Washington Huskies
Next: vs Miss Valley St · Mon 9 Nov, 10 PM ETProjected 93-57 · Game page
Makes the tournament11%From 20,000 simulated seasons · average seed 8.1
Wins the national title0%Final Four <1% · projected 13-17
Net rating+9.6Rank 81 of 365 · offence 71, defence 98
Season outlook
- Projected record
- 13-17 (9 to 17 wins)
- Projected conference record
- 6-14
- Wins or shares the conference title
- <1%
- Wins the conference tournament
- <1%
- Average seed if in the field
- 8.1
- A 1 seed
- 0%
- Makes the field11%
- Round of 325%
- Sweet 161%
- Elite Eight<1%
- Final Four<1%
- Title game<1%
- Champion0%
Schedule and results
| Date | Opponent | Where | Win chance | Projected | Result | Pick |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mon 2 Nov | vs Colgaterank 197 | Home | 92% | 77-60 | W 90-76 | Right |
| Mon 9 Nov10 PM ET | vs Mississippi Valley Staterank 365 | Home | 100% | 93-57 | — |
Rooting guide
- No games this week
Early in the season other teams' results barely move a team's chances, so the list is mostly its own games; by February the bubble and conference races make other games matter.
Players
| Player | Games | Minutes | Points | Rebounds | Assists | Rating | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ryan BeasleyG · transfer from San Francisco | 1 | 36.0 | 8.0 | 5.0 | 4.0 | +1.4 | +2.2 |
| LeJuan WattsG · transfer from Texas Tech | 1 | 32.0 | 22.0 | 3.0 | 3.0 | +4.0 | +3.5 |
| Wesley Yates IIIG | 1 | 30.0 | 10.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | +2.0 | +2.2 |
| Nikola DzepinaF | 1 | 30.0 | 27.0 | 7.0 | 0.0 | +0.5 | +1.4 |
| Tayshawn ComerG · transfer from Nevada | 1 | 25.0 | 7.0 | 3.0 | 1.0 | +1.8 | +1.7 |
| Lathan SommervilleC | 1 | 16.0 | 11.0 | 5.0 | 0.0 | +0.7 | +0.8 |
| Steele VentersG · transfer from Gonzaga | 1 | 15.0 | 3.0 | 4.0 | 0.0 | +3.0 | +1.4 |
| Parker FriedrichsenG · transfer from Davidson | 1 | 12.0 | 2.0 | 1.0 | 2.0 | +2.0 | +0.9 |
| Jasir RencherF | 1 | 3.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | +1.3 | +0.2 |
| Wini BragaF | 1 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | −0.7 | 0.0 |
Style and luck
Every teamThe Four Factors adjusted for opponents
| Offence | Defence | League | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ShootingEffective FG% · decides 44% of the margin | 50.4%rank 133 | 51.1%rank 277 | 50.4% |
| TurnoversTurnover rate · decides 25% of the margin | 18.2%rank 103 | 17.4%rank 348 | 18.6% |
| Offensive reboundsRebound rate · decides 21% of the margin | 30.9%rank 276 | 32.6%rank 287 | 31.7% |
| Free throwsFree throws per FG attempt · decides 10% of the margin | 29.4%rank 4 | 25.1%rank 144 | 25.2% |
Defence is what opponents managed. For turnovers a high defence figure is good; for the others, low is good.
Luck so far
- Wins against the pre-game chances
- 1.0 won, 0.9 expected (+0.1)
- Opponents' three-point shooting
- +0.3 points a game (they shot 31.8%, league 32.3%)
- Opponents' free throws
- +4.9 points a game
- Close games: by 5 or fewer, or overtime
- None yet
Opponents' three-point shooting repeats little from one half of a season to the other (correlation 0.21), and their free throws even less (0.18), so a team living off either is likely to come back toward average. Positive numbers mean the luck has helped.
Rating this season
- Preseason net rating
- +10.5
- Last season's net rating
- +15.5
- Last season's minutes returning
- 21%
- Transfers in, weighted by minutes
- +8.1
- Change since preseason
- −0.9
- Offence, points per 100 possessions
- 111.3 (rank 71)
- Defence, points allowed per 100
- 101.7 (rank 98)
- Tempo, possessions per 40 minutes
- 71.4 (rank 185)
- Schedule so far, opponents' average
- −6.0 (rank 163)
Big Ten Conference by rating
| # | Team | Record | Conference | Net | Offence | Defence | National rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Illinois | 1-0 | 0-0 | +29.6 | 123.2 | 93.5 | 5 |
| 2 | Michigan | 1-0 | 0-0 | +28.1 | 120.5 | 92.4 | 6 |
| 3 | Michigan State | 1-0 | 0-0 | +27.6 | 119.4 | 91.7 | 8 |
| 4 | Nebraska | 1-0 | 0-0 | +23.7 | 117.8 | 94.0 | 15 |
| 5 | Purdue | 0-1 | 0-0 | +21.9 | 119.2 | 97.3 | 17 |
| 6 | Iowa | 1-0 | 0-0 | +21.6 | 117.5 | 96.0 | 20 |
| 7 | UCLA | 1-0 | 0-0 | +21.4 | 117.1 | 95.7 | 21 |
| 8 | Ohio State | 0-1 | 0-0 | +17.8 | 118.7 | 100.8 | 34 |
| 9 | Indiana | 1-0 | 0-0 | +16.6 | 113.9 | 97.3 | 40 |
| 10 | Wisconsin | 1-0 | 0-0 | +16.6 | 114.7 | 98.1 | 41 |
| 11 | Maryland | 1-0 | 0-0 | +15.8 | 114.4 | 98.7 | 43 |
| 12 | Oregon | 1-0 | 0-0 | +15.3 | 113.2 | 97.8 | 47 |
| 13 | USC | 1-0 | 0-0 | +15.3 | 112.6 | 97.2 | 48 |
| 14 | Northwestern | 1-0 | 0-0 | +12.8 | 113.0 | 100.3 | 61 |
| 15 | Minnesota | 1-0 | 0-0 | +12.0 | 110.3 | 98.3 | 65 |
| 16 | Penn State | 1-0 | 0-0 | +11.1 | 112.4 | 101.3 | 68 |
| 17 | Rutgers | 0-0 | 0-0 | +10.2 | 110.9 | 100.7 | 75 |
| 18 | Washington | 1-0 | 0-0 | +9.6 | 111.3 | 101.7 | 81 |