Sacred Heart at Rutgers
Tuesday, November 24, 2026, 6:00 PM ET at Jersey Mike’s Arena. Sacred Heart our rank 303 · 2-2; Rutgers our rank 66 · 2-0.
Who will win Sacred Heart vs Rutgers?
The model gives Rutgers a 98% chance to beat Sacred Heart, with a projected score of Rutgers 89, Sacred Heart 65.
Half of games like thisFour in five
Calls of 90–100% have been right 95.4% of the time in 11,767 past games, and the typical miss on the margin is 8.8 points. After the final, the result is pinned to this strip. As of 2:23 AM ET on November 13, 2026. Updated three times a day until tip-off.
Players to watch
| Player | Pts | Reb | Ast | Last games | Chance of |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rutgers | |||||
| FrancisG · 25 min | 16.8 | 2.0 | 3.8 | 15+ 60% | |
| Smith Jr.G · 20 min | 12.7 | 4.2 | 0.9 | 15+ 35% | |
| MarkG · 20 min | 9.9 | 3.7 | 2.3 | 10+ 48% | |
| GurdakC · 19 min | 9.5 | 5.1 | 0.9 | 10+ 45% | |
| Sacred Heart | |||||
| RobinsonF · 29 min | 11.0 | 4.6 | 1.3 | 10+ 55% | |
| BarroukG · 28 min | 9.6 | 4.4 | 0.8 | 10+ 45% | |
| WallaceG · 23 min | 9.5 | 2.5 | 0.7 | 10+ 44% | |
| SlaughterG · 28 min | 8.2 | 4.2 | 2.2 | 10+ 35% | |
Bars: points in the player's latest games this season. Blue line: tonight's projection. Every regular's line
The game without one player
Without Tariq Francis: Sacred Heart 3%Rutgers 97%
The white mark is the call with him: Rutgers 98%.
| Player | Points a game he adds | Rutgers without him | Change | Projected score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rutgers | ||||
| Tariq Francis | 2.9 | 97% | −1 | 66–87 |
| Christian Gurdak | 2.0 | 97% | −1 | 66–88 |
| Darren Buchanan Jr. | 1.7 | 97% | −1 | 66–88 |
| Jamichael Davis | 1.7 | 97% | −1 | 66–88 |
Change is in Rutgers's win chance, in points. Scores read Sacred Heart, then Rutgers. A player's value is what the team is better by with him than with a replacement, from the player ratings.
Model against the line
Your call
All of today's gamesPlay-by-play
Team numbers
Form
Sacred Heart 2-2WLWL
- Nov 12L 75-79vs C ConnecticutDidn't cover −6.5 · Over 144.5
- Nov 8W 81-76at New HampshireCovered +1.5 · Over 145.5
- Nov 5L 72-74vs MaineDidn't cover −5.5 · Over 142.5
- Nov 2W 111-44vs Coast Guard
- Last 4
- 2–2, scoring 84.8 and allowing 68.2
- Against the spread, this season
- 1–2
- Totals, this season
- 3 over, 0 under
The spread and the total are the lines logged with each prediction. Form is what happened; the ratings above already count recent games more.
Offense against defense
| Sacred Heart | Rutgers | |
|---|---|---|
| Points scored per 100 possessions | 99.2 288th | 114.1 60th |
| Points allowed per 100 | 112.9 308th | 101.7 78th |
| Possessions a game | 71.1 143rd | 71.0 157th |
| Shooting (effective field-goal %) | 48.9% 295th | 52.1% 79th |
| Opponents' shooting | 52.1% 291st | 49.5% 108th |
| Turnovers, share of possessions | 16.6% 36th | 17.4% 109th |
| Offensive rebounds, share of misses | 30.8% 247th | 31.3% 211th |
| Free throws per shot | 0.25 222nd | 0.29 49th |
The widest gap: Rutgers's offense (60th) against Sacred Heart's defense (308th), of 365 teams.
First half
- Projected halftime score
- Sacred Heart 29, Rutgers 43
- First-half margin
- Rutgers by 13.1
- First-half points, both teams
- 72.0
- Projected second half
- Sacred Heart 35, Rutgers 46
- Second-half points, both teams
- 81.4
- Tied at the half
- 4%
- Sacred Heart, first halves so far
- Led 3 of 4 · 40.2 scored, 26.2 allowed
- Rutgers, first halves so far
- Led 2 of 2 · 42.5 scored, 24.5 allowed
Our own projection, not a sportsbook's first-half line. On 11,516 past games it had not seen, the halftime leader was right 67.2% of the time and the first-half total was off by 8.1 points on average. This season: 366 of 476 halftime leaders right. Scorecard
Player projections
Sacred Heart
| Player | Min | Pts | Reb | Ast | 3s |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jaylen RobinsonF | 29 | 11.0 | 4.6 | 1.3 | 0.1 |
| 10+ pts 55% · 5+ reb 46% · 2+ ast 36% | |||||
| Jaden SlaughterG | 28 | 8.2 | 4.2 | 2.2 | 0.3 |
| 10+ pts 35% · 4+ reb 57% · 2+ ast 61% | |||||
| Kedrick CurtisF | 28 | 8.1 | 6.0 | 1.4 | 0.5 |
| 10+ pts 34% · 6+ reb 52% · 1+ threes 39% | |||||
| Griffin BarroukG | 28 | 9.6 | 4.4 | 0.8 | 2.5 |
| 10+ pts 45% · 5+ reb 43% · 3+ threes 43% | |||||
| Jojo WallaceG | 23 | 9.5 | 2.5 | 0.7 | 1.2 |
| 10+ pts 44% · 3+ reb 43% · 1+ threes 64% | |||||
| Jo Van BuggenhoutG | 19 | 3.4 | 2.2 | 2.3 | 0.6 |
| 5+ pts 29% · 2+ reb 59% · 1+ threes 43% | |||||
| Samson ReillyG | 18 | 7.1 | 1.3 | 0.6 | 1.3 |
| 5+ pts 66% · 2+ reb 34% · 2+ threes 35% | |||||
| Abdou YaddF | 13 | 4.5 | 2.3 | 0.3 | 0.6 |
| 5+ pts 40% · 2+ reb 61% · 1+ threes 45% | |||||
Rutgers
| Player | Min | Pts | Reb | Ast | 3s |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tariq FrancisG | 25 | 16.8 | 2.0 | 3.8 | 1.7 |
| 15+ pts 60% · 2+ reb 53% · 4+ ast 50% | |||||
| Darren Buchanan Jr.G | 23 | 8.8 | 4.2 | 2.6 | 0.3 |
| 10+ pts 39% · 4+ reb 56% · 3+ ast 47% | |||||
| Lino MarkG | 20 | 9.9 | 3.7 | 2.3 | 0.8 |
| 10+ pts 48% · 4+ reb 48% · 1+ threes 50% | |||||
| Jamichael DavisG | 20 | 8.7 | 2.7 | 2.1 | 0.7 |
| 10+ pts 38% · 3+ reb 47% · 1+ threes 50% | |||||
| Darin Smith Jr.G | 20 | 12.7 | 4.2 | 0.9 | 1.5 |
| 15+ pts 35% · 4+ reb 56% · 2+ threes 42% | |||||
| Christian GurdakC | 19 | 9.5 | 5.1 | 0.9 | 0.0 |
| 10+ pts 45% · 5+ reb 54% · 2+ ast 22% | |||||
| Rasheed JonesG | 18 | 9.5 | 2.3 | 1.6 | 1.4 |
| 10+ pts 45% · 2+ reb 61% · 2+ ast 44% | |||||
| Diego GaravagliaG | 13 | 3.8 | 2.2 | 1.1 | 0.6 |
| 5+ pts 34% · 2+ reb 58% · 1+ threes 42% | |||||
Our own projections from each player's minutes and production, this opponent and the game's pace: not a sportsbook's lines. Under each name, the round numbers the player is about as likely as not to reach. How they have done
Win probability
Game chat
Loading the chat…