Seton Hall at Auburn
Women's · Tuesday, November 17, 2026, 7:00 PM ET at Neville Arena. Seton Hall our rank 76 · 2-1; Auburn our rank 79 · 3-0.
Who will win Seton Hall vs Auburn?
The model gives Auburn a 63% chance to beat Seton Hall, with a projected score of Auburn 62, Seton Hall 58.
Half of games like thisFour in five
Calls of 60–70% have been right 64.3% of the time in 7,507 past games, and the typical miss on the margin is 9.5 points. After the final, the result is pinned to this strip. As of 2:23 AM ET on November 13, 2026. Updated three times a day until tip-off.
Players to watch
| Player | Pts | Reb | Ast | Last games | Chance of |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Auburn | |||||
| PetersonF · 24 min | 7.9 | 7.6 | 0.6 | 10+ 33% | |
| HarrisG · 26 min | 7.8 | 2.6 | 1.8 | 10+ 32% | |
| OshoF · 26 min | 7.7 | 5.2 | 1.1 | 10+ 31% | |
| StotijnG · 24 min | 6.3 | 2.2 | 1.4 | 5+ 59% | |
| Seton Hall | |||||
| CatalonG · 34 min | 14.5 | 3.9 | 1.9 | 15+ 46% | |
| CraftG · 30 min | 10.0 | 5.9 | 0.5 | 10+ 48% | |
| ScepanovicF · 28 min | 8.4 | 5.6 | 1.9 | 10+ 36% | |
| WoodardG · 24 min | 6.6 | 2.0 | 1.8 | 5+ 62% | |
Bars: points in the player's latest games this season. Blue line: tonight's projection. Every regular's line
The game without one player
Without Jessica Peterson: Seton Hall 45%Auburn 55%
The white mark is the call with her: Auburn 63%.
| Player | Points a game she adds | Auburn without her | Change | Projected score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Auburn | ||||
| Jessica Peterson | 2.3 | 55% | −8 | 59–61 |
| Ja'Mia Harris | 2.0 | 56% | −7 | 59–61 |
| Danielle Osho | 1.8 | 57% | −6 | 59–61 |
| Quanirah Montague | 1.6 | 58% | −5 | 59–61 |
| Seton Hall | ||||
| Savannah Catalon | 4.5 | 75% | +12 | 56–64 |
| Ja'Kahla Craft | 3.5 | 73% | +10 | 56–64 |
| Ari Woodard | 1.8 | 68% | +5 | 57–63 |
| Saniyah King | 1.2 | 66% | +3 | 58–63 |
Change is in Auburn's win chance, in points. Scores read Seton Hall, then Auburn. A player's value is what the team is better by with her than with a replacement, from the player ratings.
Model against the line
Your call
All of today's gamesPlay-by-play
Team numbers
Form
Seton Hall 2-1WWL
- Nov 12L 67-69vs Fairfield
- Nov 6W 74-56vs Indiana St
- Nov 3W 63-37vs Mercyhurst
- Last 3
- 2–1, scoring 68.0 and allowing 54.0
Auburn 3-0WWW
- Nov 10W 74-56vs Furman
- Nov 5W 56-48vs Southern Miss
- Nov 2W 84-35vs Alabama St
- Last 3
- 3–0, scoring 71.3 and allowing 46.3
The spread and the total are the lines logged with each prediction. Form is what happened; the ratings above already count recent games more.
Offense against defense
| Seton Hall | Auburn | |
|---|---|---|
| Points scored per 100 possessions | 95.4 110th | 93.8 130th |
| Points allowed per 100 | 84.2 54th | 83.0 45th |
| Possessions a game | 71.3 251st | 71.2 265th |
| Shooting (effective field-goal %) | 44.0% 279th | 44.5% 245th |
| Opponents' shooting | 43.4% 62nd | 40.1% 6th |
| Turnovers, share of possessions | 24.5% 260th | 25.7% 314th |
| Offensive rebounds, share of misses | 35.1% 78th | 35.1% 79th |
| Free throws per shot | 0.23 92nd | 0.28 4th |
The widest gap: Seton Hall's defense (54th) against Auburn's offense (130th), of 363 teams.
First half
- Projected halftime score
- Seton Hall 27, Auburn 30
- First-half margin
- Auburn by 2.3
- First-half points, both teams
- 57.0
- Projected second half
- Seton Hall 31, Auburn 32
- Second-half points, both teams
- 63.3
- Tied at the half
- 4%
- Seton Hall, first halves so far
- Led 2 of 3 · 33.3 scored, 27.0 allowed
- Auburn, first halves so far
- Led 3 of 3 · 34.0 scored, 22.0 allowed
Our own projection, not a sportsbook's first-half line. On 10,911 past games it had not seen, the halftime leader was right 73.0% of the time and the first-half total was off by 8.0 points on average. This season: 404 of 492 halftime leaders right. Scorecard
Player projections
Seton Hall
| Player | Min | Pts | Reb | Ast | 3s |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Savannah CatalonG | 34 | 14.5 | 3.9 | 1.9 | 1.2 |
| 15+ pts 46% · 4+ reb 51% · 2+ ast 55% | |||||
| Ja'Kahla CraftG | 30 | 10.0 | 5.9 | 0.5 | 1.0 |
| 10+ pts 48% · 6+ reb 51% · 1+ threes 57% | |||||
| Ksenija ScepanovicF | 28 | 8.4 | 5.6 | 1.9 | 0.7 |
| 10+ pts 36% · 6+ reb 46% · 2+ ast 53% | |||||
| Ari WoodardG | 24 | 6.6 | 2.0 | 1.8 | 0.5 |
| 5+ pts 62% · 2+ reb 53% · 2+ ast 51% | |||||
| Saniyah KingG | 20 | 2.1 | 1.9 | 1.7 | 0.3 |
| 5+ pts 16% · 2+ reb 51% · 2+ ast 49% | |||||
| Savanna JonesF | 18 | 3.2 | 2.8 | 0.7 | 0.0 |
| 5+ pts 27% · 3+ reb 50% · 2+ ast 16% | |||||
| Shamira MortonF | 13 | 3.3 | 2.7 | 0.3 | 0.1 |
| 5+ pts 28% · 3+ reb 47% | |||||
| Samari BankheadG | 12 | 3.4 | 1.6 | 0.4 | 0.4 |
| 5+ pts 29% · 2+ reb 44% · 1+ threes 33% | |||||
Auburn
| Player | Min | Pts | Reb | Ast | 3s |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Danielle OshoF | 26 | 7.7 | 5.2 | 1.1 | 0.8 |
| 10+ pts 31% · 5+ reb 55% · 1+ threes 50% | |||||
| Ja'Mia HarrisG | 26 | 7.8 | 2.6 | 1.8 | 0.7 |
| 10+ pts 32% · 2+ ast 51% · 1+ threes 49% | |||||
| Phoenix StotijnG | 24 | 6.3 | 2.2 | 1.4 | 0.6 |
| 5+ pts 59% · 2+ reb 58% · 1+ threes 41% | |||||
| Jessica PetersonF | 24 | 7.9 | 7.6 | 0.6 | 0.1 |
| 10+ pts 33% · 8+ reb 47% | |||||
| Sania RichardsonG | 21 | 4.3 | 2.5 | 2.1 | 0.4 |
| 5+ pts 39% · 3+ reb 44% · 2+ ast 60% | |||||
| Quanirah MontagueF | 17 | 4.6 | 4.3 | 0.5 | 0.2 |
| 5+ pts 43% · 4+ reb 58% · 1+ threes 21% | |||||
| Kaitlyn DuhonG | 16 | 5.6 | 2.6 | 0.6 | 0.3 |
| 5+ pts 52% · 3+ reb 45% · 1+ threes 27% | |||||
| Ashley KnoxG | 16 | 3.8 | 1.5 | 0.7 | 0.7 |
| 5+ pts 34% · 2+ reb 40% · 1+ threes 46% | |||||
Our own projections from each player's minutes and production, this opponent and the game's pace: not a sportsbook's lines. Under each name, the round numbers the player is about as likely as not to reach. How they have done
Win probability
Game chat
Loading the chat…