Loyola Maryland Greyhounds
Makes the tournament2%From 20,000 simulated seasons · average seed 14.8
Wins the national title0%Final Four 0% · projected 12-18
Net rating−12.8Rank 266 of 363 · offence 269, defence 263
Season outlook
- Projected record
- 12-18 (6 to 18 wins)
- Projected conference record
- 7-11
- Wins or shares the conference title
- 1%
- Wins the conference tournament
- 2%
- Average seed if in the field
- 14.8
- A 1 seed
- 0%
- Makes the field2%
- Round of 32<1%
- Sweet 160%
- Elite Eight0%
- Final Four0%
- Title game0%
- Champion0%
Schedule and results
| Date | Opponent | Where | Win chance | Projected | Result | Pick |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mon 2 Nov | vs Notre Dame (MD)not Division I | Home | — | — | W 76-30 | |
| Sat 7 Nov12 PM ET | at La Sallerank 167 | Away | 18% | 57-70 | — | |
| Tue 10 Nov7 PM ET | vs Yalerank 218 | Home | 53% | 63-62 | — |
Rooting guide
Early in the season other teams' results barely move a team's chances, so the list is mostly its own games; by February the bubble and conference races make other games matter.
Players
| Player | Games | Minutes | Points | Rebounds | Assists | Rating | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Takeira RameyG · transfer from Texas St | 1 | 30.0 | 10.0 | 4.0 | 1.0 | −3.9 | −0.9 |
| Olivia ShaughnessyG | 1 | 24.0 | 10.0 | 5.0 | 2.0 | −2.1 | 0.0 |
| Debra Wilson-OsuideG | 1 | 22.0 | 2.0 | 1.0 | 3.0 | −1.4 | +0.3 |
| Amandine AmorichF | 1 | 21.0 | 11.0 | 8.0 | 2.0 | −2.1 | 0.0 |
| Aidan LangleyG · transfer from Towson | 1 | 20.0 | 11.0 | 3.0 | 0.0 | −2.7 | −0.2 |
| Kailey KaletG | 1 | 19.0 | 2.0 | 1.0 | 3.0 | −4.8 | −0.9 |
| Avery SimmonsF | 1 | 17.0 | 6.0 | 8.0 | 1.0 | −4.2 | −0.6 |
| Tyler EdwardsF · transfer from FDU | 1 | 16.0 | 12.0 | 6.0 | 2.0 | −1.0 | +0.3 |
| Sydney BassF | 1 | 12.0 | 3.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | −1.8 | +0.1 |
| Talia ShumateG | 1 | 10.0 | 6.0 | 3.0 | 0.0 | −1.0 | +0.2 |
| Ava KopetskieG | 1 | 9.0 | 3.0 | 2.0 | 1.0 | −1.0 | +0.2 |
Style and luck
Every teamThe Four Factors adjusted for opponents
| Offence | Defence | League | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ShootingEffective FG% · decides 44% of the margin | 44.7%rank 148 | 44.7%rank 141 | 44.7% |
| TurnoversTurnover rate · decides 27% of the margin | 23.9%rank 167 | 23.9%rank 138 | 23.9% |
| Offensive reboundsRebound rate · decides 20% of the margin | 33.3%rank 147 | 33.3%rank 147 | 33.3% |
| Free throwsFree throws per FG attempt · decides 9% of the margin | 20.8%rank 147 | 20.8%rank 154 | 20.8% |
Defence is what opponents managed. For turnovers a high defence figure is good; for the others, low is good.
Luck so far
- Close games: by 5 or fewer, or overtime
- None yet
Opponents' three-point shooting repeats little from one half of a season to the other (correlation 0.17), and their free throws even less (0.22), so a team living off either is likely to come back toward average. Positive numbers mean the luck has helped.
Rating this season
- Preseason net rating
- −12.8
- Last season's net rating
- −12.2
- Last season's minutes returning
- 52%
- Transfers in, weighted by minutes
- −0.3
- Change since preseason
- 0.0
- Offence, points per 100 possessions
- 83.3 (rank 269)
- Defence, points allowed per 100
- 96.2 (rank 263)
- Tempo, possessions per 40 minutes
- 70.6 (rank 354)
- Schedule so far, opponents' average
- —
Patriot League by rating
| # | Team | Record | Conference | Net | Offence | Defence | National rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Army | 2-0 | 0-0 | +7.4 | 96.1 | 88.8 | 90 |
| 2 | Navy | 1-0 | 0-0 | +4.6 | 93.1 | 88.5 | 101 |
| 3 | Lehigh | 0-1 | 0-0 | +1.8 | 92.0 | 90.2 | 123 |
| 4 | Holy Cross | 2-0 | 0-0 | −3.3 | 84.2 | 87.5 | 178 |
| 5 | Boston University | 0-1 | 0-0 | −11.5 | 84.8 | 96.3 | 246 |
| 6 | Bucknell | 0-1 | 0-0 | −12.5 | 84.8 | 97.2 | 263 |
| 7 | Loyola Maryland | 1-0 | 0-0 | −12.8 | 83.3 | 96.2 | 266 |
| 8 | Colgate | 1-0 | 0-0 | −14.7 | 82.2 | 96.9 | 287 |
| 9 | American University | 0-1 | 0-0 | −16.8 | 84.5 | 101.3 | 301 |
| 10 | Lafayette | 0-1 | 0-0 | −17.2 | 83.7 | 100.9 | 306 |