Wichita State Shockers
Makes the tournament37%From 20,000 simulated seasons · average seed 11.1
Wins the national title<1%Final Four <1% · projected 26-9
Net rating+9.6Rank 80 of 365 · offence 90, defence 58
Season outlook
- Projected record
- 26-9 (21 to 30 wins)
- Projected conference record
- 13-5
- Wins or shares the conference title
- 39%
- Wins the conference tournament
- 30%
- Average seed if in the field
- 11.1
- A 1 seed
- 0%
- Makes the field37%
- Round of 329%
- Sweet 162%
- Elite Eight<1%
- Final Four<1%
- Title game<1%
- Champion<1%
Schedule and results
| Date | Opponent | Where | Win chance | Projected | Result | Pick |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wed 4 Nov | vs Cal State Northridgerank 190 | Home | 95% | 87-67 | W 79-67 | Right |
| Sun 8 Nov11 PM ET | vs USCrank 48 | Neutral | 35% | 74-78 | — | |
| Wed 11 Nov7:30 PM ET | vs Friendsnot Division I | Home | — | — | — |
Rooting guide
- Sun 8 Nov: vs USCA win: 41% · a loss: 36%+6 pts
Early in the season other teams' results barely move a team's chances, so the list is mostly its own games; by February the bubble and conference races make other games matter.
Players
| Player | Games | Minutes | Points | Rebounds | Assists | Rating | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kenyon GilesG | 1 | 36.0 | 21.0 | 1.0 | 8.0 | +2.9 | +3.2 |
| Bryce HeardG · transfer from Dayton | 1 | 34.0 | 6.0 | 7.0 | 0.0 | +0.7 | +1.7 |
| Jordan FrisonG · transfer from Chattanooga | 1 | 34.0 | 6.0 | 5.0 | 7.0 | +0.5 | +1.6 |
| Jahari LongG · transfer from George Mason | 1 | 33.0 | 12.0 | 5.0 | 1.0 | +1.6 | +2.1 |
| William BergC | 1 | 28.0 | 26.0 | 16.0 | 0.0 | +4.8 | +3.4 |
| Michael Gray Jr.G | 1 | 17.0 | 5.0 | 2.0 | 1.0 | +1.3 | +1.0 |
| Emmanuel OkoraforF | 1 | 7.0 | 2.0 | 2.0 | 0.0 | +4.2 | +0.8 |
| Cyr MalongaC · transfer from New Mexico St | 1 | 5.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | +0.2 | +0.2 |
| Jaret ValenciaF | 1 | 4.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | +0.5 | +0.2 |
| Joy IghovodjaG | 1 | 2.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | −0.6 | +0.1 |
Style and luck
Every teamThe Four Factors adjusted for opponents
| Offence | Defence | League | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ShootingEffective FG% · decides 44% of the margin | 47.9%rank 359 | 49.5%rank 71 | 50.4% |
| TurnoversTurnover rate · decides 25% of the margin | 16.5%rank 3 | 17.4%rank 345 | 18.6% |
| Offensive reboundsRebound rate · decides 21% of the margin | 29.9%rank 337 | 31.4%rank 136 | 31.7% |
| Free throwsFree throws per FG attempt · decides 10% of the margin | 23.5%rank 309 | 25.1%rank 146 | 25.2% |
Defence is what opponents managed. For turnovers a high defence figure is good; for the others, low is good.
Luck so far
- Wins against the pre-game chances
- 1.0 won, 0.9 expected (+0.1)
- Opponents' three-point shooting
- +5.4 points a game (they shot 23.8%, league 32.3%)
- Opponents' free throws
- +1.8 points a game
- Close games: by 5 or fewer, or overtime
- None yet
Opponents' three-point shooting repeats little from one half of a season to the other (correlation 0.21), and their free throws even less (0.18), so a team living off either is likely to come back toward average. Positive numbers mean the luck has helped.
Rating this season
- Preseason net rating
- +11.4
- Last season's net rating
- +12.4
- Last season's minutes returning
- 71%
- Transfers in, weighted by minutes
- +0.6
- Change since preseason
- −1.8
- Offence, points per 100 possessions
- 108.8 (rank 90)
- Defence, points allowed per 100
- 99.2 (rank 58)
- Tempo, possessions per 40 minutes
- 71.6 (rank 155)
- Schedule so far, opponents' average
- −5.4 (rank 161)
American Conference by rating
| # | Team | Record | Conference | Net | Offence | Defence | National rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Wichita State | 1-0 | 0-0 | +9.6 | 108.8 | 99.2 | 80 |
| 2 | Memphis | 1-0 | 0-0 | +8.7 | 109.6 | 100.9 | 85 |
| 3 | South Florida | 1-0 | 0-0 | +5.6 | 108.6 | 103.0 | 100 |
| 4 | North Texas | 1-0 | 0-0 | +2.9 | 104.0 | 101.1 | 115 |
| 5 | Florida Atlantic | 1-0 | 0-0 | −0.1 | 103.6 | 103.7 | 127 |
| 6 | Temple | 1-0 | 0-0 | −1.1 | 103.5 | 104.5 | 136 |
| 7 | Tulsa | 1-0 | 0-0 | −1.9 | 104.5 | 106.4 | 145 |
| 8 | Charlotte | 1-0 | 0-0 | −2.5 | 105.2 | 107.7 | 149 |
| 9 | UAB | 0-1 | 0-0 | −3.5 | 106.2 | 109.7 | 164 |
| 10 | Tulane | 1-0 | 0-0 | −3.8 | 104.7 | 108.6 | 169 |
| 11 | Rice | 1-0 | 0-0 | −5.2 | 102.7 | 107.8 | 188 |
| 12 | East Carolina | 1-0 | 0-0 | −7.0 | 100.9 | 107.9 | 216 |
| 13 | UTSA | 0-1 | 0-0 | −15.2 | 98.0 | 113.2 | 315 |