Who will win VMI vs Longwood?
The model gives Longwood a 66% chance to beat VMI, with a projected score of Longwood 78, VMI 73.
Half of games like thisFour in five
Calls of 60–70% have been right 64.8% of the time in 15,721 past games, and the typical miss on the margin is 8.8 points. After the final, the result is pinned to this strip. As of 2:23 AM ET on November 13, 2026. Updated three times a day until tip-off.
Players to watch
| Player | Pts | Reb | Ast | Last games | Chance of |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Billups IIIG · 28 min | 13.1 | 3.4 | 2.0 | 15+ 37% | |
| BenardG · 24 min | 12.1 | 6.2 | 1.8 | 10+ 62% | |
| WilliamsG · 24 min | 10.0 | 3.2 | 3.1 | 10+ 48% | |
| RobinsonG · 16 min | 8.9 | 2.3 | 2.0 | 10+ 40% | |
| JohnsonF · 30 min | 18.0 | 4.9 | 0.9 | 20+ 39% | |
| Bradley Jr.G · 30 min | 13.9 | 5.3 | 3.3 | 15+ 42% | |
| DaushviliF · 26 min | 9.3 | 7.2 | 0.9 | 10+ 43% | |
| JohnsonG · 26 min | 8.3 | 4.1 | 1.4 | 10+ 35% | |
Bars: points in the player's latest games this season. Blue line: tonight's projection. Every regular's line
Model against the line
Your call
All of today's gamesPlay-by-play
Team numbers
Form
VMI 2-2WLLW
- Nov 11W 65-51vs NC CentralCovered −7.5 · Under 147.5
- Nov 7L 68-70at UTSACovered +5.5 · Under 163.5
- Nov 5L 70-95at SMUDidn't cover +24.5 · Over 160.5
- Nov 2W 115-83vs Virginia Lynchburg
- Last 4
- 2–2, scoring 79.5 and allowing 74.8
- Against the spread, this season
- 2–1
- Totals, this season
- 1 over, 2 under
Longwood 3-1WLWW
- Nov 10W 101-45vs St. Mary's (MD)
- Nov 7W 80-75vs NC CentralDidn't cover −12.5 · Over 149.5
- Nov 4L 73-82at Saint Joseph's
- Nov 2W 123-67vs Pfeiffer
- Last 4
- 3–1, scoring 94.2 and allowing 67.2
- Against the spread, this season
- 0–1
- Totals, this season
- 1 over, 0 under
The spread and the total are the lines logged with each prediction. Form is what happened; the ratings above already count recent games more.
Offense against defense
| VMI | Longwood | |
|---|---|---|
| Points scored per 100 possessions | 97.5 309th | 102.0 227th |
| Points allowed per 100 | 110.1 231st | 112.0 289th |
| Possessions a game | 71.3 121st | 71.7 87th |
| Shooting (effective field-goal %) | 47.5% 347th | 50.8% 163rd |
| Opponents' shooting | 49.8% 135th | 50.9% 212th |
| Turnovers, share of possessions | 19.6% 322nd | 17.1% 80th |
| Offensive rebounds, share of misses | 34.5% 35th | 30.6% 256th |
| Free throws per shot | 0.29 51st | 0.23 314th |
First half
- Projected halftime score
- VMI 34, Longwood 37
- First-half margin
- Longwood by 2.6
- First-half points, both teams
- 70.7
- Projected second half
- VMI 39, Longwood 41
- Second-half points, both teams
- 79.9
- Tied at the half
- 4%
- VMI, first halves so far
- Led 3 of 4 · 38.8 scored, 32.8 allowed
- Longwood, first halves so far
- Led 3 of 4 · 42.8 scored, 28.0 allowed
Our own projection, not a sportsbook's first-half line. On 11,516 past games it had not seen, the halftime leader was right 67.2% of the time and the first-half total was off by 8.1 points on average. This season: 366 of 476 halftime leaders right. Scorecard
Player projections
VMI
| Player | Min | Pts | Reb | Ast | 3s |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rickey Bradley Jr.G | 30 | 13.9 | 5.3 | 3.3 | 1.2 |
| 15+ pts 42% · 5+ reb 57% · 4+ ast 42% | |||||
| TJ JohnsonF | 30 | 18.0 | 4.9 | 0.9 | 3.6 |
| 20+ pts 39% · 5+ reb 51% · 4+ threes 45% | |||||
| Trap JohnsonG | 26 | 8.3 | 4.1 | 1.4 | 1.5 |
| 10+ pts 35% · 4+ reb 54% · 2+ threes 41% | |||||
| Alexander DaushviliF | 26 | 9.3 | 7.2 | 0.9 | 0.7 |
| 10+ pts 43% · 7+ reb 54% · 1+ threes 47% | |||||
| Paulius NarvilasF | 24 | 6.5 | 4.9 | 0.7 | 0.3 |
| 5+ pts 60% · 5+ reb 50% · 1+ threes 24% | |||||
| Rokas ZilysG | 18 | 6.8 | 2.3 | 1.5 | 0.7 |
| 5+ pts 63% · 2+ ast 42% · 1+ threes 48% | |||||
| AJ ClarkG | 16 | 6.2 | 2.7 | 1.1 | 0.3 |
| 31% to play · 5+ pts 58% · 3+ reb 47% · 2+ ast 29% | |||||
| Joao PanzoF | 14 | 3.5 | 2.9 | 0.9 | 0.2 |
| 5+ pts 30% · 3+ reb 51% · 2+ ast 23% | |||||
Longwood
| Player | Min | Pts | Reb | Ast | 3s |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alphonzo Billups IIIG | 28 | 13.1 | 3.4 | 2.0 | 2.1 |
| 15+ pts 37% · 2+ ast 57% · 2+ threes 57% | |||||
| Jaylen BenardG | 24 | 12.1 | 6.2 | 1.8 | 1.5 |
| 10+ pts 62% · 6+ reb 55% · 2+ ast 50% | |||||
| MJ WilliamsG | 24 | 10.0 | 3.2 | 3.1 | 1.8 |
| 10+ pts 48% · 3+ reb 57% · 2+ threes 50% | |||||
| Lazar MilosevicF | 18 | 5.0 | 2.8 | 1.1 | 0.4 |
| 5+ pts 46% · 3+ reb 48% · 1+ threes 32% | |||||
| TJ RobinsonG | 16 | 8.9 | 2.3 | 2.0 | 0.4 |
| 10+ pts 40% · 2+ reb 60% · 2+ ast 57% | |||||
| Elijah KellyG | 16 | 3.6 | 3.1 | 0.8 | 0.4 |
| 5+ pts 32% · 3+ reb 56% · 1+ threes 34% | |||||
| Kany MusungayF | 16 | 4.5 | 4.0 | 0.5 | 0.5 |
| 5+ pts 40% · 4+ reb 53% · 1+ threes 36% | |||||
| Jorke AavG | 15 | 4.5 | 1.9 | 1.0 | 0.9 |
| 5+ pts 40% · 2+ reb 52% · 1+ threes 54% | |||||
Our own projections from each player's minutes and production, this opponent and the game's pace: not a sportsbook's lines. Under each name, the round numbers the player is about as likely as not to reach. How they have done
Win probability
Game chat
Loading the chat…