Montana St at UNLV
Women's · Sunday, November 15, 2026, 4:00 PM ET at The Pavilion. Montana St our rank 64 · 2-0; UNLV our rank 93 · 1-2.
Who will win Montana St vs UNLV?
The model gives Montana State a 53% chance to beat UNLV, with a projected score of Montana St 68, UNLV 67.
Half of games like thisFour in five
Calls of 50–60% have been right 55.7% of the time in 7,540 past games, and the typical miss on the margin is 9.5 points. After the final, the result is pinned to this strip. As of 2:23 AM ET on November 13, 2026. Updated three times a day until tip-off.
Players to watch
| Player | Pts | Reb | Ast | Last games | Chance of |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HarrisF · 27 min | 16.0 | 4.7 | 1.1 | 15+ 55% | |
| ChirrickG · 30 min | 12.5 | 6.8 | 3.1 | 10+ 65% | |
| EricksonF · 17 min | 7.2 | 2.9 | 0.5 | 5+ 67% | |
| PhilipG · 24 min | 7.1 | 2.9 | 2.6 | 5+ 66% | |
| LottG · 34 min | 15.2 | 2.6 | 0.9 | 15+ 50% | |
| RolandF · 30 min | 12.1 | 7.4 | 2.8 | 10+ 63% | |
| ConstantG · 29 min | 9.5 | 3.4 | 2.9 | 10+ 45% | |
| WashenitzG · 24 min | 7.7 | 3.6 | 1.7 | 10+ 31% | |
Bars: points in the player's latest games this season. Blue line: tonight's projection. Every regular's line
The game without one player
Without Taylee Chirrick: Montana St 36%UNLV 64%
The white mark is the call with her: Montana St 53%.
| Player | Points a game she adds | Montana St without her | Change | Projected score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Taylee Chirrick | 4.8 | 36% | −17 | 66–70 |
| Addison Harris | 2.7 | 43% | −10 | 67–69 |
| Ella Johnson | 2.5 | 44% | −9 | 67–69 |
| Jamison Philip | 1.9 | 46% | −7 | 67–68 |
| Meadow Roland | 3.4 | 65% | +12 | 70–66 |
| Jasmyn Lott | 2.4 | 62% | +9 | 69–66 |
| Marley Washenitz | 2.2 | 61% | +8 | 69–66 |
| Norah Moo | 1.8 | 60% | +7 | 69–66 |
Change is in Montana St's win chance, in points. Scores read Montana St, then UNLV. A player's value is what the team is better by with her than with a replacement, from the player ratings.
Model against the line
Your call
All of today's gamesPlay-by-play
Team numbers
Form
Montana St 2-0WW
- Last 2
- 2–0, scoring 78.5 and allowing 51.5
The spread and the total are the lines logged with each prediction. Form is what happened; the ratings above already count recent games more.
Offense against defense
| Montana St | UNLV | |
|---|---|---|
| Points scored per 100 possessions | 97.4 95th | 98.0 90th |
| Points allowed per 100 | 83.2 47th | 90.1 110th |
| Possessions a game | 74.1 43rd | 71.9 193rd |
| Shooting (effective field-goal %) | 44.6% 238th | 43.3% 304th |
| Opponents' shooting | 45.9% 204th | 45.7% 192nd |
| Turnovers, share of possessions | 24.3% 249th | 24.5% 260th |
| Offensive rebounds, share of misses | 33.7% 139th | 35.5% 57th |
| Free throws per shot | 0.23 78th | 0.23 81st |
The widest gap: Montana St's defense (47th) against UNLV's offense (90th), of 363 teams.
First half
- Projected halftime score
- Montana St 32, UNLV 32
- First-half margin
- Montana St by 0.5
- First-half points, both teams
- 64.2
- Projected second half
- Montana St 36, UNLV 35
- Second-half points, both teams
- 71.2
- Tied at the half
- 4%
- Montana St, first halves so far
- Led 2 of 2 · 43.0 scored, 26.0 allowed
- UNLV, first halves so far
- Led 1 of 3 · 30.0 scored, 35.0 allowed
Our own projection, not a sportsbook's first-half line. On 10,911 past games it had not seen, the halftime leader was right 73.0% of the time and the first-half total was off by 8.0 points on average. This season: 404 of 492 halftime leaders right. Scorecard
Player projections
Montana St
| Player | Min | Pts | Reb | Ast | 3s |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Taylee ChirrickG | 30 | 12.5 | 6.8 | 3.1 | 1.2 |
| 10+ pts 65% · 7+ reb 49% · 3+ ast 57% | |||||
| Ella JohnsonF | 28 | 6.3 | 4.6 | 1.0 | 0.3 |
| 5+ pts 59% · 5+ reb 46% · 2+ ast 27% | |||||
| Addison HarrisF | 27 | 16.0 | 4.7 | 1.1 | 1.2 |
| 15+ pts 55% · 5+ reb 48% · 1+ threes 64% | |||||
| Jamison PhilipG | 24 | 7.1 | 2.9 | 2.6 | 0.5 |
| 5+ pts 66% · 3+ reb 51% · 3+ ast 47% | |||||
| Isobel BunyanG | 19 | 4.5 | 1.9 | 0.4 | 1.1 |
| 5+ pts 41% · 2+ reb 52% · 1+ threes 60% | |||||
| Brianne BaileyG | 18 | 6.5 | 2.9 | 1.7 | 0.8 |
| 5+ pts 61% · 3+ reb 51% · 1+ threes 51% | |||||
| Dylan PhilipG | 18 | 4.7 | 1.9 | 1.0 | 0.7 |
| 5+ pts 43% · 2+ reb 51% · 1+ threes 45% | |||||
| Teagan EricksonF | 17 | 7.2 | 2.9 | 0.5 | 0.9 |
| 5+ pts 67% · 3+ reb 50% · 1+ threes 53% | |||||
UNLV
| Player | Min | Pts | Reb | Ast | 3s |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jasmyn LottG | 34 | 15.2 | 2.6 | 0.9 | 1.8 |
| 15+ pts 50% · 3+ reb 46% · 2+ threes 49% | |||||
| Meadow RolandF | 30 | 12.1 | 7.4 | 2.8 | 0.8 |
| 10+ pts 63% · 3+ ast 50% · 1+ threes 51% | |||||
| Jayla ConstantG | 29 | 9.5 | 3.4 | 2.9 | 1.3 |
| 10+ pts 45% · 4+ reb 42% · 3+ ast 53% | |||||
| Norah MooF | 26 | 5.2 | 7.6 | 0.7 | 0.1 |
| 5+ pts 48% · 8+ reb 47% · 2+ ast 18% | |||||
| Marley WashenitzG | 24 | 7.7 | 3.6 | 1.7 | 1.4 |
| 10+ pts 31% · 4+ reb 46% · 2+ ast 49% | |||||
| Trystan JamesF | 22 | 4.9 | 5.3 | 0.7 | 0.4 |
| 5+ pts 45% · 5+ reb 56% · 1+ threes 30% | |||||
| Bergan KinnebrewG | 22 | 6.0 | 2.3 | 1.3 | 0.7 |
| 5+ pts 57% · 2+ reb 61% · 1+ threes 48% | |||||
Our own projections from each player's minutes and production, this opponent and the game's pace: not a sportsbook's lines. Under each name, the round numbers the player is about as likely as not to reach. How they have done
Win probability
Game chat
Loading the chat…