DePaul at Northwestern
Friday, November 13, 2026, 9:00 PM ET at Welsh-Ryan Arena. DePaul our rank 81 · 3-0; Northwestern our rank 69 · 3-0.
Who will win DePaul vs Northwestern?
The model gives Northwestern a 68% chance to beat DePaul, with a projected score of Northwestern 74, DePaul 68. The spread is DePaul −1.5, with an over/under of 139.5. The model makes it Northwestern by 5.4, 6.9 points toward Northwestern, and projects 142 total points.
Half of games like thisFour in five
Calls of 60–70% have been right 64.8% of the time in 15,721 past games, and the typical miss on the margin is 8.8 points. After the final, the result is pinned to this strip. As of 2:23 AM ET on November 13, 2026. Updated three times a day until tip-off.
Players to watch
| Player | Pts | Reb | Ast | Last games | Chance of |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| KarasinskiF · 25 min | 18.0 | 3.6 | 1.0 | 20+ 38% | |
| PrattG · 34 min | 16.7 | 3.5 | 2.7 | 15+ 59% | |
| WestG · 34 min | 15.3 | 2.1 | 5.8 | 15+ 51% | |
| CiaravinoG · 35 min | 10.3 | 6.3 | 1.7 | 10+ 50% | |
| CottonG · 24 min | 11.0 | 4.3 | 1.3 | 10+ 55% | |
| PopoolaG · 31 min | 10.7 | 3.7 | 0.9 | 10+ 53% | |
| HolmesG · 22 min | 10.1 | 3.4 | 1.4 | 10+ 49% | |
| BlockerG · 28 min | 9.8 | 2.7 | 2.7 | 10+ 47% | |
Bars: points in the player's latest games this season. Blue line: tonight's projection. Every regular's line
The game without one player
Without Angelo Ciaravino: DePaul 42%Northwestern 58%
The white mark is the call with him: Northwestern 68%.
| Player | Points a game he adds | Northwestern without him | Change | Projected score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Angelo Ciaravino | 3.2 | 58% | −10 | 70–72 |
| Jake West | 2.7 | 60% | −8 | 70–72 |
| Okku Federiko | 1.9 | 62% | −6 | 69–73 |
| LA Pratt | 1.4 | 64% | −4 | 69–73 |
| Koree Cotton | 2.1 | 75% | +7 | 67–75 |
| Ade Popoola | 2.1 | 75% | +7 | 67–75 |
| Magoon Gwath | 1.9 | 74% | +6 | 67–75 |
| Fabian Flores | 1.6 | 74% | +6 | 67–75 |
Change is in Northwestern's win chance, in points. Scores read DePaul, then Northwestern. A player's value is what the team is better by with him than with a replacement, from the player ratings.
Model against the line
| Spread | Over/under | |
|---|---|---|
| Line | DePaul −1.5 | 139.5 |
| Model | Northwestern −5.4 | 142.0 |
| Gap | 6.9 toward Northwestern | 2.5 higher |
A gap is a difference of opinion, not a tip. When the model and the line have been 4 or more points apart, the model's side has covered 48.4% of 702 games. This season the model's side has covered 163 of 337 spreads (48%); over 11,507 games in the last two seasons it covered 50.6%. It takes about 52.4% to break even at standard odds. Scorecard
Your call
All of today's gamesPlay-by-play
Team numbers
Form
DePaul 3-0WWW
- Nov 9W 84-47vs Alabama A&MCovered −23.5 · Under 139.5
- Nov 5W 82-80vs South FloridaDidn't cover −6.5 · Over 149.5
- Nov 2W 75-58vs West Georgia
- Last 3
- 3–0, scoring 80.3 and allowing 61.7
- Against the spread, this season
- 1–1
- Totals, this season
- 1 over, 1 under
Northwestern 3-0WWW
- Nov 9W 72-55vs Boston UCovered −13.5 · Under 143.5
- Nov 6W 78-65vs Stony BrookCovered −12.5 · Under 144.5
- Nov 2W 86-60vs Binghamton
- Last 3
- 3–0, scoring 78.7 and allowing 60.0
- Against the spread, this season
- 2–0
- Totals, this season
- 0 over, 2 under
The spread and the total are the lines logged with each prediction. Form is what happened; the ratings above already count recent games more.
Offense against defense
| DePaul | Northwestern | |
|---|---|---|
| Points scored per 100 possessions | 108.2 108th | 112.9 68th |
| Points allowed per 100 | 98.8 43rd | 101.2 73rd |
| Possessions a game | 70.2 245th | 68.8 344th |
| Shooting (effective field-goal %) | 50.1% 215th | 51.8% 92nd |
| Opponents' shooting | 49.6% 118th | 50.4% 182nd |
| Turnovers, share of possessions | 18.2% 201st | 16.6% 38th |
| Offensive rebounds, share of misses | 30.7% 253rd | 30.8% 251st |
| Free throws per shot | 0.27 125th | 0.26 191st |
The widest gap: Northwestern's defense (73rd) against DePaul's offense (108th), of 365 teams.
First half
- Projected halftime score
- DePaul 32, Northwestern 35
- First-half margin
- Northwestern by 2.9
- First-half points, both teams
- 66.6
- Projected second half
- DePaul 36, Northwestern 39
- Second-half points, both teams
- 75.4
- Tied at the half
- 4%
- DePaul, first halves so far
- Led 2 of 3 · 38.7 scored, 31.0 allowed
- Northwestern, first halves so far
- Led 3 of 3 · 44.7 scored, 29.7 allowed
Our own projection, not a sportsbook's first-half line. On 11,516 past games it had not seen, the halftime leader was right 67.2% of the time and the first-half total was off by 8.1 points on average. This season: 366 of 476 halftime leaders right. Scorecard
Player projections
DePaul
| Player | Min | Pts | Reb | Ast | 3s |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ade PopoolaG | 31 | 10.7 | 3.7 | 0.9 | 2.8 |
| 10+ pts 53% · 4+ reb 48% · 3+ threes 49% | |||||
| Layden BlockerG | 28 | 9.8 | 2.7 | 2.7 | 1.1 |
| 10+ pts 47% · 3+ reb 47% · 3+ ast 49% | |||||
| Noah MeeusenG | 28 | 7.8 | 3.3 | 3.6 | 1.2 |
| 45% to play · 10+ pts 32% · 3+ reb 59% · 4+ ast 47% | |||||
| Kruz McClureG | 27 | 6.7 | 2.5 | 2.0 | 1.4 |
| 5+ pts 62% · 3+ reb 43% · 2+ ast 57% | |||||
| Koree CottonG | 24 | 11.0 | 4.3 | 1.3 | 1.4 |
| 10+ pts 55% · 4+ reb 58% · 2+ threes 39% | |||||
| Fabian FloresC | 22 | 6.5 | 5.7 | 0.7 | 0.1 |
| 5+ pts 60% · 6+ reb 48% · 2+ ast 18% | |||||
| Kahmare HolmesG | 22 | 10.1 | 3.4 | 1.4 | 0.9 |
| 10+ pts 49% · 4+ reb 42% · 1+ threes 56% | |||||
| Magoon GwathF | 19 | 9.0 | 3.6 | 0.7 | 0.9 |
| 10+ pts 41% · 4+ reb 46% · 1+ threes 55% | |||||
Missed the last game: Noah Meeusen (32 min a game).
Northwestern
| Player | Min | Pts | Reb | Ast | 3s |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Angelo CiaravinoG | 35 | 10.3 | 6.3 | 1.7 | 0.7 |
| 10+ pts 50% · 2+ ast 48% · 1+ threes 47% | |||||
| LA PrattG | 34 | 16.7 | 3.5 | 2.7 | 1.8 |
| 15+ pts 59% · 3+ ast 48% · 2+ threes 50% | |||||
| Jake WestG | 34 | 15.3 | 2.1 | 5.8 | 1.9 |
| 15+ pts 51% · 6+ ast 51% · 2+ threes 52% | |||||
| Okku FederikoF | 28 | 6.2 | 4.6 | 1.7 | 0.3 |
| 5+ pts 58% · 5+ reb 46% · 2+ ast 48% | |||||
| Jack KarasinskiF | 25 | 18.0 | 3.6 | 1.0 | 2.5 |
| 25% to play · 20+ pts 38% · 4+ reb 46% · 3+ threes 43% | |||||
| Phoenix GillG | 20 | 6.6 | 2.8 | 0.9 | 0.8 |
| 5+ pts 61% · 3+ reb 49% · 1+ threes 52% | |||||
| Colin SmithF | 19 | 5.5 | 2.2 | 0.8 | 1.0 |
| 5+ pts 51% · 2+ reb 58% · 1+ threes 57% | |||||
| Ryan SoulisF | 14 | 3.5 | 3.3 | 0.9 | 0.1 |
| 5+ pts 30% · 3+ reb 59% · 2+ ast 24% | |||||
Missed the last game: Jack Karasinski (28 min a game).
Our own projections from each player's minutes and production, this opponent and the game's pace: not a sportsbook's lines. Under each name, the round numbers the player is about as likely as not to reach. How they have done
Win probability
Game chat
Loading the chat…