UL Monroe at Arizona St
Friday, November 13, 2026, 9:00 PM ET at Desert Financial Arena. UL Monroe our rank 298 · 1-3; Arizona St our rank 48 · 3-0.
Who will win UL Monroe vs Arizona St?
The model gives Arizona State a 99% chance to beat UL Monroe, with a projected score of Arizona St 92, UL Monroe 65. The spread is Arizona St −32.5, with an over/under of 150.5. The model makes it Arizona St by 26.4, 6.1 points toward UL Monroe, and projects 157 total points.
Half of games like thisFour in five
Calls of 90–100% have been right 95.4% of the time in 11,767 past games, and the typical miss on the margin is 8.8 points. After the final, the result is pinned to this strip. As of 2:23 AM ET on November 13, 2026. Updated three times a day until tip-off.
Players to watch
| Player | Pts | Reb | Ast | Last games | Chance of |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MurauskasF · 32 min | 23.3 | 8.1 | 2.7 | 25+ 41% | |
| FoxwellG · 30 min | 13.8 | 3.7 | 7.0 | 15+ 41% | |
| CroyG · 23 min | 11.4 | 3.0 | 1.7 | 10+ 58% | |
| DeftyC · 21 min | 9.6 | 5.1 | 1.7 | 10+ 45% | |
| AndersonG · 31 min | 12.8 | 4.8 | 1.7 | 15+ 35% | |
| McPhersonG · 25 min | 12.2 | 2.8 | 1.2 | 10+ 63% | |
| LondonG · 21 min | 9.4 | 2.2 | 1.3 | 10+ 44% | |
| TillmanG · 26 min | 8.2 | 2.3 | 1.8 | 10+ 35% | |
Bars: points in the player's latest games this season. Blue line: tonight's projection. Every regular's line
The game without one player
Without Paulius Murauskas: UL Monroe 3%Arizona St 97%
The white mark is the call with him: Arizona St 99%.
| Player | Points a game he adds | Arizona St without him | Change | Projected score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Paulius Murauskas | 5.6 | 97% | −2 | 68–89 |
| Dillan Shaw | 3.5 | 98% | −1 | 67–90 |
| Joel Foxwell | 2.6 | 98% | −1 | 66–90 |
| Ben Defty | 1.9 | 99% | 0 | 66–91 |
Change is in Arizona St's win chance, in points. Scores read UL Monroe, then Arizona St. A player's value is what the team is better by with him than with a replacement, from the player ratings.
Model against the line
| Spread | Over/under | |
|---|---|---|
| Line | Arizona St −32.5 | 150.5 |
| Model | Arizona St −26.4 | 156.6 |
| Gap | 6.1 toward UL Monroe | 6.1 higher |
A gap is a difference of opinion, not a tip. When the model and the line have been 4 or more points apart, the model's side has covered 48.4% of 702 games. This season the model's side has covered 163 of 337 spreads (48%); over 11,507 games in the last two seasons it covered 50.6%. It takes about 52.4% to break even at standard odds. Scorecard
Your call
All of today's gamesPlay-by-play
Team numbers
Form
UL Monroe 1-3LWLL
- Nov 10L 92-100at TCUCovered +33.5 · Over 160.5
- Nov 9L 67-108at Texas A&MDidn't cover +36.5 · Over 169.5
- Nov 4W 99-55vs Champion Christian
- Nov 2L 78-83vs C Michigan
- Last 4
- 1–3, scoring 84.0 and allowing 86.5
- Against the spread, this season
- 1–1
- Totals, this season
- 2 over, 0 under
Arizona St 3-0WWW
- Nov 10W 85-63vs HofstraCovered −18.5 · Over 133.5
- Nov 6W 90-63vs N ColoradoCovered −19.5 · Over 143.5
- Nov 2W 75-65vs ETSU
- Last 3
- 3–0, scoring 83.3 and allowing 63.7
- Against the spread, this season
- 2–0
- Totals, this season
- 2 over, 0 under
The spread and the total are the lines logged with each prediction. Form is what happened; the ratings above already count recent games more.
Offense against defense
| UL Monroe | Arizona St | |
|---|---|---|
| Points scored per 100 possessions | 100.3 264th | 116.0 40th |
| Points allowed per 100 | 113.7 319th | 99.8 54th |
| Possessions a game | 72.3 49th | 70.6 209th |
| Shooting (effective field-goal %) | 50.9% 149th | 51.9% 88th |
| Opponents' shooting | 50.3% 166th | 50.9% 214th |
| Turnovers, share of possessions | 19.4% 311th | 17.5% 114th |
| Offensive rebounds, share of misses | 34.1% 55th | 34.8% 27th |
| Free throws per shot | 0.25 242nd | 0.26 154th |
The widest gap: Arizona St's offense (40th) against UL Monroe's defense (319th), of 365 teams.
First half
- Projected halftime score
- UL Monroe 29, Arizona St 44
- First-half margin
- Arizona St by 14.5
- First-half points, both teams
- 73.5
- Projected second half
- UL Monroe 36, Arizona St 48
- Second-half points, both teams
- 83.1
- Tied at the half
- 4%
- UL Monroe, first halves so far
- Led 2 of 4 · 39.8 scored, 38.0 allowed
- Arizona St, first halves so far
- Led 3 of 3 · 42.0 scored, 29.7 allowed
Our own projection, not a sportsbook's first-half line. On 11,516 past games it had not seen, the halftime leader was right 67.2% of the time and the first-half total was off by 8.1 points on average. This season: 366 of 476 halftime leaders right. Scorecard
Player projections
UL Monroe
| Player | Min | Pts | Reb | Ast | 3s |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dayjaun AndersonG | 31 | 12.8 | 4.8 | 1.7 | 2.4 |
| 15+ pts 35% · 5+ reb 50% · 2+ ast 49% | |||||
| Lance CarrF | 26 | 5.9 | 5.6 | 0.7 | 0.1 |
| 5+ pts 55% · 6+ reb 47% · 2+ ast 16% | |||||
| Phillip TillmanG | 26 | 8.2 | 2.3 | 1.8 | 0.7 |
| 10+ pts 35% · 2+ ast 52% · 1+ threes 46% | |||||
| Quaran McPhersonG | 25 | 12.2 | 2.8 | 1.2 | 1.4 |
| 10+ pts 63% · 3+ reb 49% · 2+ threes 39% | |||||
| Khalil LondonG | 21 | 9.4 | 2.2 | 1.3 | 1.2 |
| 10+ pts 44% · 2+ reb 59% · 2+ ast 37% | |||||
| Ziyade NdanckyC | 19 | 6.9 | 4.7 | 0.5 | 0.3 |
| 5+ pts 64% · 5+ reb 48% · 1+ threes 26% | |||||
| Mike WhiteG | 18 | 3.6 | 2.4 | 1.7 | 0.6 |
| 5+ pts 32% · 2+ ast 47% · 1+ threes 45% | |||||
| Robert CowherdG | 16 | 4.7 | 1.2 | 0.5 | 1.0 |
| 5+ pts 43% · 2+ reb 32% · 1+ threes 58% | |||||
Arizona St
| Player | Min | Pts | Reb | Ast | 3s |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Paulius MurauskasF | 32 | 23.3 | 8.1 | 2.7 | 1.2 |
| 25+ pts 41% · 8+ reb 53% · 3+ ast 48% | |||||
| Dillan ShawG | 31 | 9.1 | 7.2 | 2.4 | 1.4 |
| 10+ pts 42% · 7+ reb 55% · 3+ ast 41% | |||||
| Joel FoxwellG | 30 | 13.8 | 3.7 | 7.0 | 1.9 |
| 15+ pts 41% · 4+ reb 48% · 2+ threes 52% | |||||
| JRob CroyG | 23 | 11.4 | 3.0 | 1.7 | 1.8 |
| 10+ pts 58% · 2+ ast 48% · 2+ threes 50% | |||||
| Ben DeftyC | 21 | 9.6 | 5.1 | 1.7 | 0.0 |
| 10+ pts 45% · 5+ reb 55% · 2+ ast 47% | |||||
| Bryce FordG | 18 | 8.3 | 2.0 | 0.8 | 1.3 |
| 10+ pts 36% · 2+ reb 54% · 2+ threes 36% | |||||
| Filip MalesevicC | 18 | 6.4 | 5.6 | 1.0 | 0.1 |
| 5+ pts 59% · 6+ reb 47% · 2+ ast 26% | |||||
| Emmanuel InnocentiG | 16 | 4.7 | 2.4 | 1.3 | 0.8 |
| 27% to play · 5+ pts 43% · 3+ reb 40% · 1+ threes 52% | |||||
Missed the last game: Emmanuel Innocenti (17 min a game).
Our own projections from each player's minutes and production, this opponent and the game's pace: not a sportsbook's lines. Under each name, the round numbers the player is about as likely as not to reach. How they have done
Win probability
Game chat
Loading the chat…