North Carolina Tar Heels
Makes the tournament45%From 20,000 simulated seasons · average seed 7.0
Wins the national title<1%Final Four 1% · projected 20-13
Net rating+15.6Rank 44 of 365 · offence 47, defence 48
Season outlook
- Projected record
- 20-13 (14 to 26 wins)
- Projected conference record
- 10-9
- Wins or shares the conference title
- 1%
- Wins the conference tournament
- 3%
- Average seed if in the field
- 7.0
- A 1 seed
- <1%
- Makes the field45%
- Round of 3228%
- Sweet 169%
- Elite Eight3%
- Final Four1%
- Title game<1%
- Champion<1%
Schedule and results
| Date | Opponent | Where | Win chance | Projected | Result | Pick |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mon 2 Nov | vs Western Carolinarank 240 | Home | 99% | 83-55 | W 80-72 | Right |
| Fri 6 Nov7 PM ET | vs Woffordrank 212 | Home | 97% | 88-66 | — | |
| Tue 10 Nov7 PM ET | vs Wyomingrank 119 | Home | 88% | 83-68 | — |
Rooting guide
- Fri 6 Nov: vs WoffordA win: 45% · a loss: 44%+2 pts
- Tue 10 Nov: vs WyomingA win: 46% · a loss: 41%+4 pts
Early in the season other teams' results barely move a team's chances, so the list is mostly its own games; by February the bubble and conference races make other games matter.
Players
| Player | Games | Minutes | Points | Rebounds | Assists | Rating | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Neo AvdalasG · transfer from Virginia Tech | 1 | 31.0 | 13.0 | 7.0 | 4.0 | +3.6 | +3.1 |
| Jarin StevensonF | 1 | 30.0 | 8.0 | 2.0 | 0.0 | +4.5 | +3.5 |
| Terrence BrownG · transfer from Utah | 1 | 30.0 | 14.0 | 5.0 | 2.0 | +4.6 | +3.6 |
| Matt AbleG · transfer from NC State | 1 | 26.0 | 18.0 | 3.0 | 2.0 | +4.8 | +3.2 |
| Sayon KeitaC | 1 | 20.0 | 4.0 | 2.0 | 0.0 | +0.3 | +0.8 |
| Maximo AdamsF | 1 | 18.0 | 10.0 | 4.0 | 0.0 | +0.4 | +0.8 |
| Jaydon YoungG | 1 | 14.0 | 6.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | +2.7 | +1.2 |
| Alex SamodurovF | 1 | 12.0 | 0.0 | 3.0 | 0.0 | +0.5 | +0.6 |
| Angelo BrizziG · transfer from Buffalo | 1 | 10.0 | 5.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | +2.8 | +0.9 |
| Isaiah DenisG | 1 | 9.0 | 2.0 | 1.0 | 4.0 | +3.4 | +0.9 |
Style and luck
Every teamThe Four Factors adjusted for opponents
| Offence | Defence | League | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ShootingEffective FG% · decides 44% of the margin | 49.5%rank 287 | 49.9%rank 108 | 50.4% |
| TurnoversTurnover rate · decides 25% of the margin | 18.0%rank 69 | 17.2%rank 355 | 18.6% |
| Offensive reboundsRebound rate · decides 21% of the margin | 29.2%rank 359 | 32.8%rank 300 | 31.7% |
| Free throwsFree throws per FG attempt · decides 10% of the margin | 27.9%rank 25 | 27.8%rank 340 | 25.2% |
Defence is what opponents managed. For turnovers a high defence figure is good; for the others, low is good.
Luck so far
- Wins against the pre-game chances
- 1.0 won, 1.0 expected (0.0)
- Opponents' three-point shooting
- −6.7 points a game (they shot 41.7%, league 32.3%)
- Opponents' free throws
- −3.4 points a game
- Close games: by 5 or fewer, or overtime
- None yet
Opponents' three-point shooting repeats little from one half of a season to the other (correlation 0.21), and their free throws even less (0.18), so a team living off either is likely to come back toward average. Positive numbers mean the luck has helped.
Rating this season
- Preseason net rating
- +18.6
- Last season's net rating
- +22.0
- Last season's minutes returning
- 17%
- Transfers in, weighted by minutes
- +3.3
- Change since preseason
- −3.0
- Offence, points per 100 possessions
- 113.7 (rank 47)
- Defence, points allowed per 100
- 98.1 (rank 48)
- Tempo, possessions per 40 minutes
- 71.7 (rank 140)
- Schedule so far, opponents' average
- −8.6 (rank 192)
Atlantic Coast Conference by rating
| # | Team | Record | Conference | Net | Offence | Defence | National rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Duke | 1-0 | 0-0 | +33.5 | 121.9 | 88.4 | 1 |
| 2 | Louisville | 1-0 | 0-0 | +21.8 | 117.0 | 95.2 | 18 |
| 3 | Virginia | 1-0 | 0-0 | +20.2 | 115.0 | 94.8 | 28 |
| 4 | Miami | 0-1 | 0-0 | +20.1 | 116.0 | 95.9 | 31 |
| 5 | North Carolina | 1-0 | 0-0 | +15.6 | 113.7 | 98.1 | 44 |
| 6 | Clemson | 1-0 | 0-0 | +14.6 | 114.4 | 99.7 | 53 |
| 7 | Florida State | 1-0 | 0-0 | +14.3 | 113.9 | 99.6 | 54 |
| 8 | Notre Dame | 1-0 | 0-0 | +13.2 | 111.7 | 98.5 | 58 |
| 9 | NC State | 1-0 | 0-0 | +12.7 | 112.5 | 99.8 | 62 |
| 10 | Syracuse | 1-0 | 0-0 | +11.1 | 111.5 | 100.4 | 67 |
| 11 | SMU | 1-0 | 0-0 | +10.6 | 110.9 | 100.3 | 73 |
| 12 | Stanford | 1-0 | 0-0 | +10.2 | 111.4 | 101.2 | 76 |
| 13 | Virginia Tech | 1-0 | 0-0 | +9.6 | 109.0 | 99.4 | 79 |
| 14 | Pittsburgh | 1-0 | 0-0 | +7.6 | 107.9 | 100.3 | 88 |
| 15 | Georgia Tech | 1-0 | 0-0 | +7.6 | 106.1 | 98.5 | 89 |
| 16 | Wake Forest | 1-0 | 0-0 | +7.5 | 108.6 | 101.2 | 90 |
| 17 | California | 2-0 | 0-0 | +4.5 | 107.1 | 102.6 | 105 |
| 18 | Boston College | 1-0 | 0-0 | +3.9 | 105.4 | 101.5 | 109 |