Probable Stats
Menu

LMU v Alabama A&M

Women's · Friday, November 13, 2026, 7:30 PM ET at Stan Sheriff Center. LMU our rank 95 · 3-0; Alabama A&M our rank 329 · 1-2.

Who will win LMU vs Alabama A&M?

Logged before tip-off; never changed after it.

The model gives Loyola Marymount a 96% chance to beat Alabama A&M, with a projected score of LMU 76, Alabama A&M 53.

To winLMU 96%Alabama A&M 4%
Projected score76–53LMU, then Alabama A&M
Margin23.3LMU · no line posted
Total129.3no line posted
First half37–24LMU ahead 89%
LMU by 50by 40by 30by 20by 10EvenAlabama A&M by 10Model: LMU by 23.3LMU by 50by 30by 10Alabama A&M by 10Model: LMU by 23.3

Half of games like thisFour in five

Calls of 90–100% have been right 96.1% of the time in 10,929 past games, and the typical miss on the margin is 9.5 points. After the final, the result is pinned to this strip. As of 2:23 AM ET on November 13, 2026. Updated three times a day until tip-off.

Players to watch

our projection, not a sportsbook's
PlayerPtsRebAstLast gamesChance of
LMU
HernandezF · 22 min13.04.02.315+ 37%
NordstromG · 25 min12.53.22.610+ 65%
JonesF · 21 min10.26.21.610+ 49%
PowellG · 19 min10.02.31.510+ 49%
Alabama A&M
NicholsonF · 26 min7.37.50.55+ 68%
WhiteG · 26 min6.62.21.75+ 62%
WimberlyG · 20 min5.51.90.85+ 51%
KelleyG · 17 min5.30.90.35+ 49%

Bars: points in the player's latest games this season. Blue line: tonight's projection. Every regular's line

The game without one player

Pick a regular to sit her

Without Maya Hernandez: LMU 94%Alabama A&M 6%

The white mark is the call with her: LMU 96%.

PlayerPoints a game she addsLMU without herChangeProjected score
LMU
Maya Hernandez2.894%−275–54
Shawnee Nordstrom1.895%−175–54
Kayla Jones1.695%−176–54
Danae Powell1.595%−176–54

Change is in LMU's win chance, in points. Scores read LMU, then Alabama A&M. A player's value is what the team is better by with her than with a replacement, from the player ratings.

Play-by-play

    Team numbers

    Form

    Each team's last five before this game

    LMU 3-0WWW

    1. Nov 10W 118-37vs La Sierra
    2. Nov 6W 70-45at Utah State
    3. Nov 2W 89-64vs Nevada
    Last 3
    3–0, scoring 92.3 and allowing 48.7

    Alabama A&M 1-2LLW

    1. Nov 9W 81-61vs Miles
    2. Nov 5L 43-96at Alabama
    3. Nov 2L 53-59vs Talladega
    Last 3
    1–2, scoring 59.0 and allowing 72.0

    The spread and the total are the lines logged with each prediction. Form is what happened; the ratings above already count recent games more.

    Offense against defense

    Adjusted for opponents · rank of 363
    LMUAlabama A&M
    Points scored per 100 possessions98.3 88th78.0 336th
    Points allowed per 10090.6 118th99.1 283rd
    Possessions a game72.1 164th71.5 225th
    Shooting (effective field-goal %)46.9% 99th44.4% 260th
    Opponents' shooting46.2% 226th48.7% 334th
    Turnovers, share of possessions22.5% 100th23.7% 198th
    Offensive rebounds, share of misses33.9% 125th31.3% 264th
    Free throws per shot0.22 140th0.21 199th

    The widest gap: LMU's defense (118th) against Alabama A&M's offense (336th), of 363 teams.

    First half

    Projected from the full-game numbers

    Ahead at halftime

    Projected halftime score
    LMU 37, Alabama A&M 24
    First-half margin
    LMU by 13.4
    First-half points, both teams
    61.3
    Projected second half
    LMU 39, Alabama A&M 29
    Second-half points, both teams
    68.0
    Tied at the half
    4%
    LMU, first halves so far
    Led 3 of 3 · 44.7 scored, 23.7 allowed
    Alabama A&M, first halves so far
    Led 1 of 3 · 28.7 scored, 34.7 allowed

    Our own projection, not a sportsbook's first-half line. On 10,911 past games it had not seen, the halftime leader was right 73.0% of the time and the first-half total was off by 8.0 points on average. This season: 404 of 492 halftime leaders right. Scorecard

    Player projections

    Each player's projected line for this game

    LMU

    PlayerMinPtsRebAst3s
    Shawnee NordstromG2512.53.22.61.7
    10+ pts 65% · 3+ ast 46% · 2+ threes 46%
    Maya HernandezF2213.04.02.30.1
    15+ pts 37% · 4+ reb 53% · 3+ ast 40%
    Kayla JonesF2110.26.21.60.3
    10+ pts 49% · 6+ reb 55% · 2+ ast 45%
    Allison ClarkeG204.91.51.21.1
    5+ pts 45% · 2+ reb 41% · 1+ threes 60%
    Ivana KrajinaG207.61.62.50.5
    5+ pts 70% · 2+ reb 43% · 3+ ast 43%
    Danae PowellG1910.02.31.51.1
    10+ pts 49% · 2+ reb 60% · 2+ ast 41%
    Sarah DengG182.83.21.00.3
    5+ pts 23% · 3+ reb 57% · 2+ ast 28%
    Ali'a MatavaoF155.54.11.00.1
    5+ pts 51% · 4+ reb 54% · 2+ ast 28%

    Alabama A&M

    PlayerMinPtsRebAst3s
    Asianae NicholsonF267.37.50.50.0
    5+ pts 68% · 8+ reb 46%
    Skylar WhiteG266.62.21.70.5
    5+ pts 62% · 2+ reb 59% · 2+ ast 47%
    Alisha MurrayG205.23.31.10.3
    5+ pts 48% · 3+ reb 59% · 2+ ast 30%
    Tazi HarrisF204.63.30.60.1
    5+ pts 42% · 3+ reb 58%
    Vanessa WimberlyG205.51.90.80.7
    5+ pts 51% · 2+ reb 52% · 1+ threes 46%
    Kalea RaineyG174.11.50.80.3
    5+ pts 37% · 2+ reb 40% · 1+ threes 27%
    Miracle AkpotayoboF173.43.10.50.1
    5+ pts 29% · 3+ reb 54%
    Janessa KelleyG175.30.90.31.0
    5+ pts 49% · 2+ reb 22% · 1+ threes 57%

    Our own projections from each player's minutes and production, this opponent and the game's pace: not a sportsbook's lines. Under each name, the round numbers the player is about as likely as not to reach. How they have done

    Why the model sees it this way

    The game in numbers

    The matchup

    More games on Fri, Nov 13

    All games
    1. 12 PMprojected 69-73Troy at Belmont, women's: game page
    2. 7 PMprojected 51-66Auburn at Texas Tech, women's: game page
    3. 7:30 PMprojected 60-72Marquette at Missouri St, women's: game page
    4. 8 PMprojected 71-69Gonzaga at Grand Canyon, women's: game page
    5. 8:30 PMprojected 73-68Utah at Boise St, women's: game page
    6. 10 PMprojected 70-74Stanford at Santa Clara, women's: game page