Penn State Nittany Lions
Makes the tournament8%From 20,000 simulated seasons · average seed 9.0
Wins the national title0%Final Four <1% · projected 15-16
Net rating+8.8Rank 82 of 365 · offence 41, defence 143
Season outlook
- Projected record
- 15-16 (11 to 20 wins)
- Projected conference record
- 6-14
- Wins or shares the conference title
- <1%
- Wins the conference tournament
- <1%
- Average seed if in the field
- 9.0
- A 1 seed
- 0%
- Makes the field8%
- Round of 323%
- Sweet 161%
- Elite Eight<1%
- Final Four<1%
- Title game0%
- Champion0%
Schedule and results
| Date | Opponent | Where | Win chance | Projected | Result | Pick |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mon 2 Nov | vs Canisiusrank 363 | Home | 98% | 80-54 | W 97-57 | Right |
| Thu 5 Nov | vs Chattanoogarank 193 | Home | 95% | 87-68 | W 97-93 | Right |
| Sun 8 Nov8 PM ET | vs Pittsburghrank 86 | Neutral | 53% | 77-76 | — | |
| Thu 12 Nov6:30 PM ET | vs Mercyhurstrank 335 | Home | 98% | 89-64 | — |
Rooting guide
- Sun 8 Nov: vs PittsburghA win: 9% · a loss: 6%+3 pts
- Thu 12 Nov: vs MercyhurstA win: 8% · a loss: 8%0 pts
Early in the season other teams' results barely move a team's chances, so the list is mostly its own games; by February the bubble and conference races make other games matter.
Players
| Player | Games | Minutes | Points | Rebounds | Assists | Rating | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dasonte BowenG · transfer from St Bonaventure | 2 | 30.5 | 9.0 | 5.5 | 3.0 | +1.1 | +1.8 |
| Josh ReedF | 2 | 27.0 | 18.5 | 3.5 | 0.5 | +3.2 | +2.6 |
| Brant ByersF · transfer from Miami OH | 2 | 27.0 | 7.0 | 1.5 | 3.5 | +2.8 | +2.4 |
| Thomas AllardG | 2 | 26.0 | 8.0 | 4.0 | 1.0 | +0.3 | +1.1 |
| Ivan JuricF | 2 | 23.5 | 14.5 | 12.5 | 0.5 | +2.0 | +1.7 |
| Roko PrkacinF | 2 | 22.0 | 20.5 | 6.0 | 2.5 | +0.7 | +1.1 |
| Francois WibautF | 2 | 19.0 | 12.0 | 3.5 | 2.0 | +0.7 | +0.9 |
| Roberts BlumsG · transfer from Davidson | 1 | 19.0 | 5.0 | 4.0 | 4.0 | +5.0 | +2.4 |
| Jay RodgersG · transfer from C Connecticut | 2 | 7.0 | 1.0 | 0.5 | 1.5 | +0.7 | +0.3 |
| Tim ObohF · transfer from Buffalo | 2 | 4.0 | 1.5 | 0.0 | 0.0 | +3.5 | +0.4 |
| Andy GemaoG | 1 | 4.0 | 2.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | +1.5 | +0.2 |
| Reggie GrodinG | 1 | 3.0 | 2.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | +1.5 | +0.2 |
| Grant SpacciapolliG | 1 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | +1.6 | +0.1 |
| Aleksandar ZecevicF | 1 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | +1.6 | +0.1 |
Style and luck
Every teamThe Four Factors adjusted for opponents
| Offence | Defence | League | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ShootingEffective FG% · decides 44% of the margin | 50.4%rank 211 | 52.0%rank 326 | 50.4% |
| TurnoversTurnover rate · decides 25% of the margin | 18.4%rank 145 | 17.8%rank 317 | 18.5% |
| Offensive reboundsRebound rate · decides 21% of the margin | 34.3%rank 20 | 32.0%rank 253 | 31.8% |
| Free throwsFree throws per FG attempt · decides 10% of the margin | 33.1%rank 1 | 23.4%rank 47 | 25.3% |
Defence is what opponents managed. For turnovers a high defence figure is good; for the others, low is good.
Luck so far
- Wins against the pre-game chances
- 2.0 won, 1.9 expected (+0.1)
- Opponents' three-point shooting
- +2.7 points a game (they shot 28.8%, league 32.3%)
- Opponents' free throws
- +1.6 points a game
- Close games: by 5 or fewer, or overtime
- 1-0
Opponents' three-point shooting repeats little from one half of a season to the other (correlation 0.21), and their free throws even less (0.18), so a team living off either is likely to come back toward average. Positive numbers mean the luck has helped.
Rating this season
- Preseason net rating
- +7.9
- Last season's net rating
- +1.8
- Last season's minutes returning
- 26%
- Transfers in, weighted by minutes
- +0.4
- Change since preseason
- +0.9
- Offence, points per 100 possessions
- 114.4 (rank 41)
- Defence, points allowed per 100
- 105.5 (rank 143)
- Tempo, possessions per 40 minutes
- 71.8 (rank 119)
- Schedule so far, opponents' average
- −14.9 (rank 249)
Big Ten Conference by rating
| # | Team | Record | Conference | Net | Offence | Defence | National rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Illinois | 1-0 | 0-0 | +29.6 | 123.3 | 93.6 | 5 |
| 2 | Michigan | 1-0 | 0-0 | +28.1 | 120.6 | 92.5 | 6 |
| 3 | Michigan State | 1-0 | 0-0 | +27.7 | 119.5 | 91.8 | 8 |
| 4 | Nebraska | 1-0 | 0-0 | +23.7 | 117.9 | 94.1 | 15 |
| 5 | Purdue | 0-1 | 0-0 | +21.9 | 119.2 | 97.3 | 18 |
| 6 | Iowa | 1-0 | 0-0 | +21.6 | 117.6 | 96.1 | 20 |
| 7 | UCLA | 1-0 | 0-0 | +21.4 | 117.2 | 95.8 | 21 |
| 8 | Ohio State | 0-1 | 0-0 | +17.8 | 118.8 | 100.9 | 34 |
| 9 | Wisconsin | 1-0 | 0-0 | +16.6 | 114.8 | 98.2 | 40 |
| 10 | Indiana | 2-0 | 0-0 | +16.1 | 115.3 | 99.2 | 42 |
| 11 | Maryland | 1-0 | 0-0 | +15.8 | 114.5 | 98.7 | 43 |
| 12 | Oregon | 1-0 | 0-0 | +15.3 | 113.2 | 97.9 | 47 |
| 13 | USC | 1-0 | 0-0 | +15.3 | 112.7 | 97.3 | 48 |
| 14 | Northwestern | 1-0 | 0-0 | +12.8 | 113.1 | 100.4 | 61 |
| 15 | Minnesota | 1-0 | 0-0 | +12.0 | 110.4 | 98.4 | 65 |
| 16 | Rutgers | 0-0 | 0-0 | +10.2 | 111.0 | 100.8 | 74 |
| 17 | Washington | 1-0 | 0-0 | +9.6 | 111.4 | 101.8 | 79 |
| 18 | Penn State | 2-0 | 0-0 | +8.8 | 114.4 | 105.5 | 82 |