Wisconsin Badgers
Makes the tournament8%From 20,000 simulated seasons · average seed 9.0
Wins the national title0%Final Four 0% · projected 15-16
Net rating+12.9Rank 67 of 363 · offence 42, defence 115
Season outlook
- Projected record
- 15-16 (12 to 19 wins)
- Projected conference record
- 4-14
- Wins or shares the conference title
- 0%
- Wins the conference tournament
- <1%
- Average seed if in the field
- 9.0
- A 1 seed
- 0%
- Makes the field8%
- Round of 324%
- Sweet 16<1%
- Elite Eight<1%
- Final Four0%
- Title game0%
- Champion0%
Schedule and results
Rooting guide
- Thu 5 Nov: vs OaklandA win: 8% · a loss: 9%−1 pts
- Sun 8 Nov: vs GramblingA win: 8% · a loss: 8%0 pts
- Wed 11 Nov: vs DelawareA win: 8% · a loss: 8%0 pts
Early in the season other teams' results barely move a team's chances, so the list is mostly its own games; by February the bubble and conference races make other games matter.
Players
| Player | Games | Minutes | Points | Rebounds | Assists | Rating | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Addie DealG · transfer from Iowa | 1 | 38.0 | 15.0 | 4.0 | 3.0 | +4.7 | +4.7 |
| Teagan MallegniG · transfer from Iowa | 1 | 31.0 | 17.0 | 6.0 | 4.0 | +4.4 | +3.7 |
| Alicia CourthiauG | 1 | 27.0 | 6.0 | 3.0 | 2.0 | +0.3 | +1.2 |
| Adaline ShepleeG | 1 | 25.0 | 16.0 | 3.0 | 0.0 | +0.3 | +1.1 |
| Caia RoseG · transfer from Chattanooga | 1 | 24.0 | 2.0 | 1.0 | 3.0 | +3.6 | +2.5 |
| Laci SteeleG | 1 | 20.0 | 6.0 | 4.0 | 3.0 | +3.4 | +2.0 |
| Nikki KersteinPG | 1 | 17.0 | 6.0 | 6.0 | 0.0 | +1.0 | +1.0 |
| Giselle JanowskiG | 1 | 10.0 | 3.0 | 2.0 | 0.0 | +0.7 | +0.5 |
| Leah NordinG | 1 | 8.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | +0.8 | +0.4 |
Style and luck
Every teamThe Four Factors adjusted for opponents
| Offence | Defence | League | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ShootingEffective FG% · decides 44% of the margin | 44.2%rank 262 | 46.6%rank 335 | 44.7% |
| TurnoversTurnover rate · decides 27% of the margin | 22.3%rank 30 | 24.1%rank 102 | 23.8% |
| Offensive reboundsRebound rate · decides 20% of the margin | 32.0%rank 312 | 34.0%rank 258 | 33.5% |
| Free throwsFree throws per FG attempt · decides 9% of the margin | 18.0%rank 354 | 18.7%rank 41 | 20.5% |
Defence is what opponents managed. For turnovers a high defence figure is good; for the others, low is good.
Luck so far
- Wins against the pre-game chances
- 1.0 won, 0.9 expected (+0.1)
- Opponents' three-point shooting
- −2.3 points a game (they shot 31.0%, league 28.4%)
- Opponents' free throws
- −0.6 points a game
- Close games: by 5 or fewer, or overtime
- None yet
Opponents' three-point shooting repeats little from one half of a season to the other (correlation 0.17), and their free throws even less (0.22), so a team living off either is likely to come back toward average. Positive numbers mean the luck has helped.
Rating this season
- Preseason net rating
- +14.1
- Last season's net rating
- +10.9
- Last season's minutes returning
- 43%
- Transfers in, weighted by minutes
- +0.2
- Change since preseason
- −1.3
- Offence, points per 100 possessions
- 102.4 (rank 42)
- Defence, points allowed per 100
- 89.5 (rank 115)
- Tempo, possessions per 40 minutes
- 72.7 (rank 235)
- Schedule so far, opponents' average
- −2.2 (rank 142)
Big Ten Conference by rating
| # | Team | Record | Conference | Net | Offence | Defence | National rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Michigan | 0-0 | 0-0 | +43.9 | 115.8 | 71.9 | 3 |
| 2 | Ohio State | 1-0 | 0-0 | +38.9 | 112.1 | 73.2 | 5 |
| 3 | Minnesota | 1-0 | 0-0 | +35.9 | 114.4 | 78.5 | 7 |
| 4 | UCLA | 1-0 | 0-0 | +34.4 | 110.0 | 75.6 | 11 |
| 5 | Illinois | 1-0 | 0-0 | +33.4 | 112.2 | 78.8 | 13 |
| 6 | Iowa | 1-0 | 0-0 | +32.0 | 109.9 | 77.9 | 14 |
| 7 | USC | 1-0 | 0-0 | +31.5 | 109.4 | 77.9 | 15 |
| 8 | Oregon | 1-0 | 0-0 | +29.4 | 107.2 | 77.9 | 20 |
| 9 | Maryland | 0-1 | 0-0 | +28.8 | 112.1 | 83.2 | 21 |
| 10 | Washington | 1-0 | 0-0 | +26.6 | 105.5 | 78.9 | 24 |
| 11 | Michigan State | 1-0 | 0-0 | +23.9 | 104.3 | 80.4 | 28 |
| 12 | Nebraska | 1-0 | 0-0 | +23.3 | 105.0 | 81.8 | 30 |
| 13 | Indiana | 1-0 | 0-0 | +18.4 | 102.1 | 83.7 | 41 |
| 14 | Wisconsin | 1-0 | 0-0 | +12.9 | 102.4 | 89.5 | 67 |
| 15 | Rutgers | 2-0 | 0-0 | +9.1 | 96.1 | 87.1 | 83 |
| 16 | Purdue | 1-0 | 0-0 | +5.7 | 97.0 | 91.3 | 97 |
| 17 | Northwestern | 1-0 | 0-0 | +4.3 | 94.9 | 90.6 | 103 |
| 18 | Penn State | 0-1 | 0-0 | +0.9 | 92.9 | 92.0 | 132 |