Indiana Hoosiers
Next: vs Bellarmine · Thu 5 Nov, 6 PM ETProjected 90-61 · Game page
Makes the tournament52%From 20,000 simulated seasons · average seed 6.5
Wins the national title<1%Final Four 1% · projected 19-14
Net rating+16.6Rank 40 of 365 · offence 44, defence 41
Season outlook
- Projected record
- 19-14 (14 to 25 wins)
- Projected conference record
- 9-11
- Wins or shares the conference title
- 1%
- Wins the conference tournament
- 1%
- Average seed if in the field
- 6.5
- A 1 seed
- <1%
- Makes the field52%
- Round of 3233%
- Sweet 1612%
- Elite Eight4%
- Final Four1%
- Title game<1%
- Champion<1%
Schedule and results
| Date | Opponent | Where | Win chance | Projected | Result | Pick |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mon 2 Nov | vs Eastern Illinoisrank 328 | Home | 98% | 79-52 | W 91-57 | Right |
| Thu 5 Nov6 PM ET | vs Bellarminerank 317 | Home | 99% | 90-61 | Live | |
| Mon 9 Nov6:30 PM ET | vs Syracuserank 67 | Neutral | 64% | 77-73 | — | |
| Thu 12 Nov6:30 PM ET | vs Tennessee Techrank 280 | Home | 99% | 90-63 | — |
Rooting guide
- Thu 5 Nov: vs BellarmineA win: 52% · a loss: 52%0 pts
- Mon 9 Nov: vs SyracuseA win: 54% · a loss: 47%+7 pts
- Thu 12 Nov: vs Tennessee TechA win: 52% · a loss: 50%+2 pts
Early in the season other teams' results barely move a team's chances, so the list is mostly its own games; by February the bubble and conference races make other games matter.
Players
| Player | Games | Minutes | Points | Rebounds | Assists | Rating | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aiden SherrellF · transfer from Alabama | 1 | 25.0 | 9.0 | 6.0 | 1.0 | +7.4 | +4.2 |
| Jaeden MustafG · transfer from Georgia Tech | 1 | 24.0 | 8.0 | 3.0 | 2.0 | +0.8 | +1.2 |
| Markus BurtonG · transfer from Notre Dame | 1 | 24.0 | 19.0 | 2.0 | 5.0 | +3.8 | +2.5 |
| Bryce LindsayG · transfer from Villanova | 1 | 24.0 | 14.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | +3.1 | +2.2 |
| Darren HarrisG · transfer from Duke | 1 | 23.0 | 7.0 | 4.0 | 1.0 | +4.4 | +2.6 |
| Samet YigitogluC · transfer from SMU | 1 | 18.0 | 8.0 | 7.0 | 1.0 | +4.2 | +2.0 |
| Trent SisleyF | 1 | 16.0 | 7.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | +2.6 | +1.3 |
| Sam AlexisF | 1 | 15.0 | 6.0 | 1.0 | 2.0 | +5.9 | +2.1 |
| Trevor ManhertzF | 1 | 15.0 | 11.0 | 2.0 | 0.0 | −0.6 | +0.4 |
| Vaughn KarvalaF | 1 | 6.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | −0.4 | +0.2 |
| Drew SnivelyG | 1 | 4.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | +2.0 | +0.3 |
| Clemens SokolovC | 1 | 4.0 | 2.0 | 3.0 | 0.0 | −0.3 | +0.1 |
| Justin MondenG · transfer from MD Eastern | 1 | 2.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | −3.3 | 0.0 |
Style and luck
Every teamThe Four Factors adjusted for opponents
| Offence | Defence | League | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ShootingEffective FG% · decides 44% of the margin | 50.8%rank 112 | 51.5%rank 301 | 50.4% |
| TurnoversTurnover rate · decides 25% of the margin | 18.5%rank 145 | 20.2%rank 14 | 18.6% |
| Offensive reboundsRebound rate · decides 21% of the margin | 32.2%rank 102 | 30.5%rank 61 | 31.7% |
| Free throwsFree throws per FG attempt · decides 10% of the margin | 27.3%rank 40 | 23.2%rank 38 | 25.2% |
Defence is what opponents managed. For turnovers a high defence figure is good; for the others, low is good.
Luck so far
- Wins against the pre-game chances
- 1.0 won, 1.0 expected (0.0)
- Opponents' three-point shooting
- +4.6 points a game (they shot 21.4%, league 32.3%)
- Opponents' free throws
- +0.8 points a game
- Close games: by 5 or fewer, or overtime
- None yet
Opponents' three-point shooting repeats little from one half of a season to the other (correlation 0.21), and their free throws even less (0.18), so a team living off either is likely to come back toward average. Positive numbers mean the luck has helped.
Rating this season
- Preseason net rating
- +15.6
- Last season's net rating
- +19.1
- Last season's minutes returning
- 17%
- Transfers in, weighted by minutes
- +8.9
- Change since preseason
- +1.0
- Offence, points per 100 possessions
- 113.9 (rank 44)
- Defence, points allowed per 100
- 97.3 (rank 41)
- Tempo, possessions per 40 minutes
- 70.8 (rank 252)
- Schedule so far, opponents' average
- −15.9 (rank 259)
Big Ten Conference by rating
| # | Team | Record | Conference | Net | Offence | Defence | National rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Illinois | 1-0 | 0-0 | +29.6 | 123.2 | 93.5 | 5 |
| 2 | Michigan | 1-0 | 0-0 | +28.1 | 120.5 | 92.4 | 6 |
| 3 | Michigan State | 1-0 | 0-0 | +27.6 | 119.4 | 91.7 | 8 |
| 4 | Nebraska | 1-0 | 0-0 | +23.7 | 117.8 | 94.0 | 15 |
| 5 | Purdue | 0-1 | 0-0 | +21.9 | 119.2 | 97.3 | 17 |
| 6 | Iowa | 1-0 | 0-0 | +21.6 | 117.5 | 96.0 | 20 |
| 7 | UCLA | 1-0 | 0-0 | +21.4 | 117.1 | 95.7 | 21 |
| 8 | Ohio State | 0-1 | 0-0 | +17.8 | 118.7 | 100.8 | 34 |
| 9 | Indiana | 1-0 | 0-0 | +16.6 | 113.9 | 97.3 | 40 |
| 10 | Wisconsin | 1-0 | 0-0 | +16.6 | 114.7 | 98.1 | 41 |
| 11 | Maryland | 1-0 | 0-0 | +15.8 | 114.4 | 98.7 | 43 |
| 12 | Oregon | 1-0 | 0-0 | +15.3 | 113.2 | 97.8 | 47 |
| 13 | USC | 1-0 | 0-0 | +15.3 | 112.6 | 97.2 | 48 |
| 14 | Northwestern | 1-0 | 0-0 | +12.8 | 113.0 | 100.3 | 61 |
| 15 | Minnesota | 1-0 | 0-0 | +12.0 | 110.3 | 98.3 | 65 |
| 16 | Penn State | 1-0 | 0-0 | +11.1 | 112.4 | 101.3 | 68 |
| 17 | Rutgers | 0-0 | 0-0 | +10.2 | 110.9 | 100.7 | 75 |
| 18 | Washington | 1-0 | 0-0 | +9.6 | 111.3 | 101.7 | 81 |