Queens at Gardner-Webb
Women's · Saturday, November 14, 2026, 2:00 PM ET at Paul Porter Arena. Queens our rank 320 · 1-2; Gardner-Webb our rank 331 · 1-1.
Who will win Queens vs Gardner-Webb?
The model gives Gardner-Webb a 56% chance to beat Queens University, with a projected score of Gardner-Webb 62, Queens 60.
Half of games like thisFour in five
Calls of 50–60% have been right 55.7% of the time in 7,540 past games, and the typical miss on the margin is 9.5 points. After the final, the result is pinned to this strip. As of 2:23 AM ET on November 13, 2026. Updated three times a day until tip-off.
Players to watch
| Player | Pts | Reb | Ast | Last games | Chance of |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TullG · 29 min | 10.0 | 3.4 | 1.6 | 10+ 48% | |
| OfunniyinF · 25 min | 9.0 | 6.2 | 0.8 | 10+ 41% | |
| ThompsonG · 21 min | 6.8 | 2.2 | 1.0 | 5+ 63% | |
| HarrisG · 18 min | 6.0 | 2.0 | 0.9 | 5+ 56% | |
| MinshallG · 25 min | 8.5 | 3.5 | 1.5 | 10+ 37% | |
| NobleG · 26 min | 7.7 | 4.1 | 1.0 | 10+ 32% | |
| KlabundeG · 22 min | 7.5 | 2.4 | 1.8 | 5+ 69% | |
| DavisF · 22 min | 7.1 | 4.3 | 0.8 | 5+ 66% | |
Bars: points in the player's latest games this season. Blue line: tonight's projection. Every regular's line
Model against the line
Your call
All of today's gamesPlay-by-play
Team numbers
Form
Queens 1-2LLW
- Nov 9W 86-40vs Carolina University
- Nov 4L 42-100at Vanderbilt
- Nov 2L 56-92at Alabama
- Last 3
- 1–2, scoring 61.3 and allowing 77.3
Gardner-Webb 1-1WL
- Nov 11L 54-59vs UNC Greensboro
- Nov 5W 84-72at Catawba
- Last 2
- 1–1, scoring 69.0 and allowing 65.5
The spread and the total are the lines logged with each prediction. Form is what happened; the ratings above already count recent games more.
Offense against defense
| Queens | Gardner-Webb | |
|---|---|---|
| Points scored per 100 possessions | 76.9 344th | 79.2 321st |
| Points allowed per 100 | 96.4 226th | 100.9 311th |
| Possessions a game | 73.7 57th | 70.7 307th |
| Shooting (effective field-goal %) | 44.4% 251st | 43.3% 301st |
| Opponents' shooting | 46.9% 264th | 46.5% 244th |
| Turnovers, share of possessions | 25.6% 307th | 22.8% 120th |
| Offensive rebounds, share of misses | 30.5% 298th | 30.9% 284th |
| Free throws per shot | 0.20 252nd | 0.19 310th |
The widest gap: Queens's defense (226th) against Gardner-Webb's offense (321st), of 363 teams.
First half
- Projected halftime score
- Queens 28, Gardner-Webb 29
- First-half margin
- Gardner-Webb by 1.1
- First-half points, both teams
- 57.6
- Projected second half
- Queens 32, Gardner-Webb 32
- Second-half points, both teams
- 63.9
- Tied at the half
- 4%
- Queens, first halves so far
- Led 1 of 3 · 23.7 scored, 47.0 allowed
- Gardner-Webb, first halves so far
- Led 1 of 2 · 28.5 scored, 28.5 allowed
Our own projection, not a sportsbook's first-half line. On 10,911 past games it had not seen, the halftime leader was right 73.0% of the time and the first-half total was off by 8.0 points on average. This season: 404 of 492 halftime leaders right. Scorecard
Player projections
Queens
| Player | Min | Pts | Reb | Ast | 3s |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ashantay NobleG | 26 | 7.7 | 4.1 | 1.0 | 0.7 |
| 10+ pts 32% · 4+ reb 54% · 1+ threes 46% | |||||
| Makayla MinshallG | 25 | 8.5 | 3.5 | 1.5 | 0.9 |
| 10+ pts 37% · 4+ reb 44% · 1+ threes 55% | |||||
| Ryan DavisF | 22 | 7.1 | 4.3 | 0.8 | 0.1 |
| 5+ pts 66% · 4+ reb 57% · 2+ ast 20% | |||||
| Ahmani KlabundeG | 22 | 7.5 | 2.4 | 1.8 | 1.1 |
| 5+ pts 69% · 3+ reb 41% · 2+ ast 51% | |||||
| Brenae Jones-GrantF | 20 | 4.8 | 5.9 | 0.5 | 0.6 |
| 5+ pts 44% · 6+ reb 50% · 1+ threes 41% | |||||
| Mia MooreG | 18 | 3.9 | 2.7 | 1.1 | 0.3 |
| 5+ pts 34% · 3+ reb 48% · 2+ ast 31% | |||||
| Nykira ArringtonF | 14 | 4.2 | 3.7 | 0.5 | 0.1 |
| 5+ pts 37% · 4+ reb 47% | |||||
| Paulina ReichenaurG | 12 | 3.8 | 1.4 | 0.8 | 0.3 |
| 5+ pts 34% · 2+ reb 38% · 1+ threes 26% | |||||
Gardner-Webb
| Player | Min | Pts | Reb | Ast | 3s |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Laila TullG | 29 | 10.0 | 3.4 | 1.6 | 1.3 |
| 10+ pts 48% · 4+ reb 42% · 2+ ast 47% | |||||
| Makayla LegetteG | 28 | 5.1 | 2.9 | 3.5 | 0.7 |
| 5+ pts 47% · 3+ reb 52% · 1+ threes 46% | |||||
| Amira OfunniyinF | 25 | 9.0 | 6.2 | 0.8 | 0.0 |
| 10+ pts 41% · 6+ reb 54% · 2+ ast 19% | |||||
| Sara MenendezG | 24 | 4.3 | 3.2 | 0.8 | 1.2 |
| 5+ pts 39% · 3+ reb 57% · 1+ threes 63% | |||||
| Kayla MartinG | 23 | 4.8 | 5.1 | 0.9 | 0.3 |
| 5+ pts 45% · 5+ reb 54% · 1+ threes 24% | |||||
| Taryn ThompsonG | 21 | 6.8 | 2.2 | 1.0 | 1.1 |
| 5+ pts 63% · 2+ reb 59% · 1+ threes 62% | |||||
| Shiriah HarrisG | 18 | 6.0 | 2.0 | 0.9 | 0.5 |
| 5+ pts 56% · 2+ reb 54% · 1+ threes 35% | |||||
| Jordan BrooksG | 17 | 6.0 | 1.2 | 2.3 | 0.6 |
| 5+ pts 56% · 3+ ast 40% · 1+ threes 41% | |||||
Our own projections from each player's minutes and production, this opponent and the game's pace: not a sportsbook's lines. Under each name, the round numbers the player is about as likely as not to reach. How they have done
Win probability
Game chat
Loading the chat…