Purdue Boilermakers
Next: vs Valparaiso · Fri 6 Nov, 6:30 PM ETProjected 84-63 · Game page
Makes the tournament79%From 20,000 simulated seasons · average seed 4.7
Wins the national title1%Final Four 6% · projected 22-12
Net rating+21.9Rank 17 of 365 · offence 10, defence 40
Season outlook
- Projected record
- 22-12 (16 to 27 wins)
- Projected conference record
- 12-8
- Wins or shares the conference title
- 7%
- Wins the conference tournament
- 6%
- Average seed if in the field
- 4.7
- A 1 seed
- 5%
- Makes the field79%
- Round of 3265%
- Sweet 1634%
- Elite Eight15%
- Final Four6%
- Title game2%
- Champion1%
Schedule and results
| Date | Opponent | Where | Win chance | Projected | Result | Pick |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mon 2 Nov | vs Gonzagarank 27 | Neutral | 58% | 70-68 | L 72-78 | Wrong |
| Fri 6 Nov6:30 PM ET | vs Valparaisorank 125 | Home | 96% | 84-63 | — | |
| Mon 9 Nov8:30 PM ET | vs Illinois Staterank 123 | Home | 95% | 85-65 | — |
Rooting guide
- Fri 6 Nov: vs ValparaisoA win: 79% · a loss: 78%+2 pts
- Mon 9 Nov: vs Illinois StateA win: 79% · a loss: 80%0 pts
Early in the season other teams' results barely move a team's chances, so the list is mostly its own games; by February the bubble and conference races make other games matter.
Players
| Player | Games | Minutes | Points | Rebounds | Assists | Rating | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C.J. CoxG | 1 | 36.0 | 11.0 | 3.0 | 2.0 | +6.0 | +5.0 |
| Caden PierceF | 1 | 29.0 | 7.0 | 6.0 | 3.0 | +0.9 | +1.5 |
| Gicarri HarrisG | 1 | 28.0 | 8.0 | 4.0 | 2.0 | +6.0 | +3.9 |
| Daniel JacobsenC | 1 | 27.0 | 22.0 | 7.0 | 2.0 | +7.8 | +4.6 |
| Omer MayerG | 1 | 25.0 | 8.0 | 2.0 | 5.0 | +5.2 | +3.2 |
| Antione West JrG | 1 | 20.0 | 10.0 | 1.0 | 3.0 | +1.1 | +1.1 |
| Jack BenterG | 1 | 11.0 | 0.0 | 4.0 | 0.0 | +6.3 | +1.6 |
| Luke ErtelG | 1 | 10.0 | 2.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | +1.3 | +0.6 |
| Enzo ShahrvinF | 1 | 8.0 | 2.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | +1.4 | +0.5 |
| Raleigh BurgessF | 1 | 5.0 | 2.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | +1.5 | +0.3 |
Style and luck
Every teamThe Four Factors adjusted for opponents
| Offence | Defence | League | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ShootingEffective FG% · decides 44% of the margin | 50.6%rank 115 | 50.2%rank 131 | 50.4% |
| TurnoversTurnover rate · decides 25% of the margin | 17.9%rank 61 | 17.9%rank 302 | 18.6% |
| Offensive reboundsRebound rate · decides 21% of the margin | 30.3%rank 314 | 31.3%rank 126 | 31.7% |
| Free throwsFree throws per FG attempt · decides 10% of the margin | 25.5%rank 111 | 28.9%rank 358 | 25.2% |
Defence is what opponents managed. For turnovers a high defence figure is good; for the others, low is good.
Luck so far
- Wins against the pre-game chances
- 0.0 won, 0.6 expected (−0.6)
- Opponents' three-point shooting
- −2.5 points a game (they shot 37.5%, league 32.3%)
- Opponents' free throws
- −2.6 points a game
- Close games: by 5 or fewer, or overtime
- None yet
Opponents' three-point shooting repeats little from one half of a season to the other (correlation 0.21), and their free throws even less (0.18), so a team living off either is likely to come back toward average. Positive numbers mean the luck has helped.
Rating this season
- Preseason net rating
- +22.9
- Last season's net rating
- +31.6
- Last season's minutes returning
- 41%
- Transfers in, weighted by minutes
- 0.0
- Change since preseason
- −1.1
- Offence, points per 100 possessions
- 119.2 (rank 10)
- Defence, points allowed per 100
- 97.3 (rank 40)
- Tempo, possessions per 40 minutes
- 69.7 (rank 345)
- Schedule so far, opponents' average
- +20.5 (rank 25)
Big Ten Conference by rating
| # | Team | Record | Conference | Net | Offence | Defence | National rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Illinois | 1-0 | 0-0 | +29.6 | 123.2 | 93.5 | 5 |
| 2 | Michigan | 1-0 | 0-0 | +28.1 | 120.5 | 92.4 | 6 |
| 3 | Michigan State | 1-0 | 0-0 | +27.6 | 119.4 | 91.7 | 8 |
| 4 | Nebraska | 1-0 | 0-0 | +23.7 | 117.8 | 94.0 | 15 |
| 5 | Purdue | 0-1 | 0-0 | +21.9 | 119.2 | 97.3 | 17 |
| 6 | Iowa | 1-0 | 0-0 | +21.6 | 117.5 | 96.0 | 20 |
| 7 | UCLA | 1-0 | 0-0 | +21.4 | 117.1 | 95.7 | 21 |
| 8 | Ohio State | 0-1 | 0-0 | +17.8 | 118.7 | 100.8 | 34 |
| 9 | Indiana | 1-0 | 0-0 | +16.6 | 113.9 | 97.3 | 40 |
| 10 | Wisconsin | 1-0 | 0-0 | +16.6 | 114.7 | 98.1 | 41 |
| 11 | Maryland | 1-0 | 0-0 | +15.8 | 114.4 | 98.7 | 43 |
| 12 | Oregon | 1-0 | 0-0 | +15.3 | 113.2 | 97.8 | 47 |
| 13 | USC | 1-0 | 0-0 | +15.3 | 112.6 | 97.2 | 48 |
| 14 | Northwestern | 1-0 | 0-0 | +12.8 | 113.0 | 100.3 | 61 |
| 15 | Minnesota | 1-0 | 0-0 | +12.0 | 110.3 | 98.3 | 65 |
| 16 | Penn State | 1-0 | 0-0 | +11.1 | 112.4 | 101.3 | 68 |
| 17 | Rutgers | 0-0 | 0-0 | +10.2 | 110.9 | 100.7 | 75 |
| 18 | Washington | 1-0 | 0-0 | +9.6 | 111.3 | 101.7 | 81 |