Who will win Rider vs FDU?
The model gives Fairleigh Dickinson a 91% chance to beat Rider, with a projected score of FDU 68, Rider 52.
Half of games like thisFour in five
Calls of 90–100% have been right 96.1% of the time in 10,929 past games, and the typical miss on the margin is 9.5 points. After the final, the result is pinned to this strip. As of 2:23 AM ET on November 13, 2026. Updated three times a day until tip-off.
Players to watch
| Player | Pts | Reb | Ast | Last games | Chance of |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DowneyG · 30 min | 12.3 | 2.5 | 1.2 | 10+ 64% | |
| CrosbyF · 30 min | 11.0 | 7.9 | 1.9 | 10+ 55% | |
| Osei-OwusuF · 28 min | 8.6 | 7.3 | 2.0 | 10+ 38% | |
| ValleG · 24 min | 7.9 | 4.6 | 1.3 | 10+ 33% | |
| HoddinottG · 33 min | 10.6 | 2.8 | 1.9 | 10+ 52% | |
| McIverG · 33 min | 7.9 | 5.2 | 2.2 | 10+ 32% | |
| SweeneyF · 32 min | 5.9 | 6.9 | 2.4 | 5+ 55% | |
| Perez MesquidaG · 27 min | 5.3 | 2.9 | 1.5 | 5+ 49% | |
Bars: points in the player's latest games this season. Blue line: tonight's projection. Every regular's line
The game without one player
Without Rebecca Osei-Owusu: Rider 12%FDU 88%
The white mark is the call with her: FDU 91%.
| Player | Points a game she adds | FDU without her | Change | Projected score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rebecca Osei-Owusu | 1.8 | 88% | −3 | 53–68 |
| Leah Crosby | 1.6 | 89% | −2 | 53–68 |
| Reese Downey | 0.6 | 90% | −1 | 52–68 |
Change is in FDU's win chance, in points. Scores read Rider, then FDU. A player's value is what the team is better by with her than with a replacement, from the player ratings.
Model against the line
Your call
All of today's gamesPlay-by-play
Team numbers
Form
Rider 1-1LW
- Nov 12W 56-45at C Connecticut
- Nov 2L 45-50at NJIT
- Last 2
- 1–1, scoring 50.5 and allowing 47.5
The spread and the total are the lines logged with each prediction. Form is what happened; the ratings above already count recent games more.
Offense against defense
| Rider | FDU | |
|---|---|---|
| Points scored per 100 possessions | 77.0 341st | 93.7 131st |
| Points allowed per 100 | 96.7 232nd | 96.2 223rd |
| Possessions a game | 70.1 334th | 69.4 357th |
| Shooting (effective field-goal %) | 43.3% 304th | 46.8% 107th |
| Opponents' shooting | 42.5% 26th | 46.3% 232nd |
| Turnovers, share of possessions | 22.2% 80th | 22.0% 66th |
| Offensive rebounds, share of misses | 33.2% 155th | 32.8% 176th |
| Free throws per shot | 0.22 94th | 0.19 318th |
The widest gap: FDU's defense (223rd) against Rider's offense (341st), of 363 teams.
First half
- Projected halftime score
- Rider 24, FDU 33
- First-half margin
- FDU by 9.6
- First-half points, both teams
- 57.0
- Projected second half
- Rider 28, FDU 35
- Second-half points, both teams
- 63.2
- Tied at the half
- 4%
- Rider, first halves so far
- Led 1 of 2 · 25.5 scored, 23.0 allowed
- FDU, first halves so far
- Led 2 of 4 · 32.5 scored, 33.8 allowed
Our own projection, not a sportsbook's first-half line. On 10,911 past games it had not seen, the halftime leader was right 73.0% of the time and the first-half total was off by 8.0 points on average. This season: 404 of 492 halftime leaders right. Scorecard
Player projections
Rider
| Player | Min | Pts | Reb | Ast | 3s |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aliya McIverG | 33 | 7.9 | 5.2 | 2.2 | 0.7 |
| 10+ pts 32% · 5+ reb 56% · 1+ threes 47% | |||||
| Giana HoddinottG | 33 | 10.6 | 2.8 | 1.9 | 1.1 |
| 10+ pts 52% · 3+ reb 48% · 2+ ast 53% | |||||
| Gabby SweeneyF | 32 | 5.9 | 6.9 | 2.4 | 1.1 |
| 5+ pts 55% · 7+ reb 50% · 3+ ast 43% | |||||
| Aina Perez MesquidaG | 27 | 5.3 | 2.9 | 1.5 | 0.3 |
| 5+ pts 49% · 3+ reb 51% · 2+ ast 41% | |||||
| Julia KarpellG | 25 | 3.9 | 1.2 | 0.6 | 1.0 |
| 5+ pts 35% · 2+ reb 32% · 1+ threes 57% | |||||
| Ainsley GibsonG | 20 | 3.5 | 2.1 | 0.8 | 0.4 |
| 5+ pts 30% · 2+ reb 57% · 1+ threes 32% | |||||
| Alena CofieldG | 19 | 5.1 | 2.6 | 0.8 | 0.4 |
| 5+ pts 47% · 3+ reb 45% · 1+ threes 30% | |||||
FDU
| Player | Min | Pts | Reb | Ast | 3s |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reese DowneyG | 30 | 12.3 | 2.5 | 1.2 | 2.6 |
| 10+ pts 64% · 3+ reb 43% · 3+ threes 44% | |||||
| Leah CrosbyF | 30 | 11.0 | 7.9 | 1.9 | 0.6 |
| 10+ pts 55% · 8+ reb 50% · 2+ ast 55% | |||||
| Rebecca Osei-OwusuF | 28 | 8.6 | 7.3 | 2.0 | 0.0 |
| 10+ pts 38% · 7+ reb 55% · 2+ ast 55% | |||||
| Ane ValleG | 24 | 7.9 | 4.6 | 1.3 | 0.7 |
| 10+ pts 33% · 5+ reb 47% · 1+ threes 45% | |||||
| Theresa BiladiG | 23 | 7.5 | 3.0 | 1.3 | 0.7 |
| 5+ pts 69% · 3+ reb 53% · 1+ threes 45% | |||||
| Ophir WeintraubG | 20 | 5.1 | 2.6 | 2.2 | 0.3 |
| 5+ pts 47% · 3+ reb 44% · 2+ ast 61% | |||||
| Iriona GravleyF | 16 | 6.1 | 2.9 | 0.4 | 0.1 |
| 5+ pts 58% · 3+ reb 51% | |||||
| Ally KaminskiG | 14 | 3.9 | 1.6 | 0.8 | 0.6 |
| 5+ pts 34% · 2+ reb 45% · 1+ threes 42% | |||||
Our own projections from each player's minutes and production, this opponent and the game's pace: not a sportsbook's lines. Under each name, the round numbers the player is about as likely as not to reach. How they have done
Win probability
Game chat
Loading the chat…