23.0 | 13.5 | 3.5 | 1.5 | +7.5 | +4.1 |
| Leila WellsG | 2 | 23.0 | 10.0 | 3.5 | 2.5 | +5.0 | +3.1 |
| Carleigh WenzelG | 2 | 21.5 | 17.5 | 2.0 | 3.0 | +7.6 | +3.9 |
| Kaleo AndersonG | 2 | 20.5 | 8.5 | 4.0 | 1.5 | +1.8 | +1.5 |
| Kate SearsG | 2 | 20.0 | 4.5 | 2.0 | 3.5 | +1.8 | +1.5 |
| Jessica DimaroC | 2 | 19.0 | 16.0 | 10.0 | 1.0 | +2.1 | +1.5 |
| Aniya TrentF | 2 | 17.5 | 3.0 | 3.0 | 3.0 | +5.9 | +2.6 |
| Amani JenkinsF | 2 | 17.0 | 11.5 | 6.0 | 1.5 | +6.4 | +2.7 |
| Francesca BaldassarreG | 2 | 14.0 | 2.5 | 1.0 | 1.0 | +2.0 | +1.1 |
| Arianna Harris-MottF | 2 | 11.5 | 2.5 | 4.5 | 0.5 | +2.2 | +0.9 |
| Alyssa LathamF · transfer from Tennessee | 1 | 17.0 | 5.0 | 3.0 | 2.0 | +9.0 | +3.5 |
| Natalee GoffG | 2 | 4.5 | 1.0 | 1.5 | 0.5 | +2.6 | +0.4 |
Style and luck
Every teamThe Four Factors adjusted for opponents
| Offence | Defence | League | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ShootingEffective FG% · decides 44% of the margin | 46.4%rank 36 | 40.9%rank 3 | 44.7% |
| TurnoversTurnover rate · decides 27% of the margin | 21.9%rank 14 | 25.5%rank 23 | 23.8% |
| Offensive reboundsRebound rate · decides 20% of the margin | 34.1%rank 102 | 34.3%rank 272 | 33.5% |
| Free throwsFree throws per FG attempt · decides 9% of the margin | 18.9%rank 315 | 22.5%rank 331 | 20.5% |
Defence is what opponents managed. For turnovers a high defence figure is good; for the others, low is good.
Luck so far
- Wins against the pre-game chances
- 2.0 won, 2.0 expected (0.0)
- Opponents' three-point shooting
- +5.3 points a game (they shot 13.0%, league 28.5%)
- Opponents' free throws
- −0.3 points a game
- Close games: by 5 or fewer, or overtime
- None yet
Opponents' three-point shooting repeats little from one half of a season to the other (correlation 0.17), and their free throws even less (0.22), so a team living off either is likely to come back toward average. Positive numbers mean the luck has helped.
Rating this season
- Preseason net rating
- +16.3
- Last season's net rating
- +23.7
- Last season's minutes returning
- 39%
- Transfers in, weighted by minutes
- +3.7
- Change since preseason
- +6.6
- Offence, points per 100 possessions
- 103.6 (rank 37)
- Defence, points allowed per 100
- 80.7 (rank 27)
- Tempo, possessions per 40 minutes
- 74.6 (rank 58)
- Schedule so far, opponents' average
- −18.9 (rank 240)
Atlantic Coast Conference by rating
| # | Team | Record | Conference | Net | Offence | Defence | National rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Louisville | 2-0 | 0-0 | +35.8 | 111.3 | 75.5 | 8 |
| 2 | Duke | 1-0 | 0-0 | +33.5 | 108.5 | 75.0 | 12 |
| 3 | Notre Dame | 1-0 | 0-0 | +29.6 | 111.6 | 82.0 | 18 |
| 4 | North Carolina | 0-1 | 0-0 | +29.4 | 107.6 | 78.2 | 19 |
| 5 | NC State | 2-0 | 0-0 | +28.3 | 107.5 | 79.3 | 23 |
| 6 | Virginia Tech | 2-0 | 0-0 | +22.9 | 103.6 | 80.7 | 31 |
| 7 | California | 1-0 | 0-0 | +22.4 | 103.6 | 81.2 | 32 |
| 8 | Miami | 1-0 | 0-0 | +18.9 | 102.4 | 83.4 | 40 |
| 9 | Virginia | 1-0 | 0-0 | +17.0 | 101.2 | 84.3 | 47 |
| 10 | Syracuse | 1-0 | 0-0 | +15.7 | 98.8 | 83.1 | 53 |
| 11 | Clemson | 1-0 | 0-0 | +15.6 | 100.7 | 85.0 | 54 |
| 12 | Stanford | 1-1 | 0-0 | +14.3 | 100.3 | 85.9 | 62 |
| 13 | Florida State | 2-0 | 0-0 | +12.7 | 99.9 | 87.2 | 68 |
| 14 | Georgia Tech | 1-0 | 0-0 | +12.3 | 97.8 | 85.5 | 71 |
| 15 | SMU | 2-0 | 0-0 | +2.7 | 89.5 | 86.8 | 114 |
| 16 | Wake Forest | 1-0 | 0-0 | +0.8 | 90.8 | 90.0 | 133 |
| 17 | Pittsburgh | 1-0 | 0-0 | −1.9 | 91.2 | 93.1 | 158 |
| 18 | Boston College | 0-1 | 0-0 | −4.8 | 89.5 | 94.3 | 188 |