SMU Mustangs
Next: vs East Texas A&M · Sun 8 Nov, 7 PM ETProjected 73-55 · Game page
Makes the tournament2%From 20,000 simulated seasons · average seed 10.3
Wins the national title0%Final Four 0% · projected 14-18
Net rating+2.8Rank 114 of 363 · offence 163, defence 74
Season outlook
- Projected record
- 14-18 (10 to 19 wins)
- Projected conference record
- 4-14
- Wins or shares the conference title
- 0%
- Wins the conference tournament
- 0%
- Average seed if in the field
- 10.3
- A 1 seed
- 0%
- Makes the field2%
- Round of 32<1%
- Sweet 16<1%
- Elite Eight0%
- Final Four0%
- Title game0%
- Champion0%
Schedule and results
| Date | Opponent | Where | Win chance | Projected | Result | Pick |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tue 3 Nov | vs Le Moynerank 357 | Home | 96% | 79-55 | W 72-36 | Right |
| Thu 5 Nov | vs Hamptonrank 267 | Home | 94% | 76-55 | W 66-54 | Right |
| Sun 8 Nov7 PM ET | vs East Texas A&Mrank 260 | Home | 91% | 73-55 | — | |
| Wed 11 Nov7 PM ET | vs Long Island Universityrank 346 | Home | 99% | 79-51 | — |
Rooting guide
- Sun 8 Nov: vs East Texas A&MA win: 0% · a loss: 0%0 pts
- Wed 11 Nov: vs Long Island UniversityA win: 0% · a loss: 0%0 pts
Early in the season other teams' results barely move a team's chances, so the list is mostly its own games; by February the bubble and conference races make other games matter.
Players
| Player | Games | Minutes | Points | Rebounds | Assists | Rating | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Adja KaneF | 2 | 25.5 | 4.0 | 7.0 | 1.5 | −1.0 | +0.5 |
| Mailien RolfG | 2 | 24.5 | 6.0 | 4.0 | 0.5 | −1.0 | +0.5 |
| Grace EzebiloF · transfer from Charleston | 2 | 24.5 | 11.0 | 14.0 | 1.0 | +4.0 | +2.8 |
| Theresa Hagans Jr.G · transfer from Pitt | 2 | 24.5 | 12.5 | 5.5 | 3.5 | +0.6 | +1.2 |
| Shania JamesG | 2 | 20.5 | 9.0 | 1.5 | 3.0 | −0.8 | +0.5 |
| Zahra KingG | 2 | 16.5 | 6.5 | 2.0 | 1.0 | +1.6 | +1.1 |
| Camille NesmithC | 2 | 15.5 | 5.0 | 5.5 | 1.0 | −0.5 | +0.5 |
| Kaylin JacksonF | 2 | 12.0 | 2.0 | 4.5 | 0.5 | −0.5 | +0.4 |
| Elise HillG | 2 | 10.5 | 7.0 | 0.5 | 1.0 | −0.4 | +0.3 |
| Kinsea GrimesF · transfer from Coastal | 2 | 10.0 | 0.0 | 0.5 | 0.5 | +3.4 | +1.0 |
| Izela ArenasG · transfer from Kansas St | 2 | 9.5 | 5.0 | 2.5 | 0.5 | +2.5 | +0.8 |
| Roxy WhiteF | 1 | 7.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | +0.3 |
| Zoe OsbyF | 1 | 6.0 | 2.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | +0.2 |
Style and luck
Every teamThe Four Factors adjusted for opponents
| Offence | Defence | League | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ShootingEffective FG% · decides 44% of the margin | 42.0%rank 356 | 43.0%rank 35 | 44.7% |
| TurnoversTurnover rate · decides 27% of the margin | 24.2%rank 273 | 25.4%rank 28 | 23.8% |
| Offensive reboundsRebound rate · decides 20% of the margin | 37.2%rank 2 | 33.6%rank 231 | 33.5% |
| Free throwsFree throws per FG attempt · decides 9% of the margin | 17.8%rank 357 | 19.6%rank 92 | 20.5% |
Defence is what opponents managed. For turnovers a high defence figure is good; for the others, low is good.
Luck so far
- Wins against the pre-game chances
- 2.0 won, 1.9 expected (+0.1)
- Opponents' three-point shooting
- −0.7 points a game (they shot 30.0%, league 28.4%)
- Opponents' free throws
- −1.4 points a game
- Close games: by 5 or fewer, or overtime
- None yet
Opponents' three-point shooting repeats little from one half of a season to the other (correlation 0.17), and their free throws even less (0.22), so a team living off either is likely to come back toward average. Positive numbers mean the luck has helped.
Rating this season
- Preseason net rating
- −1.9
- Last season's net rating
- −5.9
- Last season's minutes returning
- 15%
- Transfers in, weighted by minutes
- +1.3
- Change since preseason
- +4.7
- Offence, points per 100 possessions
- 89.5 (rank 163)
- Defence, points allowed per 100
- 86.7 (rank 74)
- Tempo, possessions per 40 minutes
- 73.8 (rank 116)
- Schedule so far, opponents' average
- −21.9 (rank 250)
Atlantic Coast Conference by rating
| # | Team | Record | Conference | Net | Offence | Defence | National rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Louisville | 2-0 | 0-0 | +35.9 | 111.3 | 75.4 | 8 |
| 2 | Duke | 1-0 | 0-0 | +33.5 | 108.4 | 74.9 | 12 |
| 3 | Notre Dame | 1-0 | 0-0 | +29.6 | 111.5 | 81.9 | 18 |
| 4 | North Carolina | 0-1 | 0-0 | +29.4 | 107.6 | 78.2 | 19 |
| 5 | NC State | 2-0 | 0-0 | +28.3 | 107.5 | 79.2 | 23 |
| 6 | Virginia Tech | 2-0 | 0-0 | +22.9 | 103.5 | 80.6 | 31 |
| 7 | California | 1-0 | 0-0 | +22.4 | 103.5 | 81.1 | 32 |
| 8 | Miami | 1-0 | 0-0 | +18.9 | 102.3 | 83.4 | 40 |
| 9 | Virginia | 1-0 | 0-0 | +17.0 | 101.2 | 84.2 | 47 |
| 10 | Syracuse | 1-0 | 0-0 | +15.7 | 98.8 | 83.0 | 52 |
| 11 | Clemson | 1-0 | 0-0 | +15.7 | 100.6 | 85.0 | 53 |
| 12 | Stanford | 1-1 | 0-0 | +14.4 | 100.2 | 85.8 | 61 |
| 13 | Florida State | 2-0 | 0-0 | +12.7 | 99.9 | 87.1 | 68 |
| 14 | Georgia Tech | 1-0 | 0-0 | +12.3 | 97.8 | 85.4 | 71 |
| 15 | SMU | 2-0 | 0-0 | +2.8 | 89.5 | 86.7 | 114 |
| 16 | Wake Forest | 1-0 | 0-0 | +0.8 | 90.7 | 89.9 | 134 |
| 17 | Pittsburgh | 1-0 | 0-0 | −1.9 | 91.2 | 93.0 | 159 |
| 18 | Boston College | 0-1 | 0-0 | −4.8 | 89.4 | 94.2 | 188 |