USC Trojans
Next: vs Utah State · Sun 8 Nov, 8 PM ETProjected 92-46 · Game page
Makes the tournament89%From 20,000 simulated seasons · average seed 3.8
Wins the national title1%Final Four 9% · projected 23-10
Net rating+31.5Rank 15 of 363 · offence 17, defence 14
Season outlook
- Projected record
- 23-10 (17 to 28 wins)
- Projected conference record
- 11-7
- Wins or shares the conference title
- 6%
- Wins the conference tournament
- 5%
- Average seed if in the field
- 3.8
- A 1 seed
- 11%
- Makes the field89%
- Round of 3282%
- Sweet 1653%
- Elite Eight24%
- Final Four9%
- Title game3%
- Champion1%
Schedule and results
| Date | Opponent | Where | Win chance | Projected | Result | Pick |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mon 2 Nov | vs UNLVrank 122 | Neutral | 91% | 90-71 | W 100-68 | Right |
| Sun 8 Nov8 PM ET | vs Utah Staterank 283 | Home | 100% | 92-46 | — | |
| Tue 10 Nov10:30 PM ET | vs Charlestonrank 172 | Home | 99% | 87-52 | — |
Rooting guide
- No games this week
Early in the season other teams' results barely move a team's chances, so the list is mostly its own games; by February the bubble and conference races make other games matter.
Players
| Player | Games | Minutes | Points | Rebounds | Assists | Rating | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jazzy DavidsonG | 1 | 28.0 | 23.0 | 5.0 | 4.0 | +12.4 | +7.6 |
| Kennedy SmithG | 1 | 27.0 | 12.0 | 1.0 | 3.0 | +9.8 | +6.0 |
| JuJu WatkinsG | 1 | 25.0 | 21.0 | 5.0 | 2.0 | +2.5 | +2.2 |
| Saniyah HallG | 1 | 23.0 | 22.0 | 7.0 | 1.0 | +2.6 | +2.0 |
| Sara OkekeF | 1 | 23.0 | 0.0 | 2.0 | 1.0 | +2.4 | +1.9 |
| Sitaya FaganF | 1 | 17.0 | 11.0 | 0.0 | 3.0 | +2.6 | +1.5 |
| Ryann BennettG · transfer from UC Davis | 1 | 15.0 | 2.0 | 2.0 | 3.0 | +6.2 | +2.3 |
| Pania DavisC · transfer from Florida St | 1 | 15.0 | 4.0 | 4.0 | 0.0 | +7.2 | +2.6 |
| Laura WilliamsF | 1 | 14.0 | 3.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | +9.7 | +3.1 |
| Rian ForestierG | 1 | 8.0 | 2.0 | 4.0 | 0.0 | +7.2 | +1.4 |
| Brooklyn ShamblinG | 1 | 3.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | +7.1 | +0.5 |
| Alesia TalkouskayaG | 1 | 2.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | +3.0 | +0.2 |
Style and luck
Every teamThe Four Factors adjusted for opponents
| Offence | Defence | League | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ShootingEffective FG% · decides 44% of the margin | 48.3%rank 3 | 44.0%rank 89 | 44.7% |
| TurnoversTurnover rate · decides 27% of the margin | 23.3%rank 91 | 25.1%rank 42 | 23.8% |
| Offensive reboundsRebound rate · decides 20% of the margin | 34.9%rank 59 | 36.4%rank 353 | 33.5% |
| Free throwsFree throws per FG attempt · decides 9% of the margin | 20.0%rank 247 | 21.6%rank 301 | 20.5% |
Defence is what opponents managed. For turnovers a high defence figure is good; for the others, low is good.
Luck so far
- Wins against the pre-game chances
- 1.0 won, 0.9 expected (+0.1)
- Opponents' three-point shooting
- −3.9 points a game (they shot 35.0%, league 28.5%)
- Opponents' free throws
- −0.7 points a game
- Close games: by 5 or fewer, or overtime
- None yet
Opponents' three-point shooting repeats little from one half of a season to the other (correlation 0.17), and their free throws even less (0.22), so a team living off either is likely to come back toward average. Positive numbers mean the luck has helped.
Rating this season
- Preseason net rating
- +27.6
- Last season's net rating
- +29.9
- Last season's minutes returning
- 41%
- Transfers in, weighted by minutes
- +0.6
- Change since preseason
- +3.9
- Offence, points per 100 possessions
- 109.5 (rank 17)
- Defence, points allowed per 100
- 78.0 (rank 14)
- Tempo, possessions per 40 minutes
- 74.4 (rank 66)
- Schedule so far, opponents' average
- +1.8 (rank 107)
Big Ten Conference by rating
| # | Team | Record | Conference | Net | Offence | Defence | National rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Michigan | 0-0 | 0-0 | +43.9 | 115.9 | 72.0 | 3 |
| 2 | Ohio State | 1-0 | 0-0 | +38.9 | 112.2 | 73.3 | 5 |
| 3 | Minnesota | 1-0 | 0-0 | +35.9 | 114.4 | 78.6 | 7 |
| 4 | UCLA | 1-0 | 0-0 | +34.4 | 110.0 | 75.7 | 11 |
| 5 | Illinois | 1-0 | 0-0 | +33.4 | 112.2 | 78.9 | 13 |
| 6 | Iowa | 1-0 | 0-0 | +31.9 | 109.9 | 78.0 | 14 |
| 7 | USC | 1-0 | 0-0 | +31.5 | 109.5 | 78.0 | 15 |
| 8 | Oregon | 1-0 | 0-0 | +29.4 | 107.3 | 77.9 | 20 |
| 9 | Maryland | 0-1 | 0-0 | +28.8 | 112.2 | 83.3 | 21 |
| 10 | Washington | 1-0 | 0-0 | +26.6 | 105.6 | 79.0 | 24 |
| 11 | Michigan State | 1-0 | 0-0 | +23.9 | 104.3 | 80.5 | 28 |
| 12 | Nebraska | 1-0 | 0-0 | +23.3 | 105.1 | 81.8 | 30 |
| 13 | Indiana | 1-0 | 0-0 | +18.4 | 102.1 | 83.8 | 41 |
| 14 | Wisconsin | 1-0 | 0-0 | +12.8 | 102.5 | 89.6 | 67 |
| 15 | Rutgers | 2-0 | 0-0 | +9.0 | 96.2 | 87.1 | 83 |
| 16 | Purdue | 1-0 | 0-0 | +5.7 | 97.0 | 91.4 | 97 |
| 17 | Northwestern | 1-0 | 0-0 | +4.3 | 95.0 | 90.7 | 103 |
| 18 | Penn State | 0-1 | 0-0 | +0.9 | 93.0 | 92.1 | 131 |