Wofford at Charleston So
Wednesday, November 18, 2026, 7:00 PM ET at Buccaneer Fieldhouse. Wofford our rank 235 · 2-2; Charleston So our rank 261 · 1-2.
Who will win Wofford vs Charleston So?
The model gives Charleston Southern a 55% chance to beat Wofford, with a projected score of Charleston So 79, Wofford 78.
Half of games like thisFour in five
Calls of 50–60% have been right 55.4% of the time in 16,654 past games, and the typical miss on the margin is 8.8 points. After the final, the result is pinned to this strip. As of 2:23 AM ET on November 13, 2026. Updated three times a day until tip-off.
Players to watch
| Player | Pts | Reb | Ast | Last games | Chance of |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Charleston So | |||||
| RuffoloG · 27 min | 13.4 | 4.4 | 3.2 | 15+ 39% | |
| McLambG · 28 min | 11.8 | 3.5 | 1.7 | 10+ 61% | |
| CrawfordG · 30 min | 11.0 | 3.7 | 3.4 | 10+ 55% | |
| HubbardG · 29 min | 10.8 | 2.9 | 1.9 | 10+ 54% | |
| Wofford | |||||
| DawkinsG · 25 min | 12.3 | 4.0 | 1.7 | 10+ 64% | |
| WatleyG · 26 min | 9.5 | 3.6 | 1.5 | 10+ 44% | |
| LoweG · 21 min | 9.2 | 3.1 | 2.0 | 10+ 42% | |
| AriasG · 24 min | 8.7 | 4.3 | 1.9 | 10+ 39% | |
Bars: points in the player's latest games this season. Blue line: tonight's projection. Every regular's line
The game without one player
Without Mathok Majok: Wofford 47%Charleston So 53%
The white mark is the call with him: Charleston So 55%.
| Player | Points a game he adds | Charleston So without him | Change | Projected score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Charleston So | ||||
| Mathok Majok | 0.6 | 53% | −2 | 78–79 |
Change is in Charleston So's win chance, in points. Scores read Wofford, then Charleston So. A player's value is what the team is better by with him than with a replacement, from the player ratings.
Model against the line
Your call
All of today's gamesPlay-by-play
Team numbers
Form
Wofford 2-2LLWW
- Nov 11W 91-47vs Voorhees
- Nov 8W 100-67vs Allen
- Nov 6L 70-109at North CarolinaDidn't cover +21.5 · Over 156.5
- Nov 3L 59-90at Tennessee
- Last 4
- 2–2, scoring 80.0 and allowing 78.2
- Against the spread, this season
- 0–1
- Totals, this season
- 1 over, 0 under
Charleston So 1-2LWL
- Nov 10L 64-82at Wake ForestCovered +18.5 · Under 156.5
- Nov 5W 86-49vs Columbia International
- Nov 2L 71-98at South Florida
- Last 3
- 1–2, scoring 73.7 and allowing 76.3
- Against the spread, this season
- 1–0
- Totals, this season
- 0 over, 1 under
The spread and the total are the lines logged with each prediction. Form is what happened; the ratings above already count recent games more.
Offense against defense
| Wofford | Charleston So | |
|---|---|---|
| Points scored per 100 possessions | 104.1 179th | 99.9 273rd |
| Points allowed per 100 | 112.9 310th | 110.7 248th |
| Possessions a game | 71.5 103rd | 72.7 29th |
| Shooting (effective field-goal %) | 48.2% 327th | 51.4% 117th |
| Opponents' shooting | 52.0% 284th | 49.7% 127th |
| Turnovers, share of possessions | 17.3% 96th | 20.5% 352nd |
| Offensive rebounds, share of misses | 32.1% 156th | 31.7% 186th |
| Free throws per shot | 0.27 129th | 0.27 146th |
The widest gap: Wofford's offense (179th) against Charleston So's defense (248th), of 365 teams.
First half
- Projected halftime score
- Wofford 37, Charleston So 37
- First-half margin
- Charleston So by 0.7
- First-half points, both teams
- 73.9
- Projected second half
- Wofford 42, Charleston So 42
- Second-half points, both teams
- 83.6
- Tied at the half
- 4%
- Wofford, first halves so far
- Led 2 of 4 · 40.0 scored, 30.8 allowed
- Charleston So, first halves so far
- Led 1 of 3 · 29.0 scored, 35.0 allowed
Our own projection, not a sportsbook's first-half line. On 11,516 past games it had not seen, the halftime leader was right 67.2% of the time and the first-half total was off by 8.1 points on average. This season: 366 of 476 halftime leaders right. Scorecard
Player projections
Wofford
| Player | Min | Pts | Reb | Ast | 3s |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chace WatleyG | 26 | 9.5 | 3.6 | 1.5 | 0.8 |
| 10+ pts 44% · 4+ reb 46% · 1+ threes 51% | |||||
| Luke FlynnG | 25 | 7.6 | 3.7 | 1.6 | 1.5 |
| 10+ pts 31% · 4+ reb 47% · 2+ ast 46% | |||||
| Jyi DawkinsG | 25 | 12.3 | 4.0 | 1.7 | 1.2 |
| 10+ pts 64% · 4+ reb 53% · 2+ ast 48% | |||||
| Chris AriasG | 24 | 8.7 | 4.3 | 1.9 | 1.8 |
| 10+ pts 39% · 2+ ast 53% · 2+ threes 48% | |||||
| Cam LoweG | 21 | 9.2 | 3.1 | 2.0 | 1.8 |
| 10+ pts 42% · 3+ reb 55% · 2+ threes 49% | |||||
| Jacob DanielsG | 20 | 6.6 | 2.2 | 2.4 | 0.6 |
| 5+ pts 61% · 2+ reb 58% · 3+ ast 42% | |||||
| Jhett CarterG | 18 | 7.7 | 2.6 | 1.2 | 0.8 |
| 10+ pts 31% · 3+ reb 45% · 1+ threes 53% | |||||
| Evan RamseyC | 16 | 5.2 | 4.9 | 0.8 | 0.1 |
| 5+ pts 48% · 5+ reb 51% · 2+ ast 20% | |||||
Charleston So
| Player | Min | Pts | Reb | Ast | 3s |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jackson CrawfordG | 30 | 11.0 | 3.7 | 3.4 | 1.1 |
| 10+ pts 55% · 4+ reb 48% · 4+ ast 43% | |||||
| Jacob TaylorG | 30 | 8.7 | 3.9 | 2.2 | 1.0 |
| 10+ pts 39% · 4+ reb 50% · 1+ threes 60% | |||||
| DJ HubbardG | 29 | 10.8 | 2.9 | 1.9 | 1.4 |
| 10+ pts 54% · 3+ reb 51% · 2+ ast 55% | |||||
| Jefferson McLambG | 28 | 11.8 | 3.5 | 1.7 | 2.3 |
| 10+ pts 61% · 4+ reb 43% · 2+ ast 48% | |||||
| Anthony RuffoloG | 27 | 13.4 | 4.4 | 3.2 | 1.7 |
| 15+ pts 39% · 5+ reb 43% · 2+ threes 48% | |||||
| Lase OlalereF | 23 | 9.7 | 7.0 | 1.5 | 0.0 |
| 10+ pts 46% · 7+ reb 52% · 2+ ast 42% | |||||
| Nicholas ErricaG | 22 | 5.4 | 3.3 | 0.9 | 1.0 |
| 5+ pts 50% · 3+ reb 59% · 1+ threes 59% | |||||
| Mathok MajokF | 17 | 5.4 | 4.7 | 0.7 | 0.1 |
| 5+ pts 50% · 5+ reb 48% · 2+ ast 16% | |||||
Our own projections from each player's minutes and production, this opponent and the game's pace: not a sportsbook's lines. Under each name, the round numbers the player is about as likely as not to reach. How they have done
Win probability
Game chat
Loading the chat…