UCLA Bruins
Makes the tournament94%From 20,000 simulated seasons · average seed 3.0
Wins the national title2%Final Four 15% · projected 24-9
Net rating+34.4Rank 11 of 363 · offence 14, defence 7
Season outlook
- Projected record
- 24-9 (18 to 29 wins)
- Projected conference record
- 13-5
- Wins or shares the conference title
- 12%
- Wins the conference tournament
- 8%
- Average seed if in the field
- 3.0
- A 1 seed
- 24%
- Makes the field94%
- Round of 3290%
- Sweet 1668%
- Elite Eight35%
- Final Four15%
- Title game6%
- Champion2%
Schedule and results
Rooting guide
- Thu 5 Nov: vs UC IrvineA win: 94% · a loss: 90%+4 pts
- Thu 12 Nov: vs ArizonaA win: 94% · a loss: 91%+3 pts
Early in the season other teams' results barely move a team's chances, so the list is mostly its own games; by February the bubble and conference races make other games matter.
Players
| Player | Games | Minutes | Points | Rebounds | Assists | Rating | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Donovyn HunterG · transfer from TCU | 1 | 30.0 | 14.0 | 3.0 | 4.0 | +8.0 | +5.5 |
| Elina AarnisaloG · transfer from North Carolina | 1 | 29.0 | 9.0 | 3.0 | 4.0 | +8.9 | +5.8 |
| Addy BrownF · transfer from Iowa State | 1 | 24.0 | 9.0 | 6.0 | 3.0 | +9.4 | +5.0 |
| Sienna BettsF | 1 | 24.0 | 15.0 | 7.0 | 1.0 | +11.2 | +5.8 |
| KK BransfordG · transfer from Notre Dame | 1 | 22.0 | 10.0 | 2.0 | 0.0 | +6.6 | +3.5 |
| Timea GardinerF | 1 | 21.0 | 6.0 | 5.0 | 2.0 | +1.3 | +1.3 |
| Somto OkaforG | 1 | 18.0 | 3.0 | 1.0 | 3.0 | +1.4 | +1.1 |
| Bonnie DeasG · transfer from Arkansas | 1 | 13.0 | 3.0 | 3.0 | 1.0 | +5.7 | +1.8 |
| Amanda MuseF | 1 | 11.0 | 4.0 | 4.0 | 1.0 | +8.7 | +2.2 |
| Lina JerkovicG | 1 | 8.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | +1.6 | +0.6 |
Style and luck
Every teamThe Four Factors adjusted for opponents
| Offence | Defence | League | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ShootingEffective FG% · decides 44% of the margin | 45.2%rank 97 | 45.7%rank 297 | 44.7% |
| TurnoversTurnover rate · decides 27% of the margin | 23.9%rank 252 | 24.1%rank 100 | 23.8% |
| Offensive reboundsRebound rate · decides 20% of the margin | 33.6%rank 132 | 30.9%rank 16 | 33.5% |
| Free throwsFree throws per FG attempt · decides 9% of the margin | 18.3%rank 346 | 20.4%rank 133 | 20.5% |
Defence is what opponents managed. For turnovers a high defence figure is good; for the others, low is good.
Luck so far
- Wins against the pre-game chances
- 1.0 won, 1.0 expected (0.0)
- Opponents' three-point shooting
- −7.3 points a game (they shot 39.1%, league 28.5%)
- Opponents' free throws
- +0.1 points a game
- Close games: by 5 or fewer, or overtime
- None yet
Opponents' three-point shooting repeats little from one half of a season to the other (correlation 0.17), and their free throws even less (0.22), so a team living off either is likely to come back toward average. Positive numbers mean the luck has helped.
Rating this season
- Preseason net rating
- +35.8
- Last season's net rating
- +58.2
- Last season's minutes returning
- 15%
- Transfers in, weighted by minutes
- +17.0
- Change since preseason
- −1.4
- Offence, points per 100 possessions
- 110.0 (rank 14)
- Defence, points allowed per 100
- 75.7 (rank 7)
- Tempo, possessions per 40 minutes
- 72.3 (rank 278)
- Schedule so far, opponents' average
- +1.8 (rank 106)
Big Ten Conference by rating
| # | Team | Record | Conference | Net | Offence | Defence | National rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Michigan | 0-0 | 0-0 | +43.9 | 115.9 | 72.0 | 3 |
| 2 | Ohio State | 1-0 | 0-0 | +38.9 | 112.2 | 73.3 | 5 |
| 3 | Minnesota | 1-0 | 0-0 | +35.9 | 114.4 | 78.6 | 7 |
| 4 | UCLA | 1-0 | 0-0 | +34.4 | 110.0 | 75.7 | 11 |
| 5 | Illinois | 1-0 | 0-0 | +33.4 | 112.2 | 78.9 | 13 |
| 6 | Iowa | 1-0 | 0-0 | +31.9 | 109.9 | 78.0 | 14 |
| 7 | USC | 1-0 | 0-0 | +31.5 | 109.5 | 78.0 | 15 |
| 8 | Oregon | 1-0 | 0-0 | +29.4 | 107.3 | 77.9 | 20 |
| 9 | Maryland | 0-1 | 0-0 | +28.8 | 112.2 | 83.3 | 21 |
| 10 | Washington | 1-0 | 0-0 | +26.6 | 105.6 | 79.0 | 24 |
| 11 | Michigan State | 1-0 | 0-0 | +23.9 | 104.3 | 80.5 | 28 |
| 12 | Nebraska | 1-0 | 0-0 | +23.3 | 105.1 | 81.8 | 30 |
| 13 | Indiana | 1-0 | 0-0 | +18.4 | 102.1 | 83.8 | 41 |
| 14 | Wisconsin | 1-0 | 0-0 | +12.8 | 102.5 | 89.6 | 67 |
| 15 | Rutgers | 2-0 | 0-0 | +9.0 | 96.2 | 87.1 | 83 |
| 16 | Purdue | 1-0 | 0-0 | +5.7 | 97.0 | 91.4 | 97 |
| 17 | Northwestern | 1-0 | 0-0 | +4.3 | 95.0 | 90.7 | 103 |
| 18 | Penn State | 0-1 | 0-0 | +0.9 | 93.0 | 92.1 | 131 |