Akron Zips
Makes the tournament1%From 20,000 simulated seasons
Wins the national title0%Final Four 0% · projected 10-22
Net rating−9.6Rank 230 of 363 · offence 191, defence 290
Season outlook
- Projected record
- 10-22 (5 to 17 wins)
- Projected conference record
- 6-12
- Wins or shares the conference title
- 1%
- Wins the conference tournament
- 1%
- Average seed if in the field
- —
- A 1 seed
- 0%
- Makes the field1%
- Round of 320%
- Sweet 160%
- Elite Eight0%
- Final Four0%
- Title game0%
- Champion0%
Schedule and results
| Date | Opponent | Where | Win chance | Projected | Result | Pick |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mon 2 Nov | vs South Alabamarank 212 | Home | 58% | 83-80 | L 74-75 | Wrong |
| Thu 5 Nov | at George Masonrank 99 | Away | 4% | 59-82 | L 60-66 | Right |
| Mon 9 Nov6:30 PM ET | at Xavierrank 148 | Away | 18% | 63-75 | — |
Rooting guide
- Mon 9 Nov: at XavierA win: 1% · a loss: 1%0 pts
Early in the season other teams' results barely move a team's chances, so the list is mostly its own games; by February the bubble and conference races make other games matter.
Players
| Player | Games | Minutes | Points | Rebounds | Assists | Rating | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tyla HeardG · transfer from Oklahoma St | 2 | 32.0 | 9.0 | 5.5 | 2.5 | −1.2 | +0.6 |
| Macey FeganF · transfer from Cleveland St | 2 | 31.0 | 12.5 | 9.5 | 0.5 | −0.1 | +1.2 |
| Shaena BrewG | 2 | 28.5 | 11.5 | 4.0 | 4.0 | −2.6 | −0.2 |
| Jessie JoaquimF · transfer from New Mexico | 2 | 24.0 | 8.0 | 8.5 | 0.0 | +1.1 | +1.5 |
| Teniesha ClarkeG | 2 | 19.5 | 5.5 | 0.5 | 1.0 | −6.2 | −1.5 |
| Kailee BransfordG | 2 | 17.5 | 5.5 | 1.0 | 1.5 | −2.9 | −0.2 |
| Monique MitchellG | 2 | 16.0 | 7.0 | 1.5 | 0.0 | −2.5 | −0.1 |
| Kaylah ThorntonG | 2 | 13.5 | 5.0 | 1.5 | 0.5 | −2.7 | −0.1 |
| Kaylee KingF | 2 | 6.5 | 0.0 | 0.5 | 0.0 | −2.3 | 0.0 |
| Kam'Ren RhodesG | 1 | 8.0 | 3.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | −5.2 | −0.5 |
| Annika ManthyF · transfer from Richmond | 1 | 7.0 | 3.0 | 2.0 | 0.0 | +0.1 | +0.3 |
| Corinne ReedG | 2 | 3.5 | 0.0 | 0.5 | 0.0 | −3.7 | −0.1 |
Style and luck
Every teamThe Four Factors adjusted for opponents
| Offence | Defence | League | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ShootingEffective FG% · decides 44% of the margin | 43.7%rank 278 | 44.8%rank 212 | 44.7% |
| TurnoversTurnover rate · decides 27% of the margin | 22.8%rank 56 | 23.6%rank 236 | 23.9% |
| Offensive reboundsRebound rate · decides 20% of the margin | 31.4%rank 318 | 32.8%rank 120 | 33.3% |
| Free throwsFree throws per FG attempt · decides 9% of the margin | 22.9%rank 34 | 20.6%rank 143 | 20.8% |
Defence is what opponents managed. For turnovers a high defence figure is good; for the others, low is good.
Luck so far
- Wins against the pre-game chances
- 0.0 won, 0.6 expected (−0.6)
- Opponents' three-point shooting
- +2.4 points a game (they shot 24.3%, league 28.6%)
- Opponents' free throws
- −0.4 points a game
- Close games: by 5 or fewer, or overtime
- 0-1
Opponents' three-point shooting repeats little from one half of a season to the other (correlation 0.17), and their free throws even less (0.22), so a team living off either is likely to come back toward average. Positive numbers mean the luck has helped.
Rating this season
- Preseason net rating
- −12.1
- Last season's net rating
- −14.6
- Last season's minutes returning
- 36%
- Transfers in, weighted by minutes
- +1.9
- Change since preseason
- +2.5
- Offence, points per 100 possessions
- 87.8 (rank 191)
- Defence, points allowed per 100
- 97.4 (rank 290)
- Tempo, possessions per 40 minutes
- 74.6 (rank 52)
- Schedule so far, opponents' average
- −1.6 (rank 146)
Mid-American Conference by rating
| # | Team | Record | Conference | Net | Offence | Defence | National rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Miami (OH) | 2-0 | 0-0 | +9.5 | 91.8 | 82.4 | 80 |
| 2 | Ball State | 1-0 | 0-0 | +7.9 | 97.1 | 89.2 | 87 |
| 3 | Massachusetts | 0-1 | 0-0 | +0.6 | 91.2 | 90.6 | 134 |
| 4 | Toledo | 0-1 | 0-0 | +0.3 | 89.4 | 89.2 | 143 |
| 5 | Ohio | 1-0 | 0-0 | −1.9 | 87.5 | 89.5 | 159 |
| 6 | Kent State | 0-1 | 0-0 | −3.0 | 91.3 | 94.3 | 172 |
| 7 | Bowling Green | 2-0 | 0-0 | −3.3 | 90.2 | 93.5 | 179 |
| 8 | Eastern Michigan | 0-2 | 0-0 | −6.2 | 89.7 | 95.9 | 197 |
| 9 | Central Michigan | 0-2 | 0-0 | −7.4 | 82.7 | 90.1 | 207 |
| 10 | Akron | 0-2 | 0-0 | −9.6 | 87.8 | 97.4 | 230 |
| 11 | Buffalo | 1-0 | 0-0 | −12.2 | 86.8 | 99.0 | 255 |
| 12 | Western Michigan | 0-1 | 0-0 | −12.2 | 81.4 | 93.6 | 256 |