California Golden Bears
Makes the tournament2%From 20,000 simulated seasons · average seed 9.4
Wins the national title0%Final Four 0% · projected 14-18
Net rating+4.5Rank 107 of 365 · offence 102, defence 106
Season outlook
- Projected record
- 14-18 (10 to 19 wins)
- Projected conference record
- 5-13
- Wins or shares the conference title
- 0%
- Wins the conference tournament
- <1%
- Average seed if in the field
- 9.4
- A 1 seed
- 0%
- Makes the field2%
- Round of 321%
- Sweet 16<1%
- Elite Eight<1%
- Final Four0%
- Title game0%
- Champion0%
Schedule and results
Rooting guide
Early in the season other teams' results barely move a team's chances, so the list is mostly its own games; by February the bubble and conference races make other games matter.
Players
| Player | Games | Minutes | Points | Rebounds | Assists | Rating | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nojus IndrusaitisG · transfer from Pitt | 2 | 29.5 | 25.0 | 3.0 | 2.5 | +1.2 | +1.7 |
| Jordan RossG · transfer from Georgia | 2 | 28.0 | 10.0 | 2.0 | 8.0 | +1.5 | +1.8 |
| Sammie YeanayF | 2 | 23.0 | 12.0 | 6.0 | 3.0 | −0.2 | +0.8 |
| Michael CooperG · transfer from Wright St | 2 | 23.0 | 20.0 | 2.5 | 2.5 | +0.9 | +1.2 |
| Jake WilkinsF · transfer from Georgia | 2 | 22.5 | 12.5 | 6.5 | 2.0 | +3.4 | +2.2 |
| Semetri CarrG | 2 | 19.0 | 5.0 | 4.5 | 5.5 | +1.2 | +1.1 |
| Mantas KocanasC | 2 | 18.0 | 4.5 | 4.0 | 0.5 | −0.3 | +0.6 |
| Jovani RuffG | 2 | 15.0 | 6.5 | 2.0 | 0.0 | −1.0 | +0.3 |
| Dhiaukuei Manyiel DutF | 2 | 9.5 | 1.0 | 1.5 | 0.0 | +0.6 | +0.5 |
| Amier AliF · transfer from Mississippi St | 1 | 10.0 | 2.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | +0.8 | +0.5 |
| Gabriel SularskiG | 1 | 5.0 | 2.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | −0.4 | +0.1 |
| Jorell ClarkG | 1 | 3.0 | 2.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | −0.3 | +0.1 |
| BJ FisherG | 1 | 2.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | +0.6 | +0.1 |
| Luke ButlerG | 1 | 2.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | +1.1 | +0.1 |
Style and luck
Every teamThe Four Factors adjusted for opponents
| Offence | Defence | League | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ShootingEffective FG% · decides 44% of the margin | 51.8%rank 42 | 50.2%rank 229 | 50.1% |
| TurnoversTurnover rate · decides 25% of the margin | 19.1%rank 301 | 17.8%rank 308 | 18.5% |
| Offensive reboundsRebound rate · decides 21% of the margin | 29.4%rank 349 | 32.4%rank 275 | 31.7% |
| Free throwsFree throws per FG attempt · decides 10% of the margin | 23.1%rank 337 | 24.0%rank 66 | 25.6% |
Defence is what opponents managed. For turnovers a high defence figure is good; for the others, low is good.
Luck so far
- Wins against the pre-game chances
- 1.0 won, 0.9 expected (+0.1)
- Opponents' three-point shooting
- +6.7 points a game (they shot 24.1%, league 31.9%)
- Opponents' free throws
- +1.4 points a game
- Close games: by 5 or fewer, or overtime
- None yet
Opponents' three-point shooting repeats little from one half of a season to the other (correlation 0.21), and their free throws even less (0.18), so a team living off either is likely to come back toward average. Positive numbers mean the luck has helped.
Rating this season
- Preseason net rating
- +8.2
- Last season's net rating
- +12.0
- Last season's minutes returning
- 21%
- Transfers in, weighted by minutes
- +4.2
- Change since preseason
- −3.7
- Offence, points per 100 possessions
- 107.0 (rank 102)
- Defence, points allowed per 100
- 102.4 (rank 106)
- Tempo, possessions per 40 minutes
- 71.7 (rank 110)
- Schedule so far, opponents' average
- −7.5 (rank 188)
Atlantic Coast Conference by rating
| # | Team | Record | Conference | Net | Offence | Defence | National rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Duke | 1-0 | 0-0 | +33.6 | 121.8 | 88.2 | 1 |
| 2 | Louisville | 1-0 | 0-0 | +22.3 | 116.5 | 94.2 | 17 |
| 3 | Virginia | 1-0 | 0-0 | +20.3 | 114.9 | 94.6 | 29 |
| 4 | Miami | 0-1 | 0-0 | +20.1 | 115.9 | 95.8 | 31 |
| 5 | North Carolina | 1-0 | 0-0 | +15.7 | 113.6 | 98.0 | 43 |
| 6 | Syracuse | 2-0 | 0-0 | +15.5 | 115.0 | 99.5 | 44 |
| 7 | Clemson | 1-0 | 0-0 | +14.7 | 114.3 | 99.6 | 53 |
| 8 | Florida State | 1-0 | 0-0 | +14.3 | 113.8 | 99.5 | 56 |
| 9 | NC State | 1-0 | 0-0 | +12.8 | 112.4 | 99.7 | 62 |
| 10 | Notre Dame | 2-0 | 0-0 | +12.7 | 111.4 | 98.7 | 63 |
| 11 | Virginia Tech | 2-0 | 0-0 | +12.0 | 111.1 | 99.1 | 68 |
| 12 | SMU | 1-0 | 0-0 | +10.7 | 110.8 | 100.1 | 74 |
| 13 | Stanford | 1-0 | 0-0 | +10.2 | 111.3 | 101.1 | 76 |
| 14 | Pittsburgh | 2-0 | 0-0 | +8.3 | 108.0 | 99.7 | 86 |
| 15 | Georgia Tech | 1-0 | 0-0 | +7.7 | 106.0 | 98.4 | 88 |
| 16 | Wake Forest | 1-1 | 0-0 | +6.8 | 106.9 | 100.1 | 93 |
| 17 | California | 2-0 | 0-0 | +4.5 | 107.0 | 102.4 | 107 |
| 18 | Boston College | 1-0 | 0-0 | +4.0 | 105.3 | 101.3 | 110 |