Mount St Marys at Virginia Tech
Friday, November 13, 2026, 7:00 PM ET at Cassell Coliseum. Mount St Marys our rank 284 · 1-1; Virginia Tech our rank 53 · 3-0.
Who will win Mount St Marys vs Virginia Tech?
The model gives Virginia Tech a 99% chance to beat Mount St. Mary's, with a projected score of Virginia Tech 86, Mount St Marys 61. The spread is Virginia Tech −28.5, with an over/under of 150.5. The model makes it Virginia Tech by 25.0, 3.5 points toward Mount St Marys, and projects 147 total points.
Half of games like thisFour in five
Calls of 90–100% have been right 95.4% of the time in 11,767 past games, and the typical miss on the margin is 8.8 points. After the final, the result is pinned to this strip. As of 2:23 AM ET on November 13, 2026. Updated three times a day until tip-off.
Players to watch
| Player | Pts | Reb | Ast | Last games | Chance of |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HammondG · 29 min | 19.4 | 2.9 | 4.7 | 20+ 46% | |
| HansberryF · 30 min | 17.6 | 6.8 | 2.9 | 20+ 37% | |
| CurryG · 27 min | 16.3 | 3.3 | 3.4 | 15+ 57% | |
| ElohimG · 24 min | 11.3 | 3.6 | 1.0 | 10+ 57% | |
| Khadre KebeG · 27 min | 10.3 | 5.4 | 1.0 | 10+ 50% | |
| Thompson Jr.G · 29 min | 10.2 | 2.6 | 2.6 | 10+ 50% | |
| Jr. ExacteF · 26 min | 9.7 | 5.5 | 1.5 | 10+ 46% | |
| Arrington Jr.G · 23 min | 6.8 | 2.2 | 1.2 | 5+ 63% | |
Bars: points in the player's latest games this season. Blue line: tonight's projection. Every regular's line
The game without one player
Without Amani Hansberry: Mount St Marys 3%Virginia Tech 97%
The white mark is the call with him: Virginia Tech 99%.
| Player | Points a game he adds | Virginia Tech without him | Change | Projected score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amani Hansberry | 3.6 | 97% | −2 | 63–84 |
| Ben Hammond | 3.4 | 97% | −2 | 63–84 |
| Jaylen Curry | 2.4 | 98% | −1 | 62–85 |
| Tyler Johnson | 2.2 | 98% | −1 | 62–85 |
| Cade Orness | 0.7 | 99% | 0 | 61–86 |
Change is in Virginia Tech's win chance, in points. Scores read Mount St Marys, then Virginia Tech. A player's value is what the team is better by with him than with a replacement, from the player ratings.
Model against the line
| Spread | Over/under | |
|---|---|---|
| Line | Virginia Tech −28.5 | 150.5 |
| Model | Virginia Tech −25 | 147.0 |
| Gap | 3.5 toward Mount St Marys | 3.5 lower |
A gap is a difference of opinion, not a tip. When the model and the line have been 2 or more points apart, the model's side has covered 51.6% of 3,317 games. This season the model's side has covered 163 of 337 spreads (48%); over 11,507 games in the last two seasons it covered 50.6%. It takes about 52.4% to break even at standard odds. Scorecard
Your call
All of today's gamesPlay-by-play
Team numbers
Form
Mount St Marys 1-1LW
- Last 2
- 1–1, scoring 60.0 and allowing 77.0
- Against the spread, this season
- 1–0
- Totals, this season
- 0 over, 1 under
The spread and the total are the lines logged with each prediction. Form is what happened; the ratings above already count recent games more.
Offense against defense
| Mount St Marys | Virginia Tech | |
|---|---|---|
| Points scored per 100 possessions | 95.6 331st | 115.8 45th |
| Points allowed per 100 | 107.9 170th | 100.4 67th |
| Possessions a game | 71.1 143rd | 70.7 196th |
| Shooting (effective field-goal %) | 47.5% 346th | 53.3% 26th |
| Opponents' shooting | 49.6% 121st | 49.8% 132nd |
| Turnovers, share of possessions | 18.4% 216th | 16.5% 27th |
| Offensive rebounds, share of misses | 29.6% 301st | 33.0% 107th |
| Free throws per shot | 0.24 265th | 0.28 79th |
The widest gap: Virginia Tech's defense (67th) against Mount St Marys's offense (331st), of 365 teams.
First half
- Projected halftime score
- Mount St Marys 28, Virginia Tech 41
- First-half margin
- Virginia Tech by 13.7
- First-half points, both teams
- 69.0
- Projected second half
- Mount St Marys 33, Virginia Tech 45
- Second-half points, both teams
- 78.0
- Tied at the half
- 4%
- Mount St Marys, first halves so far
- Led 1 of 2 · 22.5 scored, 36.5 allowed
- Virginia Tech, first halves so far
- Led 2 of 2 · 46.0 scored, 25.5 allowed
Our own projection, not a sportsbook's first-half line. On 11,516 past games it had not seen, the halftime leader was right 67.2% of the time and the first-half total was off by 8.1 points on average. This season: 366 of 476 halftime leaders right. Scorecard
Player projections
Mount St Marys
| Player | Min | Pts | Reb | Ast | 3s |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redd Thompson Jr.G | 29 | 10.2 | 2.6 | 2.6 | 1.7 |
| 10+ pts 50% · 3+ ast 46% · 2+ threes 48% | |||||
| Abdou Khadre KebeG | 27 | 10.3 | 5.4 | 1.0 | 1.4 |
| 10+ pts 50% · 6+ reb 44% · 2+ threes 38% | |||||
| Wilguens Jr. ExacteF | 26 | 9.7 | 5.5 | 1.5 | 0.9 |
| 10+ pts 46% · 6+ reb 45% · 1+ threes 56% | |||||
| Anthony Arrington Jr.G | 23 | 6.8 | 2.2 | 1.2 | 0.9 |
| 5+ pts 63% · 2+ reb 58% · 1+ threes 57% | |||||
| Yakhya DiopF | 22 | 3.1 | 5.5 | 0.4 | 0.1 |
| 5+ pts 26% · 6+ reb 45% | |||||
| Cade OrnessG | 18 | 2.9 | 1.3 | 0.4 | 0.4 |
| 5+ pts 23% · 2+ reb 35% · 1+ threes 30% | |||||
| Anastasios RozakeasG | 16 | 3.8 | 2.1 | 0.7 | 0.9 |
| 5+ pts 33% · 2+ reb 56% · 1+ threes 57% | |||||
| Noah LimolF | 15 | 3.6 | 2.8 | 0.4 | 0.2 |
| 5+ pts 32% · 3+ reb 50% · 1+ threes 16% | |||||
Virginia Tech
| Player | Min | Pts | Reb | Ast | 3s |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amani HansberryF | 30 | 17.6 | 6.8 | 2.9 | 1.3 |
| 20+ pts 37% · 7+ reb 50% · 3+ ast 53% | |||||
| Ben HammondG | 29 | 19.4 | 2.9 | 4.7 | 2.2 |
| 20+ pts 46% · 3+ reb 51% · 5+ ast 49% | |||||
| Jaylen CurryG | 27 | 16.3 | 3.3 | 3.4 | 1.4 |
| 15+ pts 57% · 3+ reb 58% · 4+ ast 43% | |||||
| Tyler JohnsonG | 25 | 8.3 | 5.3 | 2.0 | 0.7 |
| 10+ pts 36% · 5+ reb 57% · 1+ threes 48% | |||||
| Isaiah ElohimG | 24 | 11.3 | 3.6 | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| 10+ pts 57% · 4+ reb 46% · 1+ threes 58% | |||||
| Miles HeideF | 18 | 5.3 | 4.6 | 0.8 | 0.1 |
| 5+ pts 49% · 5+ reb 47% · 2+ ast 19% | |||||
| Butta JohnsonG | 17 | 5.8 | 1.6 | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| 5+ pts 54% · 2+ reb 44% · 1+ threes 59% | |||||
| Musa SagniaC | 12 | 2.0 | 3.0 | 0.3 | 0.0 |
| 5+ pts 15% · 3+ reb 53% | |||||
Our own projections from each player's minutes and production, this opponent and the game's pace: not a sportsbook's lines. Under each name, the round numbers the player is about as likely as not to reach. How they have done
Win probability
Game chat
Loading the chat…