Who will win Wofford vs Queens?
The model gives Queens University a 71% chance to beat Wofford, with a projected score of Queens 87, Wofford 81.
Half of games like thisFour in five
Calls of 70–80% have been right 74.5% of the time in 14,414 past games, and the typical miss on the margin is 8.8 points. After the final, the result is pinned to this strip. As of 2:23 AM ET on November 13, 2026. Updated three times a day until tip-off.
Players to watch
| Player | Pts | Reb | Ast | Last games | Chance of |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
 Queens | |||||
| MannG · 33 min | 18.7 | 5.1 | 3.5 | 20+ 42% | |
| WatfordG · 30 min | 15.5 | 3.8 | 6.2 | 15+ 52% | |
| ParkerF · 24 min | 13.4 | 5.2 | 1.9 | 15+ 39% | |
| JonesG · 21 min | 11.6 | 2.9 | 2.1 | 10+ 59% | |
 Wofford | |||||
| DawkinsG · 24 min | 12.4 | 4.0 | 1.7 | 10+ 64% | |
| WatleyG · 25 min | 9.6 | 3.6 | 1.5 | 10+ 45% | |
| LoweG · 21 min | 9.3 | 3.1 | 2.0 | 10+ 43% | |
| AriasG · 24 min | 8.8 | 4.3 | 1.9 | 10+ 39% | |
Bars: points in the player's latest games this season. Blue line: tonight's projection. Every regular's line
The game without one player
Without Avantae Parker: Wofford 33%Queens 67%
The white mark is the call with him: Queens 71%.
| Player | Points a game he adds | Queens without him | Change | Projected score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Queens | ||||
| Avantae Parker | 1.3 | 67% | −4 | 81–86 |
| Jordan Watford | 1.2 | 67% | −4 | 81–86 |
| Nasir Mann | 1.2 | 67% | −4 | 81–86 |
Change is in Queens's win chance, in points. Scores read Wofford, then Queens. A player's value is what the team is better by with him than with a replacement, from the player ratings.
Model against the line
Your call
All of today's gamesPlay-by-play
Team numbers
Form
Wofford 2-2LLWW
- Nov 11W 91-47vs Voorhees
- Nov 8W 100-67vs Allen
- Nov 6L 70-109at North CarolinaDidn't cover +21.5 · Over 156.5
- Nov 3L 59-90at Tennessee
- Last 4
- 2–2, scoring 80.0 and allowing 78.2
- Against the spread, this season
- 0–1
- Totals, this season
- 1 over, 0 under
The spread and the total are the lines logged with each prediction. Form is what happened; the ratings above already count recent games more.
Offense against defense
| Wofford | Queens | |
|---|---|---|
| Points scored per 100 possessions | 104.1 179th | 109.2 100th |
| Points allowed per 100 | 112.9 310th | 113.9 321st |
| Possessions a game | 71.5 103rd | 73.1 18th |
| Shooting (effective field-goal %) | 48.2% 327th | 53.0% 41st |
| Opponents' shooting | 52.0% 284th | 56.7% 363rd |
| Turnovers, share of possessions | 17.3% 96th | 16.6% 35th |
| Offensive rebounds, share of misses | 32.1% 156th | 32.8% 116th |
| Free throws per shot | 0.27 129th | 0.25 234th |
The widest gap: Queens's offense (100th) against Wofford's defense (310th), of 365 teams.
First half
- Projected halftime score
- Wofford 38, Queens 41
- First-half margin
- Queens by 3.4
- First-half points, both teams
- 78.7
- Projected second half
- Wofford 43, Queens 46
- Second-half points, both teams
- 89.0
- Tied at the half
- 4%
- Wofford, first halves so far
- Led 2 of 4 · 40.0 scored, 30.8 allowed
- Queens, first halves so far
- Led 1 of 4 · 44.5 scored, 49.2 allowed
Our own projection, not a sportsbook's first-half line. On 11,516 past games it had not seen, the halftime leader was right 67.2% of the time and the first-half total was off by 8.1 points on average. This season: 366 of 476 halftime leaders right. Scorecard
Player projections
Wofford
| Player | Min | Pts | Reb | Ast | 3s |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chace WatleyG | 25 | 9.6 | 3.6 | 1.5 | 0.8 |
| 10+ pts 45% · 4+ reb 47% · 1+ threes 51% | |||||
| Luke FlynnG | 25 | 7.7 | 3.7 | 1.6 | 1.5 |
| 10+ pts 31% · 4+ reb 47% · 2+ ast 45% | |||||
| Jyi DawkinsG | 24 | 12.4 | 4.0 | 1.7 | 1.2 |
| 10+ pts 64% · 4+ reb 53% · 2+ ast 48% | |||||
| Chris AriasG | 24 | 8.8 | 4.3 | 1.9 | 1.8 |
| 10+ pts 39% · 2+ ast 53% · 2+ threes 49% | |||||
| Cam LoweG | 21 | 9.3 | 3.1 | 2.0 | 1.8 |
| 10+ pts 43% · 3+ reb 56% · 2+ threes 50% | |||||
| Jacob DanielsG | 20 | 6.7 | 2.2 | 2.4 | 0.6 |
| 5+ pts 62% · 3+ ast 42% · 1+ threes 43% | |||||
| Jhett CarterG | 18 | 7.8 | 2.6 | 1.2 | 0.9 |
| 10+ pts 32% · 3+ reb 46% · 1+ threes 54% | |||||
| Evan RamseyC | 16 | 5.4 | 5.0 | 0.8 | 0.1 |
| 5+ pts 50% · 5+ reb 53% · 2+ ast 20% | |||||
Queens
| Player | Min | Pts | Reb | Ast | 3s |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nasir MannG | 33 | 18.7 | 5.1 | 3.5 | 2.1 |
| 20+ pts 42% · 5+ reb 55% · 2+ threes 55% | |||||
| Jordan WatfordG | 30 | 15.5 | 3.8 | 6.2 | 0.3 |
| 15+ pts 52% · 4+ reb 50% · 6+ ast 57% | |||||
| Isaiah HenryG | 27 | 11.1 | 5.6 | 1.8 | 1.0 |
| 10+ pts 56% · 6+ reb 47% · 2+ ast 51% | |||||
| Avantae ParkerF | 24 | 13.4 | 5.2 | 1.9 | 0.4 |
| 15+ pts 39% · 5+ reb 56% · 2+ ast 54% | |||||
| Rickey BallardF | 22 | 8.6 | 2.8 | 1.5 | 2.1 |
| 10+ pts 38% · 3+ reb 50% · 2+ threes 57% | |||||
| Caleb JonesG | 21 | 11.6 | 2.9 | 2.1 | 1.3 |
| 10+ pts 59% · 3+ reb 52% · 2+ ast 60% | |||||
| Nicholas McLeanF | 19 | 6.5 | 3.2 | 0.8 | 1.0 |
| 5+ pts 60% · 3+ reb 58% · 1+ threes 59% | |||||
| Dante KearseG | 16 | 5.7 | 3.5 | 1.0 | 0.8 |
| 5+ pts 53% · 4+ reb 43% · 1+ threes 53% | |||||
Our own projections from each player's minutes and production, this opponent and the game's pace: not a sportsbook's lines. Under each name, the round numbers the player is about as likely as not to reach. How they have done
Win probability
Game chat
Loading the chat…