Texas A&M-CC at Oral Roberts
Saturday, November 21, 2026, 8:00 PM ET at Mabee Center. Texas A&M-CC our rank 201 · 2-1; Oral Roberts our rank 304 · 1-2.
Who will win Texas A&M-CC vs Oral Roberts?
The model gives Texas A&M-Corpus Christi a 61% chance to beat Oral Roberts, with a projected score of Texas A&M-CC 74, Oral Roberts 70.
Half of games like thisFour in five
Calls of 60–70% have been right 64.8% of the time in 15,721 past games, and the typical miss on the margin is 8.8 points. After the final, the result is pinned to this strip. As of 2:23 AM ET on November 13, 2026. Updated three times a day until tip-off.
Players to watch
| Player | Pts | Reb | Ast | Last games | Chance of |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Texas A&M-CC | |||||
| Michelini-JacksonG · 22 min | 8.5 | 3.1 | 1.5 | 10+ 37% | |
| Kent Jr.G · 17 min | 7.3 | 2.1 | 1.0 | 5+ 67% | |
| MukunaF · 22 min | 7.1 | 4.3 | 0.6 | 5+ 66% | |
| BasilF · 17 min | 6.9 | 5.1 | 0.7 | 5+ 64% | |
| Oral Roberts | |||||
| GrayF · 27 min | 16.8 | 5.0 | 0.9 | 15+ 60% | |
| WilliamsG · 32 min | 12.8 | 3.6 | 2.3 | 15+ 35% | |
| DowG · 34 min | 11.4 | 4.1 | 1.6 | 10+ 58% | |
| FurnishG · 30 min | 8.1 | 3.8 | 3.6 | 10+ 34% | |
Bars: points in the player's latest games this season. Blue line: tonight's projection. Every regular's line
The game without one player
Without Daniel Michelini-Jackson: Texas A&M-CC 59%Oral Roberts 41%
The white mark is the call with him: Texas A&M-CC 61%.
| Player | Points a game he adds | Texas A&M-CC without him | Change | Projected score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Texas A&M-CC | ||||
| Daniel Michelini-Jackson | 0.6 | 59% | −2 | 73–71 |
Change is in Texas A&M-CC's win chance, in points. Scores read Texas A&M-CC, then Oral Roberts. A player's value is what the team is better by with him than with a replacement, from the player ratings.
Model against the line
Your call
All of today's gamesPlay-by-play
Team numbers
Form
Texas A&M-CC 2-1LWW
- Nov 10W 102-58vs Dallas Christian
- Nov 6W 67-60at LouisianaCovered +3.5 · Under 129.5
- Nov 2L 55-67at Texas St
- Last 3
- 2–1, scoring 74.7 and allowing 61.7
- Against the spread, this season
- 1–0
- Totals, this season
- 0 over, 1 under
Oral Roberts 1-2LWL
- Nov 11L 71-80at TulsaCovered +18.5 · Under 155.5
- Nov 7W 94-39vs Northwestern (OK)
- Nov 2L 55-85at C Arkansas
- Last 3
- 1–2, scoring 73.3 and allowing 68.0
- Against the spread, this season
- 1–0
- Totals, this season
- 0 over, 1 under
The spread and the total are the lines logged with each prediction. Form is what happened; the ratings above already count recent games more.
Offense against defense
| Texas A&M-CC | Oral Roberts | |
|---|---|---|
| Points scored per 100 possessions | 100.0 270th | 99.5 282nd |
| Points allowed per 100 | 106.6 141st | 113.5 316th |
| Possessions a game | 69.7 292nd | 70.8 184th |
| Shooting (effective field-goal %) | 50.6% 176th | 48.1% 330th |
| Opponents' shooting | 48.5% 47th | 50.3% 166th |
| Turnovers, share of possessions | 19.5% 321st | 18.9% 277th |
| Offensive rebounds, share of misses | 33.6% 80th | 35.8% 11th |
| Free throws per shot | 0.29 60th | 0.26 162nd |
The widest gap: Texas A&M-CC's defense (141st) against Oral Roberts's offense (282nd), of 365 teams.
First half
- Projected halftime score
- Texas A&M-CC 35, Oral Roberts 33
- First-half margin
- Texas A&M-CC by 1.8
- First-half points, both teams
- 67.6
- Projected second half
- Texas A&M-CC 39, Oral Roberts 38
- Second-half points, both teams
- 76.5
- Tied at the half
- 4%
- Texas A&M-CC, first halves so far
- Led 2 of 3 · 36.0 scored, 30.3 allowed
- Oral Roberts, first halves so far
- Led 2 of 3 · 39.3 scored, 33.7 allowed
Our own projection, not a sportsbook's first-half line. On 11,516 past games it had not seen, the halftime leader was right 67.2% of the time and the first-half total was off by 8.1 points on average. This season: 366 of 476 halftime leaders right. Scorecard
Player projections
Texas A&M-CC
| Player | Min | Pts | Reb | Ast | 3s |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dan MukunaF | 22 | 7.1 | 4.3 | 0.6 | 0.4 |
| 5+ pts 66% · 4+ reb 58% · 1+ threes 30% | |||||
| Daniel Michelini-JacksonG | 22 | 8.5 | 3.1 | 1.5 | 1.3 |
| 10+ pts 37% · 3+ reb 56% · 2+ ast 41% | |||||
| Lamin FoonC | 17 | 6.3 | 4.1 | 0.6 | 0.1 |
| 5+ pts 59% · 4+ reb 55% | |||||
| Desmond Kent Jr.G | 17 | 7.3 | 2.1 | 1.0 | 0.5 |
| 5+ pts 67% · 2+ reb 57% · 1+ threes 41% | |||||
| Bin BasilF | 17 | 6.9 | 5.1 | 0.7 | 0.1 |
| 5+ pts 64% · 5+ reb 53% · 2+ ast 17% | |||||
| Bryson WheatfallG | 17 | 4.4 | 2.8 | 1.1 | 0.4 |
| 5+ pts 39% · 3+ reb 50% · 1+ threes 34% | |||||
| Sebastian RobinsonG | 16 | 6.6 | 1.6 | 1.1 | 0.3 |
| 5+ pts 61% · 2+ reb 43% · 2+ ast 29% | |||||
| CJ WorshamF | 15 | 6.1 | 3.2 | 0.4 | 0.2 |
| 5+ pts 56% · 3+ reb 56% · 1+ threes 15% | |||||
Oral Roberts
| Player | Min | Pts | Reb | Ast | 3s |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Connor DowG | 34 | 11.4 | 4.1 | 1.6 | 2.2 |
| 10+ pts 58% · 4+ reb 54% · 2+ ast 44% | |||||
| Boden WilliamsG | 32 | 12.8 | 3.6 | 2.3 | 2.4 |
| 15+ pts 35% · 4+ reb 45% · 3+ threes 41% | |||||
| Cal FurnishG | 30 | 8.1 | 3.8 | 3.6 | 1.4 |
| 10+ pts 34% · 4+ reb 49% · 4+ ast 48% | |||||
| Luke GrayF | 27 | 16.8 | 5.0 | 0.9 | 2.0 |
| 15+ pts 60% · 5+ reb 53% · 2+ threes 54% | |||||
| Martins KilupsG | 24 | 4.6 | 3.6 | 1.1 | 1.0 |
| 5+ pts 42% · 4+ reb 46% · 1+ threes 59% | |||||
| Chase MartinG | 18 | 3.2 | 3.0 | 1.6 | 0.2 |
| 5+ pts 27% · 3+ reb 53% · 2+ ast 46% | |||||
| Alex CoutoG | 15 | 4.0 | 2.0 | 1.0 | 1.1 |
| 51% to play · 5+ pts 36% · 2+ reb 54% · 1+ threes 63% | |||||
| Amire RobinsonG | 14 | 3.6 | 2.3 | 0.9 | 0.6 |
| 5+ pts 32% · 2+ reb 60% · 1+ threes 45% | |||||
Missed the last game: Alex Couto (18 min a game).
Our own projections from each player's minutes and production, this opponent and the game's pace: not a sportsbook's lines. Under each name, the round numbers the player is about as likely as not to reach. How they have done
Win probability
Game chat
Loading the chat…