UCLA Bruins
Next: vs North Florida · Fri 6 Nov, 10:30 PM ETProjected 92-62 · Game page
Makes the tournament81%From 20,000 simulated seasons · average seed 5.3
Wins the national title1%Final Four 5% · projected 23-10
Net rating+21.4Rank 21 of 365 · offence 21, defence 26
Season outlook
- Projected record
- 23-10 (18 to 28 wins)
- Projected conference record
- 12-8
- Wins or shares the conference title
- 6%
- Wins the conference tournament
- 5%
- Average seed if in the field
- 5.3
- A 1 seed
- 2%
- Makes the field81%
- Round of 3263%
- Sweet 1631%
- Elite Eight13%
- Final Four5%
- Title game2%
- Champion1%
Schedule and results
| Date | Opponent | Where | Win chance | Projected | Result | Pick |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mon 2 Nov | vs Arizonarank 16 | Neutral | 38% | 67-71 | W 84-75 | Wrong |
| Fri 6 Nov10:30 PM ET | vs North Floridarank 275 | Home | 99% | 92-62 | — | |
| Wed 11 Nov12 AM ET | vs Arkansas-Pine Bluffrank 357 | Home | 100% | 95-57 | — |
Rooting guide
- Fri 6 Nov: vs North FloridaA win: 81% · a loss: 84%−3 pts
Early in the season other teams' results barely move a team's chances, so the list is mostly its own games; by February the bubble and conference races make other games matter.
Players
| Player | Games | Minutes | Points | Rebounds | Assists | Rating | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nikola KusturicaF | 1 | 39.0 | 9.0 | 5.0 | 2.0 | +0.8 | +2.0 |
| Jaylen PettyG · transfer from Texas Tech | 1 | 38.0 | 13.0 | 7.0 | 7.0 | +5.0 | +4.7 |
| Eric Dailey Jr.F | 1 | 34.0 | 13.0 | 8.0 | 2.0 | +6.2 | +4.9 |
| Trent PerryG | 1 | 25.0 | 21.0 | 3.0 | 5.0 | +6.6 | +3.8 |
| Azavier RobinsonG · transfer from Butler | 1 | 16.0 | 4.0 | 2.0 | 0.0 | +3.9 | +1.7 |
| Xavier BookerC | 1 | 13.0 | 8.0 | 3.0 | 0.0 | +6.7 | +2.0 |
| Sergej MacuraF · transfer from Mississippi St | 1 | 13.0 | 7.0 | 2.0 | 0.0 | +4.0 | +1.4 |
| Joe Philon IIIF | 1 | 12.0 | 7.0 | 4.0 | 0.0 | +1.5 | +0.8 |
| Brandon WilliamsF | 1 | 11.0 | 2.0 | 3.0 | 0.0 | +4.4 | +1.2 |
Style and luck
Every teamThe Four Factors adjusted for opponents
| Offence | Defence | League | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ShootingEffective FG% · decides 44% of the margin | 49.4%rank 293 | 49.1%rank 53 | 50.4% |
| TurnoversTurnover rate · decides 25% of the margin | 17.0%rank 11 | 17.9%rank 300 | 18.6% |
| Offensive reboundsRebound rate · decides 21% of the margin | 32.0%rank 107 | 31.3%rank 119 | 31.7% |
| Free throwsFree throws per FG attempt · decides 10% of the margin | 25.7%rank 98 | 27.7%rank 339 | 25.2% |
Defence is what opponents managed. For turnovers a high defence figure is good; for the others, low is good.
Luck so far
- Wins against the pre-game chances
- 1.0 won, 0.4 expected (+0.6)
- Opponents' three-point shooting
- +8.1 points a game (they shot 23.3%, league 32.3%)
- Opponents' free throws
- −3.3 points a game
- Close games: by 5 or fewer, or overtime
- None yet
Opponents' three-point shooting repeats little from one half of a season to the other (correlation 0.21), and their free throws even less (0.18), so a team living off either is likely to come back toward average. Positive numbers mean the luck has helped.
Rating this season
- Preseason net rating
- +19.7
- Last season's net rating
- +20.6
- Last season's minutes returning
- 48%
- Transfers in, weighted by minutes
- +6.6
- Change since preseason
- +1.7
- Offence, points per 100 possessions
- 117.1 (rank 21)
- Defence, points allowed per 100
- 95.7 (rank 26)
- Tempo, possessions per 40 minutes
- 70.4 (rank 295)
- Schedule so far, opponents' average
- +22.8 (rank 15)
Big Ten Conference by rating
| # | Team | Record | Conference | Net | Offence | Defence | National rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Illinois | 1-0 | 0-0 | +29.6 | 123.2 | 93.5 | 5 |
| 2 | Michigan | 1-0 | 0-0 | +28.1 | 120.5 | 92.4 | 6 |
| 3 | Michigan State | 1-0 | 0-0 | +27.6 | 119.4 | 91.7 | 8 |
| 4 | Nebraska | 1-0 | 0-0 | +23.7 | 117.8 | 94.0 | 15 |
| 5 | Purdue | 0-1 | 0-0 | +21.9 | 119.2 | 97.3 | 17 |
| 6 | Iowa | 1-0 | 0-0 | +21.6 | 117.5 | 96.0 | 20 |
| 7 | UCLA | 1-0 | 0-0 | +21.4 | 117.1 | 95.7 | 21 |
| 8 | Ohio State | 0-1 | 0-0 | +17.8 | 118.7 | 100.8 | 34 |
| 9 | Indiana | 1-0 | 0-0 | +16.6 | 113.9 | 97.3 | 40 |
| 10 | Wisconsin | 1-0 | 0-0 | +16.6 | 114.7 | 98.1 | 41 |
| 11 | Maryland | 1-0 | 0-0 | +15.8 | 114.4 | 98.7 | 43 |
| 12 | Oregon | 1-0 | 0-0 | +15.3 | 113.2 | 97.8 | 47 |
| 13 | USC | 1-0 | 0-0 | +15.3 | 112.6 | 97.2 | 48 |
| 14 | Northwestern | 1-0 | 0-0 | +12.8 | 113.0 | 100.3 | 61 |
| 15 | Minnesota | 1-0 | 0-0 | +12.0 | 110.3 | 98.3 | 65 |
| 16 | Penn State | 1-0 | 0-0 | +11.1 | 112.4 | 101.3 | 68 |
| 17 | Rutgers | 0-0 | 0-0 | +10.2 | 110.9 | 100.7 | 75 |
| 18 | Washington | 1-0 | 0-0 | +9.6 | 111.3 | 101.7 | 81 |