Who will win Wyoming vs Duquesne?
The model gives Wyoming a 65% chance to beat Duquesne, with a projected score of Wyoming 76, Duquesne 71.
Half of games like thisFour in five
Calls of 60–70% have been right 64.8% of the time in 15,721 past games, and the typical miss on the margin is 8.8 points. After the final, the result is pinned to this strip. As of 2:23 AM ET on November 13, 2026. Updated three times a day until tip-off.
Players to watch
| Player | Pts | Reb | Ast | Last games | Chance of |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MeyerG · 28 min | 14.4 | 5.1 | 2.7 | 15+ 45% | |
| BennettG · 28 min | 10.2 | 5.4 | 2.6 | 10+ 49% | |
| SondorsF · 18 min | 9.1 | 3.1 | 0.6 | 10+ 41% | |
| GoresF · 19 min | 8.7 | 3.9 | 0.6 | 10+ 39% | |
| BermanF · 33 min | 12.7 | 4.5 | 2.7 | 15+ 35% | |
| KonanF · 31 min | 10.2 | 6.1 | 2.3 | 10+ 50% | |
| SmithG · 18 min | 9.3 | 1.4 | 1.0 | 10+ 43% | |
| LawsonG · 27 min | 8.4 | 3.8 | 1.3 | 10+ 37% | |
Bars: points in the player's latest games this season. Blue line: tonight's projection. Every regular's line
The game without one player
Without Nasir Meyer: Wyoming 57%Duquesne 43%
The white mark is the call with him: Wyoming 65%.
| Player | Points a game he adds | Wyoming without him | Change | Projected score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nasir Meyer | 2.6 | 57% | −8 | 74–72 |
| Khaden Bennett | 2.4 | 57% | −8 | 74–72 |
| Uriyah Rojas | 1.7 | 60% | −5 | 75–72 |
| Gavin Gores | 1.5 | 60% | −5 | 75–72 |
| Kerem Konan | 1.8 | 71% | +6 | 76–70 |
| Yoav Berman | 1.5 | 70% | +5 | 76–70 |
| Ege Demir | 1.1 | 69% | +4 | 76–71 |
| Izaiah Pasha | 1.1 | 69% | +4 | 76–71 |
Change is in Wyoming's win chance, in points. Scores read Wyoming, then Duquesne. A player's value is what the team is better by with him than with a replacement, from the player ratings.
Model against the line
Your call
All of today's gamesPlay-by-play
Team numbers
Form
Wyoming 2-1WWL
- Nov 10L 63-76at North CarolinaDidn't cover +12.5 · Under 155.5
- Nov 6W 93-62vs Idaho StCovered −18.5 · Over 146.5
- Nov 3W 95-48vs Regis University
- Last 3
- 2–1, scoring 83.7 and allowing 62.0
- Against the spread, this season
- 1–1
- Totals, this season
- 1 over, 1 under
Duquesne 3-0WWW
- Nov 10W 72-71vs Washington StDidn't cover −3.5 · Under 145.5
- Nov 7W 68-58vs Central State
- Nov 3W 78-71vs Purdue FW
- Last 3
- 3–0, scoring 72.7 and allowing 66.7
- Against the spread, this season
- 0–1
- Totals, this season
- 0 over, 1 under
The spread and the total are the lines logged with each prediction. Form is what happened; the ratings above already count recent games more.
Offense against defense
| Wyoming | Duquesne | |
|---|---|---|
| Points scored per 100 possessions | 110.4 88th | 105.8 145th |
| Points allowed per 100 | 103.0 96th | 104.3 106th |
| Possessions a game | 70.0 266th | 70.4 222nd |
| Shooting (effective field-goal %) | 50.5% 185th | 50.2% 206th |
| Opponents' shooting | 49.8% 132nd | 52.6% 313th |
| Turnovers, share of possessions | 18.5% 229th | 19.4% 314th |
| Offensive rebounds, share of misses | 37.2% 2nd | 32.6% 128th |
| Free throws per shot | 0.22 340th | 0.28 97th |
The widest gap: Wyoming's defense (96th) against Duquesne's offense (145th), of 365 teams.
First half
- Projected halftime score
- Wyoming 36, Duquesne 33
- First-half margin
- Wyoming by 2.4
- First-half points, both teams
- 68.8
- Projected second half
- Wyoming 40, Duquesne 38
- Second-half points, both teams
- 77.9
- Tied at the half
- 4%
- Wyoming, first halves so far
- Led 2 of 3 · 38.3 scored, 26.0 allowed
- Duquesne, first halves so far
- Led 1 of 3 · 32.3 scored, 35.3 allowed
Our own projection, not a sportsbook's first-half line. On 11,516 past games it had not seen, the halftime leader was right 67.2% of the time and the first-half total was off by 8.1 points on average. This season: 366 of 476 halftime leaders right. Scorecard
Player projections
Wyoming
| Player | Min | Pts | Reb | Ast | 3s |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Khaden BennettG | 28 | 10.2 | 5.4 | 2.6 | 1.2 |
| 10+ pts 49% · 6+ reb 44% · 3+ ast 46% | |||||
| Nasir MeyerG | 28 | 14.4 | 5.1 | 2.7 | 1.4 |
| 15+ pts 45% · 5+ reb 55% · 3+ ast 49% | |||||
| Mike MoraF | 22 | 7.2 | 4.5 | 1.6 | 0.9 |
| 5+ pts 66% · 5+ reb 46% · 2+ ast 46% | |||||
| Uriyah RojasG | 21 | 6.1 | 3.1 | 2.0 | 1.1 |
| 5+ pts 57% · 3+ reb 55% · 2+ ast 55% | |||||
| Parker GerritsG | 20 | 5.1 | 2.5 | 1.8 | 0.8 |
| 5+ pts 47% · 2+ ast 51% · 1+ threes 50% | |||||
| Gavin GoresF | 19 | 8.7 | 3.9 | 0.6 | 0.3 |
| 10+ pts 39% · 4+ reb 50% · 1+ threes 22% | |||||
| Renars SondorsF | 18 | 9.1 | 3.1 | 0.6 | 1.8 |
| 10+ pts 41% · 3+ reb 55% · 2+ threes 48% | |||||
| Canin JeffersonG | 15 | 5.8 | 1.1 | 1.9 | 0.5 |
| 5+ pts 54% · 2+ ast 54% · 1+ threes 38% | |||||
Duquesne
| Player | Min | Pts | Reb | Ast | 3s |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yoav BermanF | 33 | 12.7 | 4.5 | 2.7 | 1.3 |
| 15+ pts 35% · 5+ reb 45% · 3+ ast 48% | |||||
| Kerem KonanF | 31 | 10.2 | 6.1 | 2.3 | 0.5 |
| 10+ pts 50% · 6+ reb 54% · 3+ ast 39% | |||||
| Arness LawsonG | 27 | 8.4 | 3.8 | 1.3 | 0.5 |
| 10+ pts 37% · 4+ reb 50% · 1+ threes 40% | |||||
| Izaiah PashaG | 23 | 4.6 | 2.1 | 1.5 | 0.6 |
| 5+ pts 41% · 2+ reb 57% · 1+ threes 44% | |||||
| Ege DemirC | 20 | 5.0 | 5.1 | 0.7 | 0.0 |
| 5+ pts 46% · 5+ reb 54% · 2+ ast 15% | |||||
| Josh SmithG | 18 | 9.3 | 1.4 | 1.0 | 1.2 |
| 10+ pts 43% · 2+ reb 37% · 1+ threes 64% | |||||
| Jake DiMicheleG | 17 | 4.7 | 1.2 | 1.0 | 0.6 |
| 5+ pts 42% · 2+ reb 32% · 1+ threes 44% | |||||
| Stephen OlowoniyiF | 14 | 4.7 | 2.3 | 0.3 | 0.1 |
| 5+ pts 42% · 2+ reb 61% | |||||
Our own projections from each player's minutes and production, this opponent and the game's pace: not a sportsbook's lines. Under each name, the round numbers the player is about as likely as not to reach. How they have done
Win probability
Game chat
Loading the chat…