UIC at Saint Mary's
Friday, November 13, 2026, 10:00 PM ET at University Credit Union Pavilion. UIC our rank 97 · 3-0; Saint Mary's our rank 62 · 2-1.
Who will win UIC vs Saint Mary's?
The model gives Saint Mary's a 79% chance to beat UIC, with a projected score of Saint Mary's 79, UIC 70. The spread is Saint Mary's −5.5, with an over/under of 151.5. The model makes it Saint Mary's by 9.2, 3.7 points toward Saint Mary's, and projects 150 total points.
Half of games like thisFour in five
Calls of 70–80% have been right 74.5% of the time in 14,414 past games, and the typical miss on the margin is 8.8 points. After the final, the result is pinned to this strip. As of 2:23 AM ET on November 13, 2026. Updated three times a day until tip-off.
Players to watch
| Player | Pts | Reb | Ast | Last games | Chance of |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DentG · 35 min | 17.0 | 2.5 | 5.0 | 15+ 60% | |
| JuzenasG · 33 min | 14.2 | 7.8 | 3.0 | 15+ 44% | |
| Dent-SmithG · 24 min | 11.3 | 1.9 | 2.4 | 10+ 57% | |
| ZougrisF · 22 min | 8.7 | 5.4 | 1.6 | 10+ 39% | |
| Washington Jr.G · 28 min | 12.7 | 5.7 | 1.4 | 15+ 35% | |
| Henderson IIG · 24 min | 11.5 | 1.4 | 1.8 | 10+ 59% | |
| LoweryG · 28 min | 9.0 | 5.7 | 2.8 | 10+ 41% | |
| GealerG · 26 min | 8.5 | 1.7 | 2.1 | 10+ 37% | |
Bars: points in the player's latest games this season. Blue line: tonight's projection. Every regular's line
The game without one player
Without Joshua Dent: UIC 32%Saint Mary's 68%
The white mark is the call with him: Saint Mary's 79%.
| Player | Points a game he adds | Saint Mary's without him | Change | Projected score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Joshua Dent | 4.0 | 68% | −11 | 72–77 |
| Mantas Juzenas | 3.0 | 71% | −8 | 72–78 |
| Vangelis Zougris | 2.3 | 73% | −6 | 71–78 |
| Thomas Ndong | 2.1 | 73% | −6 | 71–78 |
| Benny Gealer | 1.9 | 84% | +5 | 69–80 |
| Rashund Washington Jr. | 1.9 | 83% | +4 | 69–80 |
| Mekhi Lowery | 1.8 | 83% | +4 | 69–80 |
| Ahmad Henderson II | 1.5 | 83% | +4 | 69–80 |
Change is in Saint Mary's's win chance, in points. Scores read UIC, then Saint Mary's. A player's value is what the team is better by with him than with a replacement, from the player ratings.
Model against the line
| Spread | Over/under | |
|---|---|---|
| Line | Saint Mary's −5.5 | 151.5 |
| Model | Saint Mary's −9.2 | 149.5 |
| Gap | 3.7 toward Saint Mary's | 2 lower |
A gap is a difference of opinion, not a tip. When the model and the line have been 2 or more points apart, the model's side has covered 51.6% of 3,317 games. This season the model's side has covered 163 of 337 spreads (48%); over 11,507 games in the last two seasons it covered 50.6%. It takes about 52.4% to break even at standard odds. Scorecard
Your call
All of today's gamesPlay-by-play
Team numbers
Form
UIC 3-0WWW
- Nov 9W 82-72vs UNC GreensboroDidn't cover −19.5 · Over 148.5
- Nov 6W 79-56vs Robert MorrisCovered −10.5 · Under 143.5
- Nov 2W 96-47vs St. Francis (IL)
- Last 3
- 3–0, scoring 85.7 and allowing 58.3
- Against the spread, this season
- 1–1
- Totals, this season
- 1 over, 1 under
Saint Mary's 2-1WWL
- Nov 8L 95-96vs NevadaCovered +1.5 · Over 146.5
- Nov 4W 105-64vs N Dakota StCovered −13.5 · Over 148.5
- Nov 2W 90-85vs Illinois St
- Last 3
- 2–1, scoring 96.7 and allowing 81.7
- Against the spread, this season
- 2–0
- Totals, this season
- 2 over, 0 under
The spread and the total are the lines logged with each prediction. Form is what happened; the ratings above already count recent games more.
Offense against defense
| UIC | Saint Mary's | |
|---|---|---|
| Points scored per 100 possessions | 109.3 97th | 115.0 53rd |
| Points allowed per 100 | 103.1 97th | 101.5 76th |
| Possessions a game | 70.0 266th | 69.9 276th |
| Shooting (effective field-goal %) | 50.4% 192nd | 54.2% 13th |
| Opponents' shooting | 51.2% 239th | 52.8% 325th |
| Turnovers, share of possessions | 17.1% 79th | 16.0% 11th |
| Offensive rebounds, share of misses | 32.3% 149th | 30.3% 270th |
| Free throws per shot | 0.27 129th | 0.22 342nd |
The widest gap: Saint Mary's's offense (53rd) against UIC's defense (97th), of 365 teams.
First half
- Projected halftime score
- UIC 33, Saint Mary's 38
- First-half margin
- Saint Mary's by 5.0
- First-half points, both teams
- 70.1
- Projected second half
- UIC 38, Saint Mary's 42
- Second-half points, both teams
- 79.4
- Tied at the half
- 4%
- UIC, first halves so far
- Led 2 of 3 · 38.0 scored, 31.7 allowed
- Saint Mary's, first halves so far
- Led 1 of 3 · 37.7 scored, 35.7 allowed
Our own projection, not a sportsbook's first-half line. On 11,516 past games it had not seen, the halftime leader was right 67.2% of the time and the first-half total was off by 8.1 points on average. This season: 366 of 476 halftime leaders right. Scorecard
Player projections
UIC
| Player | Min | Pts | Reb | Ast | 3s |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mekhi LoweryG | 28 | 9.0 | 5.7 | 2.8 | 0.0 |
| 10+ pts 41% · 6+ reb 48% · 3+ ast 51% | |||||
| Rashund Washington Jr.G | 28 | 12.7 | 5.7 | 1.4 | 0.9 |
| 15+ pts 35% · 6+ reb 48% · 1+ threes 55% | |||||
| Jayce NathanielF | 26 | 7.6 | 4.6 | 0.9 | 0.7 |
| 5+ pts 69% · 5+ reb 46% · 1+ threes 46% | |||||
| Benny GealerG | 26 | 8.5 | 1.7 | 2.1 | 2.0 |
| 10+ pts 37% · 2+ reb 45% · 2+ threes 53% | |||||
| Gabe CuppsG | 25 | 6.4 | 2.5 | 2.4 | 0.7 |
| 5+ pts 60% · 3+ reb 42% · 1+ threes 50% | |||||
| Ahmad Henderson IIG | 24 | 11.5 | 1.4 | 1.8 | 1.6 |
| 10+ pts 59% · 2+ ast 51% · 2+ threes 44% | |||||
| Lucas ScrogginsF | 18 | 6.7 | 4.1 | 0.3 | 0.0 |
| 5+ pts 62% · 4+ reb 55% | |||||
| Elijah GarrettG | 15 | 3.1 | 1.5 | 0.7 | 0.5 |
| 5+ pts 26% · 2+ reb 42% · 1+ threes 36% | |||||
Saint Mary's
| Player | Min | Pts | Reb | Ast | 3s |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Joshua DentG | 35 | 17.0 | 2.5 | 5.0 | 2.2 |
| 15+ pts 60% · 5+ ast 54% · 2+ threes 58% | |||||
| Mantas JuzenasG | 33 | 14.2 | 7.8 | 3.0 | 2.1 |
| 15+ pts 44% · 8+ reb 50% · 3+ ast 55% | |||||
| Jeremy Dent-SmithG | 24 | 11.3 | 1.9 | 2.4 | 1.7 |
| 10+ pts 57% · 2+ reb 51% · 2+ threes 46% | |||||
| Vangelis ZougrisF | 22 | 8.7 | 5.4 | 1.6 | 0.1 |
| 10+ pts 39% · 6+ reb 45% · 2+ ast 44% | |||||
| Thomas NdongF | 21 | 7.2 | 6.4 | 0.6 | 0.1 |
| 5+ pts 67% · 7+ reb 45% | |||||
| Rory HawkeG | 20 | 5.2 | 2.5 | 0.9 | 0.7 |
| 5+ pts 48% · 3+ reb 43% · 1+ threes 48% | |||||
| Darius BivinsG | 20 | 8.0 | 1.9 | 2.4 | 0.6 |
| 10+ pts 34% · 2+ reb 53% · 1+ threes 45% | |||||
| Jazz GardnerC | 16 | 5.5 | 3.3 | 0.8 | 0.2 |
| 5+ pts 51% · 3+ reb 59% · 2+ ast 21% | |||||
Our own projections from each player's minutes and production, this opponent and the game's pace: not a sportsbook's lines. Under each name, the round numbers the player is about as likely as not to reach. How they have done
Win probability
Game chat
Loading the chat…