Rutgers Scarlet Knights
Next: vs Indiana St · Sun 8 Nov, 2 PM ETProjected 84-58 · Game page
Makes the tournament4%From 20,000 simulated seasons · average seed 9.7
Wins the national title0%Final Four 0% · projected 16-17
Net rating+9.0Rank 83 of 363 · offence 86, defence 79
Season outlook
- Projected record
- 16-17 (12 to 19 wins)
- Projected conference record
- 4-14
- Wins or shares the conference title
- 0%
- Wins the conference tournament
- 0%
- Average seed if in the field
- 9.7
- A 1 seed
- 0%
- Makes the field4%
- Round of 321%
- Sweet 16<1%
- Elite Eight<1%
- Final Four0%
- Title game0%
- Champion0%
Schedule and results
| Date | Opponent | Where | Win chance | Projected | Result | Pick |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mon 2 Nov | vs Long Island Universityrank 346 | Home | 97% | 92-66 | W 83-52 | Right |
| Wed 4 Nov | vs La Sallerank 168 | Home | 91% | 75-57 | W 75-62 | Right |
| Sun 8 Nov2 PM ET | vs Indiana Staterank 290 | Home | 98% | 84-58 | — | |
| Wed 11 Nov7 PM ET | vs Monmouthrank 153 | Home | 85% | 70-57 | — |
Rooting guide
- Sun 8 Nov: vs Indiana StateA win: 4% · a loss: 4%0 pts
- Wed 11 Nov: vs MonmouthA win: 4% · a loss: 4%0 pts
Early in the season other teams' results barely move a team's chances, so the list is mostly its own games; by February the bubble and conference races make other games matter.
Players
| Player | Games | Minutes | Points | Rebounds | Assists | Rating | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mia PauldoG · transfer from Tennessee | 2 | 30.0 | 21.5 | 5.0 | 5.5 | +4.2 | +3.5 |
| Zachara PerkinsG | 2 | 27.5 | 10.0 | 8.5 | 1.0 | +0.2 | +1.2 |
| Tara DayeG · transfer from Purdue | 2 | 25.0 | 7.5 | 8.0 | 3.5 | +3.9 | +2.7 |
| Chikae DesdunesG | 2 | 23.5 | 8.0 | 0.5 | 2.0 | −2.2 | 0.0 |
| Jaylah LampleyG · transfer from Mississippi St | 2 | 23.0 | 10.0 | 4.5 | 0.5 | +3.3 | +2.3 |
| Imani LesterF | 2 | 19.0 | 7.5 | 4.5 | 0.0 | +2.8 | +1.7 |
| Mya PauldoG · transfer from Tennessee | 2 | 17.0 | 4.5 | 3.0 | 1.5 | +2.5 | +1.4 |
| Zennia ThomasF · transfer from Howard | 2 | 14.0 | 8.0 | 4.0 | 0.5 | +3.5 | +1.4 |
| Natassja KolffF | 2 | 11.0 | 0.5 | 1.5 | 0.0 | −1.7 | +0.1 |
| Lauryn SwannG | 2 | 5.5 | 0.5 | 0.0 | 0.0 | −1.0 | +0.1 |
| Kennedy BrandtG | 1 | 3.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | −1.4 | 0.0 |
| Hope MasoniusG · transfer from Bucknell | 1 | 2.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | −3.8 | −0.1 |
| Deja YoungG | 1 | 2.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | −1.1 | 0.0 |
| Precious Gem WheelerF | 1 | 2.0 | 2.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | −2.6 | 0.0 |
Style and luck
Every teamThe Four Factors adjusted for opponents
| Offence | Defence | League | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ShootingEffective FG% · decides 44% of the margin | 42.9%rank 337 | 45.7%rank 295 | 44.7% |
| TurnoversTurnover rate · decides 27% of the margin | 23.1%rank 76 | 25.7%rank 20 | 23.8% |
| Offensive reboundsRebound rate · decides 20% of the margin | 35.9%rank 22 | 35.1%rank 315 | 33.5% |
| Free throwsFree throws per FG attempt · decides 9% of the margin | 19.9%rank 249 | 22.6%rank 333 | 20.5% |
Defence is what opponents managed. For turnovers a high defence figure is good; for the others, low is good.
Luck so far
- Wins against the pre-game chances
- 2.0 won, 1.9 expected (+0.1)
- Opponents' three-point shooting
- −2.0 points a game (they shot 31.7%, league 28.5%)
- Opponents' free throws
- +5.8 points a game
- Close games: by 5 or fewer, or overtime
- None yet
Opponents' three-point shooting repeats little from one half of a season to the other (correlation 0.17), and their free throws even less (0.22), so a team living off either is likely to come back toward average. Positive numbers mean the luck has helped.
Rating this season
- Preseason net rating
- +6.7
- Last season's net rating
- −1.0
- Last season's minutes returning
- 36%
- Transfers in, weighted by minutes
- +7.8
- Change since preseason
- +2.4
- Offence, points per 100 possessions
- 96.2 (rank 86)
- Defence, points allowed per 100
- 87.1 (rank 79)
- Tempo, possessions per 40 minutes
- 73.0 (rank 196)
- Schedule so far, opponents' average
- −13.8 (rank 209)
Big Ten Conference by rating
| # | Team | Record | Conference | Net | Offence | Defence | National rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Michigan | 0-0 | 0-0 | +43.9 | 115.9 | 72.0 | 3 |
| 2 | Ohio State | 1-0 | 0-0 | +38.9 | 112.2 | 73.3 | 5 |
| 3 | Minnesota | 1-0 | 0-0 | +35.9 | 114.4 | 78.6 | 7 |
| 4 | UCLA | 1-0 | 0-0 | +34.4 | 110.0 | 75.7 | 11 |
| 5 | Illinois | 1-0 | 0-0 | +33.4 | 112.2 | 78.9 | 13 |
| 6 | Iowa | 1-0 | 0-0 | +31.9 | 109.9 | 78.0 | 14 |
| 7 | USC | 1-0 | 0-0 | +31.5 | 109.5 | 78.0 | 15 |
| 8 | Oregon | 1-0 | 0-0 | +29.4 | 107.3 | 77.9 | 20 |
| 9 | Maryland | 0-1 | 0-0 | +28.8 | 112.2 | 83.3 | 21 |
| 10 | Washington | 1-0 | 0-0 | +26.6 | 105.6 | 79.0 | 24 |
| 11 | Michigan State | 1-0 | 0-0 | +23.9 | 104.3 | 80.5 | 28 |
| 12 | Nebraska | 1-0 | 0-0 | +23.3 | 105.1 | 81.8 | 30 |
| 13 | Indiana | 1-0 | 0-0 | +18.4 | 102.1 | 83.8 | 41 |
| 14 | Wisconsin | 1-0 | 0-0 | +12.8 | 102.5 | 89.6 | 67 |
| 15 | Rutgers | 2-0 | 0-0 | +9.0 | 96.2 | 87.1 | 83 |
| 16 | Purdue | 1-0 | 0-0 | +5.7 | 97.0 | 91.4 | 97 |
| 17 | Northwestern | 1-0 | 0-0 | +4.3 | 95.0 | 90.7 | 103 |
| 18 | Penn State | 0-1 | 0-0 | +0.9 | 93.0 | 92.1 | 131 |