Virginia Cavaliers
Next: vs Northeastern · Fri 6 Nov, 5 PM ETProjected 92-64 · Game page
Makes the tournament73%From 20,000 simulated seasons · average seed 6.0
Wins the national title<1%Final Four 3% · projected 23-10
Net rating+20.2Rank 28 of 365 · offence 30, defence 21
Season outlook
- Projected record
- 23-10 (18 to 28 wins)
- Projected conference record
- 12-6
- Wins or shares the conference title
- 6%
- Wins the conference tournament
- 8%
- Average seed if in the field
- 6.0
- A 1 seed
- 1%
- Makes the field73%
- Round of 3253%
- Sweet 1624%
- Elite Eight9%
- Final Four3%
- Title game1%
- Champion<1%
Schedule and results
| Date | Opponent | Where | Win chance | Projected | Result | Pick |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tue 3 Nov | vs Drexelrank 224 | Home | 97% | 84-60 | W 89-60 | Right |
| Fri 6 Nov5 PM ET | vs Northeasternrank 241 | Home | 99% | 92-64 | — | |
| Sun 8 Nov1 PM ET | vs Arkansasrank 26 | Neutral | 48% | 78-78 | — | |
| Tue 10 Nov9 PM ET | vs Bucknellrank 331 | Home | 100% | 91-58 | — |
Rooting guide
- Fri 6 Nov: vs NortheasternA win: 73% · a loss: 70%+3 pts
- Sun 8 Nov: vs ArkansasA win: 77% · a loss: 69%+8 pts
Early in the season other teams' results barely move a team's chances, so the list is mostly its own games; by February the bubble and conference races make other games matter.
Players
| Player | Games | Minutes | Points | Rebounds | Assists | Rating | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Johann GrunlohC | 1 | 29.0 | 11.0 | 9.0 | 1.0 | +6.5 | +4.4 |
| Sam LewisG | 1 | 27.0 | 20.0 | 4.0 | 3.0 | +5.0 | +3.4 |
| Thijs De RidderF | 1 | 27.0 | 24.0 | 9.0 | 1.0 | +7.2 | +4.5 |
| Chance MalloryG | 1 | 22.0 | 8.0 | 3.0 | 3.0 | +6.7 | +3.4 |
| Nolan AdekunleF | 1 | 20.0 | 5.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | +0.7 |
| Elijah GertrudeG | 1 | 15.0 | 8.0 | 4.0 | 2.0 | +3.0 | +1.3 |
| Kalu AnyaF | 1 | 15.0 | 2.0 | 1.0 | 3.0 | +0.1 | +0.6 |
| Jurian DixonG · transfer from UC Irvine | 1 | 12.0 | 7.0 | 2.0 | 1.0 | +3.3 | +1.1 |
| Martin CarrereG | 1 | 9.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | +2.6 | +0.7 |
| Jan VideG · transfer from LMU | 1 | 7.0 | 2.0 | 2.0 | 1.0 | +2.0 | +0.5 |
| Christian HarmonG · transfer from Arkansas St | 1 | 7.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | +2.5 | +0.6 |
| Favour IbeC | 1 | 6.0 | 1.0 | 2.0 | 0.0 | +0.3 | +0.3 |
| Silas BarksdaleF | 1 | 4.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | +0.4 | +0.2 |
Style and luck
Every teamThe Four Factors adjusted for opponents
| Offence | Defence | League | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ShootingEffective FG% · decides 44% of the margin | 50.4%rank 212 | 50.6%rank 246 | 50.4% |
| TurnoversTurnover rate · decides 25% of the margin | 18.9%rank 276 | 19.7%rank 26 | 18.5% |
| Offensive reboundsRebound rate · decides 21% of the margin | 31.4%rank 240 | 30.3%rank 44 | 31.8% |
| Free throwsFree throws per FG attempt · decides 10% of the margin | 24.2%rank 285 | 23.4%rank 45 | 25.3% |
Defence is what opponents managed. For turnovers a high defence figure is good; for the others, low is good.
Luck so far
- Wins against the pre-game chances
- 1.0 won, 1.0 expected (0.0)
- Opponents' three-point shooting
- +0.2 points a game (they shot 32.0%, league 32.3%)
- Opponents' free throws
- −1.2 points a game
- Close games: by 5 or fewer, or overtime
- None yet
Opponents' three-point shooting repeats little from one half of a season to the other (correlation 0.21), and their free throws even less (0.18), so a team living off either is likely to come back toward average. Positive numbers mean the luck has helped.
Rating this season
- Preseason net rating
- +19.2
- Last season's net rating
- +25.9
- Last season's minutes returning
- 51%
- Transfers in, weighted by minutes
- +1.0
- Change since preseason
- +1.0
- Offence, points per 100 possessions
- 115.1 (rank 30)
- Defence, points allowed per 100
- 94.9 (rank 21)
- Tempo, possessions per 40 minutes
- 71.1 (rank 210)
- Schedule so far, opponents' average
- −7.4 (rank 188)
Atlantic Coast Conference by rating
| # | Team | Record | Conference | Net | Offence | Defence | National rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Duke | 1-0 | 0-0 | +33.5 | 122.0 | 88.5 | 1 |
| 2 | Louisville | 1-0 | 0-0 | +22.2 | 116.7 | 94.5 | 17 |
| 3 | Virginia | 1-0 | 0-0 | +20.2 | 115.1 | 94.9 | 28 |
| 4 | Miami | 0-1 | 0-0 | +20.1 | 116.1 | 96.0 | 31 |
| 5 | North Carolina | 1-0 | 0-0 | +15.6 | 113.8 | 98.2 | 44 |
| 6 | Clemson | 1-0 | 0-0 | +14.6 | 114.5 | 99.8 | 53 |
| 7 | Florida State | 1-0 | 0-0 | +14.3 | 114.0 | 99.7 | 54 |
| 8 | Notre Dame | 1-0 | 0-0 | +13.2 | 111.8 | 98.5 | 58 |
| 9 | NC State | 1-0 | 0-0 | +12.7 | 112.6 | 99.9 | 62 |
| 10 | Syracuse | 1-0 | 0-0 | +11.1 | 111.5 | 100.5 | 67 |
| 11 | SMU | 1-0 | 0-0 | +10.6 | 111.0 | 100.3 | 72 |
| 12 | Stanford | 1-0 | 0-0 | +10.2 | 111.5 | 101.3 | 75 |
| 13 | Virginia Tech | 1-0 | 0-0 | +9.6 | 109.1 | 99.5 | 77 |
| 14 | Pittsburgh | 1-0 | 0-0 | +7.6 | 108.0 | 100.4 | 86 |
| 15 | Georgia Tech | 1-0 | 0-0 | +7.6 | 106.2 | 98.6 | 87 |
| 16 | Wake Forest | 1-1 | 0-0 | +6.8 | 107.1 | 100.3 | 94 |
| 17 | California | 2-0 | 0-0 | +4.5 | 107.2 | 102.7 | 106 |
| 18 | Boston College | 1-0 | 0-0 | +3.9 | 105.5 | 101.6 | 110 |