Grand Canyon v High Point
Women's · Monday, November 23, 2026, 3:00 PM ET at Viejas Arena. Grand Canyon our rank 116 · 2-0; High Point our rank 133 · 4-0.
Who will win Grand Canyon vs High Point?
The model gives Grand Canyon a 57% chance to beat High Point, with a projected score of Grand Canyon 68, High Point 66.
Half of games like thisFour in five
Calls of 50–60% have been right 55.7% of the time in 7,540 past games, and the typical miss on the margin is 9.5 points. After the final, the result is pinned to this strip. As of 2:23 AM ET on November 13, 2026. Updated three times a day until tip-off.
Players to watch
| Player | Pts | Reb | Ast | Last games | Chance of |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grand Canyon | |||||
| YiechF · 29 min | 13.4 | 7.3 | 1.4 | 15+ 39% | |
| FozG · 26 min | 10.9 | 3.3 | 2.5 | 10+ 55% | |
| SallmanC · 24 min | 10.9 | 7.5 | 1.5 | 10+ 55% | |
| MannG · 22 min | 10.3 | 2.3 | 2.1 | 10+ 51% | |
| High Point | |||||
| FeldmanG · 33 min | 15.1 | 4.4 | 3.8 | 15+ 50% | |
| WoodardF · 32 min | 11.4 | 7.8 | 1.9 | 10+ 58% | |
| TippnerG · 31 min | 10.6 | 6.6 | 1.9 | 10+ 53% | |
| GerdesF · 27 min | 9.3 | 4.6 | 1.3 | 10+ 43% | |
Bars: points in the player's latest games this season. Blue line: tonight's projection. Every regular's line
The game without one player
Without Nyadieng Yiech: Grand Canyon 49%High Point 51%
The white mark is the call with her: Grand Canyon 57%.
| Player | Points a game she adds | Grand Canyon without her | Change | Projected score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grand Canyon | ||||
| Nyadieng Yiech | 2.5 | 49% | −8 | 67–67 |
| Dasha Biriuk | 2.1 | 50% | −7 | 67–67 |
| T'yana Todd | 1.6 | 52% | −5 | 67–67 |
| Maya Foz | 1.3 | 53% | −4 | 67–67 |
| High Point | ||||
| Juliann Woodard | 2.7 | 65% | +8 | 69–65 |
| Meredith Tippner | 1.2 | 61% | +4 | 69–65 |
| Taylor Feldman | 1.2 | 60% | +3 | 69–65 |
| Peyton Gerdes | 1.1 | 60% | +3 | 69–65 |
Change is in Grand Canyon's win chance, in points. Scores read Grand Canyon, then High Point. A player's value is what the team is better by with her than with a replacement, from the player ratings.
Model against the line
Your call
All of today's gamesPlay-by-play
Team numbers
Form
Grand Canyon 2-0WW
- Nov 9W 81-74vs OregonCovered +9.5 · Over 137.5
- Nov 4W 77-55vs Jackson St
- Last 2
- 2–0, scoring 79.0 and allowing 64.5
- Against the spread, this season
- 1–0
- Totals, this season
- 1 over, 0 under
High Point 4-0WWWW
- Nov 11W 67-54at East Carolina
- Nov 7W 78-71at Ball State
- Nov 4W 75-46vs Wingate
- Nov 2W 88-39vs Lees McRae
- Last 4
- 4–0, scoring 77.0 and allowing 52.5
The spread and the total are the lines logged with each prediction. Form is what happened; the ratings above already count recent games more.
Offense against defense
| Grand Canyon | High Point | |
|---|---|---|
| Points scored per 100 possessions | 94.5 123rd | 91.6 156th |
| Points allowed per 100 | 90.6 117th | 90.3 113th |
| Possessions a game | 73.2 84th | 72.7 115th |
| Shooting (effective field-goal %) | 45.4% 180th | 46.7% 113th |
| Opponents' shooting | 44.4% 116th | 44.0% 88th |
| Turnovers, share of possessions | 23.2% 157th | 22.1% 72nd |
| Offensive rebounds, share of misses | 33.1% 163rd | 33.0% 168th |
| Free throws per shot | 0.26 9th | 0.20 263rd |
The widest gap: Grand Canyon's defense (117th) against High Point's offense (156th), of 363 teams.
First half
- Projected halftime score
- Grand Canyon 32, High Point 31
- First-half margin
- Grand Canyon by 1.2
- First-half points, both teams
- 63.5
- Projected second half
- Grand Canyon 36, High Point 35
- Second-half points, both teams
- 70.5
- Tied at the half
- 4%
- Grand Canyon, first halves so far
- Led 2 of 2 · 46.0 scored, 25.0 allowed
- High Point, first halves so far
- Led 4 of 4 · 38.0 scored, 22.5 allowed
Our own projection, not a sportsbook's first-half line. On 10,911 past games it had not seen, the halftime leader was right 73.0% of the time and the first-half total was off by 8.0 points on average. This season: 404 of 492 halftime leaders right. Scorecard
Player projections
Grand Canyon
| Player | Min | Pts | Reb | Ast | 3s |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dasha BiriukG | 29 | 9.9 | 3.9 | 1.5 | 1.4 |
| 10+ pts 48% · 4+ reb 51% · 2+ ast 43% | |||||
| Nyadieng YiechF | 29 | 13.4 | 7.3 | 1.4 | 0.9 |
| 15+ pts 39% · 7+ reb 55% · 1+ threes 55% | |||||
| T'yana ToddG | 26 | 9.9 | 2.2 | 1.4 | 1.0 |
| 10+ pts 48% · 2+ reb 59% · 1+ threes 57% | |||||
| Maya FozG | 26 | 10.9 | 3.3 | 2.5 | 0.7 |
| 10+ pts 55% · 3+ ast 43% · 1+ threes 46% | |||||
| Jana SallmanC | 24 | 10.9 | 7.5 | 1.5 | 0.0 |
| 10+ pts 55% · 8+ reb 46% · 2+ ast 41% | |||||
| Chloe MannG | 22 | 10.3 | 2.3 | 2.1 | 0.9 |
| 10+ pts 51% · 2+ ast 58% · 1+ threes 54% | |||||
| Ashlynn ChlarsonC | 13 | 3.7 | 3.3 | 0.3 | 0.1 |
| 5+ pts 32% · 3+ reb 59% | |||||
| Ines ZouniaG | 12 | 3.7 | 1.9 | 1.0 | 0.5 |
| 5+ pts 33% · 2+ reb 51% · 1+ threes 36% | |||||
High Point
| Player | Min | Pts | Reb | Ast | 3s |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Taylor FeldmanG | 33 | 15.1 | 4.4 | 3.8 | 1.1 |
| 15+ pts 50% · 5+ reb 43% · 4+ ast 52% | |||||
| Brecken SnotherlyG | 32 | 7.1 | 5.1 | 1.5 | 0.4 |
| 5+ pts 66% · 5+ reb 53% · 2+ ast 41% | |||||
| Juliann WoodardF | 32 | 11.4 | 7.8 | 1.9 | 1.4 |
| 10+ pts 58% · 8+ reb 49% · 2+ ast 54% | |||||
| Meredith TippnerG | 31 | 10.6 | 6.6 | 1.9 | 0.5 |
| 10+ pts 53% · 7+ reb 47% · 2+ ast 52% | |||||
| Peyton GerdesF | 27 | 9.3 | 4.6 | 1.3 | 0.9 |
| 10+ pts 43% · 5+ reb 46% · 1+ threes 53% | |||||
| Rylee BessG | 23 | 7.0 | 2.0 | 1.4 | 1.3 |
| 5+ pts 65% · 2+ reb 54% · 2+ ast 38% | |||||
| Khloe LemonG | 13 | 5.2 | 1.6 | 0.5 | 0.8 |
| 5+ pts 48% · 2+ reb 42% · 1+ threes 49% | |||||
Our own projections from each player's minutes and production, this opponent and the game's pace: not a sportsbook's lines. Under each name, the round numbers the player is about as likely as not to reach. How they have done
Win probability
Game chat
Loading the chat…