Louisville Cardinals
Next: vs Morehead St · Sat 7 Nov, 12 PM ETProjected 92-60 · Game page
Makes the tournament79%From 20,000 simulated seasons · average seed 5.5
Wins the national title1%Final Four 5% · projected 22-9
Net rating+21.8Rank 18 of 365 · offence 22, defence 23
Season outlook
- Projected record
- 22-9 (17 to 27 wins)
- Projected conference record
- 13-5
- Wins or shares the conference title
- 14%
- Wins the conference tournament
- 11%
- Average seed if in the field
- 5.5
- A 1 seed
- 2%
- Makes the field79%
- Round of 3261%
- Sweet 1630%
- Elite Eight13%
- Final Four5%
- Title game2%
- Champion1%
Schedule and results
| Date | Opponent | Where | Win chance | Projected | Result | Pick |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mon 2 Nov | vs Chattanoogarank 228 | Home | 99% | 86-55 | W 84-70 | Right |
| Sat 7 Nov12 PM ET | vs Morehead Staterank 302 | Home | 100% | 92-60 | — |
Rooting guide
- No games this week
Early in the season other teams' results barely move a team's chances, so the list is mostly its own games; by February the bubble and conference races make other games matter.
Players
| Player | Games | Minutes | Points | Rebounds | Assists | Rating | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alvaro FolgueirasF · transfer from Iowa | 1 | 34.0 | 10.0 | 4.0 | 3.0 | +5.7 | +4.8 |
| Jackson ShelstadG · transfer from Oregon | 1 | 32.0 | 13.0 | 7.0 | 3.0 | +2.5 | +2.6 |
| Adrian WooleyG | 1 | 28.0 | 15.0 | 3.0 | 3.0 | +4.7 | +3.4 |
| Flory BidungaF · transfer from Kansas | 1 | 27.0 | 16.0 | 9.0 | 1.0 | +8.2 | +5.0 |
| Seth TrimbleG · transfer from North Carolina | 1 | 26.0 | 13.0 | 3.0 | 5.0 | +5.0 | +3.3 |
| Karter KnoxG · transfer from Arkansas | 1 | 21.0 | 9.0 | 11.0 | 1.0 | +4.0 | +2.3 |
| Isaac EllisG | 1 | 14.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | −0.2 | +0.5 |
| LJ WellsF · transfer from N Kentucky | 1 | 9.0 | 2.0 | 3.0 | 0.0 | +3.6 | +0.9 |
| Obinna Ekezie Jr.C | 1 | 9.0 | 5.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | +0.3 |
Style and luck
Every teamThe Four Factors adjusted for opponents
| Offence | Defence | League | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ShootingEffective FG% · decides 44% of the margin | 49.5%rank 287 | 51.9%rank 320 | 50.4% |
| TurnoversTurnover rate · decides 25% of the margin | 18.2%rank 109 | 19.2%rank 57 | 18.6% |
| Offensive reboundsRebound rate · decides 21% of the margin | 32.6%rank 75 | 32.2%rank 267 | 31.7% |
| Free throwsFree throws per FG attempt · decides 10% of the margin | 24.0%rank 289 | 23.9%rank 72 | 25.2% |
Defence is what opponents managed. For turnovers a high defence figure is good; for the others, low is good.
Luck so far
- Wins against the pre-game chances
- 1.0 won, 1.0 expected (0.0)
- Opponents' three-point shooting
- −4.0 points a game (they shot 36.4%, league 32.3%)
- Opponents' free throws
- +1.6 points a game
- Close games: by 5 or fewer, or overtime
- None yet
Opponents' three-point shooting repeats little from one half of a season to the other (correlation 0.21), and their free throws even less (0.18), so a team living off either is likely to come back toward average. Positive numbers mean the luck has helped.
Rating this season
- Preseason net rating
- +23.7
- Last season's net rating
- +26.2
- Last season's minutes returning
- 11%
- Transfers in, weighted by minutes
- +13.2
- Change since preseason
- −1.9
- Offence, points per 100 possessions
- 117.0 (rank 22)
- Defence, points allowed per 100
- 95.2 (rank 23)
- Tempo, possessions per 40 minutes
- 72.4 (rank 62)
- Schedule so far, opponents' average
- −7.8 (rank 187)
Atlantic Coast Conference by rating
| # | Team | Record | Conference | Net | Offence | Defence | National rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Duke | 1-0 | 0-0 | +33.5 | 121.9 | 88.4 | 1 |
| 2 | Louisville | 1-0 | 0-0 | +21.8 | 117.0 | 95.2 | 18 |
| 3 | Virginia | 1-0 | 0-0 | +20.2 | 115.0 | 94.8 | 28 |
| 4 | Miami | 0-1 | 0-0 | +20.1 | 116.0 | 95.9 | 31 |
| 5 | North Carolina | 1-0 | 0-0 | +15.6 | 113.7 | 98.1 | 44 |
| 6 | Clemson | 1-0 | 0-0 | +14.6 | 114.4 | 99.7 | 53 |
| 7 | Florida State | 1-0 | 0-0 | +14.3 | 113.9 | 99.6 | 54 |
| 8 | Notre Dame | 1-0 | 0-0 | +13.2 | 111.7 | 98.5 | 58 |
| 9 | NC State | 1-0 | 0-0 | +12.7 | 112.5 | 99.8 | 62 |
| 10 | Syracuse | 1-0 | 0-0 | +11.1 | 111.5 | 100.4 | 67 |
| 11 | SMU | 1-0 | 0-0 | +10.6 | 110.9 | 100.3 | 73 |
| 12 | Stanford | 1-0 | 0-0 | +10.2 | 111.4 | 101.2 | 76 |
| 13 | Virginia Tech | 1-0 | 0-0 | +9.6 | 109.0 | 99.4 | 79 |
| 14 | Pittsburgh | 1-0 | 0-0 | +7.6 | 107.9 | 100.3 | 88 |
| 15 | Georgia Tech | 1-0 | 0-0 | +7.6 | 106.1 | 98.5 | 89 |
| 16 | Wake Forest | 1-0 | 0-0 | +7.5 | 108.6 | 101.2 | 90 |
| 17 | California | 2-0 | 0-0 | +4.5 | 107.1 | 102.6 | 105 |
| 18 | Boston College | 1-0 | 0-0 | +3.9 | 105.4 | 101.5 | 109 |