Gardner-Webb at VMI
Saturday, November 21, 2026, 12:00 PM ET at Cameron Hall. Gardner-Webb our rank 355 · 1-2; VMI our rank 288 · 2-2.
Who will win Gardner-Webb vs VMI?
The model gives VMI a 80% chance to beat Gardner-Webb, with a projected score of VMI 78, Gardner-Webb 68.
Half of games like thisFour in five
Calls of 80–90% have been right 84.9% of the time in 12,246 past games, and the typical miss on the margin is 8.8 points. After the final, the result is pinned to this strip. As of 2:23 AM ET on November 13, 2026. Updated three times a day until tip-off.
Players to watch
| Player | Pts | Reb | Ast | Last games | Chance of |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JohnsonF · 30 min | 18.8 | 5.1 | 1.0 | 20+ 43% | |
| Bradley Jr.G · 30 min | 14.5 | 5.6 | 3.7 | 15+ 46% | |
| DaushviliF · 26 min | 9.7 | 7.5 | 1.0 | 10+ 46% | |
| JohnsonG · 26 min | 8.7 | 4.3 | 1.6 | 10+ 38% | |
| BrownG · 25 min | 11.1 | 2.3 | 1.7 | 10+ 56% | |
| PocknettF · 25 min | 9.5 | 5.7 | 0.9 | 10+ 44% | |
| HudsonG · 23 min | 8.7 | 2.7 | 1.1 | 10+ 39% | |
| FerereG · 20 min | 8.3 | 2.7 | 1.0 | 10+ 36% | |
Bars: points in the player's latest games this season. Blue line: tonight's projection. Every regular's line
Model against the line
Your call
All of today's gamesPlay-by-play
Team numbers
Form
Gardner-Webb 1-2LLW
- Last 3
- 1–2, scoring 61.3 and allowing 83.3
- Against the spread, this season
- 0–1
- Totals, this season
- 0 over, 1 under
VMI 2-2WLLW
- Nov 11W 65-51vs NC CentralCovered −7.5 · Under 147.5
- Nov 7L 68-70at UTSACovered +5.5 · Under 163.5
- Nov 5L 70-95at SMUDidn't cover +24.5 · Over 160.5
- Nov 2W 115-83vs Virginia Lynchburg
- Last 4
- 2–2, scoring 79.5 and allowing 74.8
- Against the spread, this season
- 2–1
- Totals, this season
- 1 over, 2 under
The spread and the total are the lines logged with each prediction. Form is what happened; the ratings above already count recent games more.
Offense against defense
| Gardner-Webb | VMI | |
|---|---|---|
| Points scored per 100 possessions | 92.9 353rd | 97.5 309th |
| Points allowed per 100 | 114.7 332nd | 110.1 231st |
| Possessions a game | 71.6 95th | 71.3 121st |
| Shooting (effective field-goal %) | 48.0% 334th | 47.5% 347th |
| Opponents' shooting | 52.6% 316th | 49.8% 135th |
| Turnovers, share of possessions | 20.2% 346th | 19.6% 322nd |
| Offensive rebounds, share of misses | 26.9% 358th | 34.5% 35th |
| Free throws per shot | 0.29 46th | 0.29 51st |
The widest gap: VMI's defense (231st) against Gardner-Webb's offense (353rd), of 365 teams.
First half
- Projected halftime score
- Gardner-Webb 32, VMI 37
- First-half margin
- VMI by 5.3
- First-half points, both teams
- 68.5
- Projected second half
- Gardner-Webb 37, VMI 41
- Second-half points, both teams
- 77.5
- Tied at the half
- 4%
- Gardner-Webb, first halves so far
- Led 1 of 3 · 25.7 scored, 42.0 allowed
- VMI, first halves so far
- Led 3 of 4 · 38.8 scored, 32.8 allowed
Our own projection, not a sportsbook's first-half line. On 11,516 past games it had not seen, the halftime leader was right 67.2% of the time and the first-half total was off by 8.1 points on average. This season: 366 of 476 halftime leaders right. Scorecard
Player projections
Gardner-Webb
| Player | Min | Pts | Reb | Ast | 3s |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Seth BrownG | 25 | 11.1 | 2.3 | 1.7 | 2.1 |
| 10+ pts 56% · 2+ ast 48% · 2+ threes 56% | |||||
| Mikhali PocknettF | 25 | 9.5 | 5.7 | 0.9 | 0.1 |
| 10+ pts 44% · 6+ reb 48% · 2+ ast 24% | |||||
| Sam NosakhareC | 24 | 1.8 | 5.9 | 0.4 | 0.0 |
| 6+ reb 51% | |||||
| Jacob HudsonG | 23 | 8.7 | 2.7 | 1.1 | 0.6 |
| 10+ pts 39% · 3+ reb 46% · 1+ threes 45% | |||||
| Rue WellsG | 21 | 7.0 | 2.4 | 1.6 | 0.7 |
| 5+ pts 65% · 2+ ast 46% · 1+ threes 47% | |||||
| Jamias FerereG | 20 | 8.3 | 2.7 | 1.0 | 0.9 |
| 10+ pts 36% · 3+ reb 46% · 1+ threes 57% | |||||
| Ace TalbertG | 20 | 5.3 | 1.7 | 1.3 | 1.1 |
| 5+ pts 49% · 2+ reb 46% · 1+ threes 62% | |||||
| Jackson SkipperF | 20 | 5.4 | 3.2 | 0.9 | 1.1 |
| 5+ pts 50% · 3+ reb 56% · 1+ threes 62% | |||||
VMI
| Player | Min | Pts | Reb | Ast | 3s |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rickey Bradley Jr.G | 30 | 14.5 | 5.6 | 3.7 | 1.3 |
| 15+ pts 46% · 6+ reb 46% · 4+ ast 49% | |||||
| TJ JohnsonF | 30 | 18.8 | 5.1 | 1.0 | 3.7 |
| 20+ pts 43% · 5+ reb 54% · 4+ threes 47% | |||||
| Trap JohnsonG | 26 | 8.7 | 4.3 | 1.6 | 1.5 |
| 10+ pts 38% · 4+ reb 57% · 2+ ast 45% | |||||
| Alexander DaushviliF | 26 | 9.7 | 7.5 | 1.0 | 0.7 |
| 10+ pts 46% · 8+ reb 46% · 1+ threes 48% | |||||
| Paulius NarvilasF | 24 | 6.8 | 5.1 | 0.8 | 0.3 |
| 5+ pts 63% · 5+ reb 54% · 1+ threes 24% | |||||
| Rokas ZilysG | 18 | 7.2 | 2.4 | 1.7 | 0.7 |
| 5+ pts 67% · 2+ ast 48% · 1+ threes 49% | |||||
| AJ ClarkG | 16 | 6.6 | 2.9 | 1.2 | 0.3 |
| 31% to play · 5+ pts 61% · 3+ reb 50% · 2+ ast 33% | |||||
| Joao PanzoF | 14 | 3.7 | 3.1 | 1.0 | 0.2 |
| 5+ pts 32% · 3+ reb 55% · 2+ ast 27% | |||||
Our own projections from each player's minutes and production, this opponent and the game's pace: not a sportsbook's lines. Under each name, the round numbers the player is about as likely as not to reach. How they have done
Win probability
Game chat
Loading the chat…