Who will win Temple vs La Salle?
The model gives La Salle a 61% chance to beat Temple, with a projected score of La Salle 75, Temple 72.
Half of games like thisFour in five
Calls of 60–70% have been right 64.8% of the time in 15,721 past games, and the typical miss on the margin is 8.8 points. After the final, the result is pinned to this strip. As of 2:23 AM ET on November 13, 2026. Updated three times a day until tip-off.
Players to watch
| Player | Pts | Reb | Ast | Last games | Chance of |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
 La Salle | |||||
| BurtonG · 25 min | 12.0 | 2.9 | 0.5 | 10+ 62% | |
| DockeryG · 19 min | 9.9 | 4.2 | 2.3 | 10+ 47% | |
| FinkleyF · 24 min | 8.8 | 3.8 | 2.3 | 10+ 39% | |
| BookerG · 22 min | 8.3 | 2.2 | 1.0 | 10+ 36% | |
 Temple | |||||
| FordG · 31 min | 13.5 | 3.4 | 1.9 | 15+ 40% | |
| ScottG · 28 min | 12.0 | 2.9 | 1.1 | 10+ 62% | |
| MarshG · 22 min | 8.6 | 2.6 | 2.3 | 10+ 38% | |
| GriffithsG · 30 min | 8.2 | 5.2 | 1.5 | 10+ 35% | |
Bars: points in the player's latest games this season. Blue line: tonight's projection. Every regular's line
The game without one player
Without Rob Dockery: Temple 42%La Salle 58%
The white mark is the call with him: La Salle 61%.
| Player | Points a game he adds | La Salle without him | Change | Projected score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| La Salle | ||||
| Rob Dockery | 1.0 | 58% | −3 | 73–75 |
| Kam Burton | 0.9 | 58% | −3 | 72–75 |
| Temple | ||||
| Gavin Griffiths | 0.8 | 64% | +3 | 72–76 |
| Derrian Ford | 0.7 | 64% | +3 | 72–76 |
| Jordan Marsh | 0.7 | 64% | +3 | 72–76 |
Change is in La Salle's win chance, in points. Scores read Temple, then La Salle. A player's value is what the team is better by with him than with a replacement, from the player ratings.
Model against the line
Your call
All of today's gamesPlay-by-play
Team numbers
Form
Temple 1-2WLL
- Nov 11L 81-91vs CharlestonDidn't cover +1.5 · Over 157.5
- Nov 8L 53-79vs RichmondDidn't cover +1.5 · Under 150.5
- Nov 2W 68-56vs C Connecticut
- Last 3
- 1–2, scoring 67.3 and allowing 75.3
- Against the spread, this season
- 0–2
- Totals, this season
- 1 over, 1 under
The spread and the total are the lines logged with each prediction. Form is what happened; the ratings above already count recent games more.
Offense against defense
| Temple | La Salle | |
|---|---|---|
| Points scored per 100 possessions | 102.4 209th | 102.8 203rd |
| Points allowed per 100 | 109.4 207th | 109.3 203rd |
| Possessions a game | 69.7 292nd | 70.9 171st |
| Shooting (effective field-goal %) | 47.8% 340th | 48.5% 315th |
| Opponents' shooting | 52.1% 295th | 52.3% 301st |
| Turnovers, share of possessions | 17.5% 117th | 18.6% 249th |
| Offensive rebounds, share of misses | 29.9% 288th | 34.0% 62nd |
| Free throws per shot | 0.21 356th | 0.25 227th |
First half
- Projected halftime score
- Temple 34, La Salle 35
- First-half margin
- La Salle by 1.7
- First-half points, both teams
- 69.1
- Projected second half
- Temple 38, La Salle 40
- Second-half points, both teams
- 78.2
- Tied at the half
- 4%
- Temple, first halves so far
- Led 1 of 3 · 29.0 scored, 33.0 allowed
- La Salle, first halves so far
- Led 1 of 3 · 31.0 scored, 38.7 allowed
Our own projection, not a sportsbook's first-half line. On 11,516 past games it had not seen, the halftime leader was right 67.2% of the time and the first-half total was off by 8.1 points on average. This season: 366 of 476 halftime leaders right. Scorecard
Player projections
Temple
| Player | Min | Pts | Reb | Ast | 3s |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Derrian FordG | 31 | 13.5 | 3.4 | 1.9 | 1.4 |
| 15+ pts 40% · 4+ reb 42% · 2+ ast 54% | |||||
| Gavin GriffithsG | 30 | 8.2 | 5.2 | 1.5 | 2.0 |
| 10+ pts 35% · 5+ reb 56% · 2+ threes 53% | |||||
| Cam ScottG | 28 | 12.0 | 2.9 | 1.1 | 1.6 |
| 10+ pts 62% · 3+ reb 51% · 2+ threes 45% | |||||
| Baboucarr NjieF | 23 | 6.9 | 5.3 | 1.4 | 0.2 |
| 5+ pts 64% · 5+ reb 57% · 2+ ast 40% | |||||
| Jordan MarshG | 22 | 8.6 | 2.6 | 2.3 | 1.6 |
| 10+ pts 38% · 3+ reb 45% · 2+ threes 44% | |||||
| Deuce DrakeG | 16 | 8.2 | 2.0 | 1.5 | 0.5 |
| 10+ pts 35% · 2+ reb 55% · 2+ ast 42% | |||||
| Dez WhiteG | 15 | 4.2 | 1.6 | 1.0 | 1.2 |
| 5+ pts 38% · 2+ reb 43% · 1+ threes 64% | |||||
| Dallis DillardG | 13 | 2.5 | 1.2 | 1.0 | 0.5 |
| 5+ pts 20% · 2+ reb 30% · 1+ threes 39% | |||||
La Salle
| Player | Min | Pts | Reb | Ast | 3s |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jaden JohnsonG | 29 | 5.0 | 1.9 | 4.6 | 0.5 |
| 5+ pts 46% · 2+ reb 51% · 5+ ast 47% | |||||
| Kam BurtonG | 25 | 12.0 | 2.9 | 0.5 | 3.4 |
| 10+ pts 62% · 3+ reb 51% · 4+ threes 42% | |||||
| Anthony FinkleyF | 24 | 8.8 | 3.8 | 2.3 | 1.2 |
| 10+ pts 39% · 4+ reb 50% · 3+ ast 41% | |||||
| Noah CollierF | 23 | 7.9 | 5.0 | 1.2 | 0.2 |
| 10+ pts 33% · 5+ reb 53% · 2+ ast 33% | |||||
| Devin BookerG | 22 | 8.3 | 2.2 | 1.0 | 1.3 |
| 10+ pts 36% · 2+ reb 58% · 2+ threes 37% | |||||
| Rob DockeryG | 19 | 9.9 | 4.2 | 2.3 | 0.6 |
| 10+ pts 47% · 4+ reb 55% · 1+ threes 44% | |||||
| Trey MossG | 18 | 6.0 | 2.4 | 0.8 | 1.0 |
| 5+ pts 56% · 3+ reb 41% · 1+ threes 59% | |||||
| RJ SmithG | 17 | 5.9 | 1.8 | 1.7 | 1.0 |
| 5+ pts 55% · 2+ reb 50% · 2+ ast 48% | |||||
Our own projections from each player's minutes and production, this opponent and the game's pace: not a sportsbook's lines. Under each name, the round numbers the player is about as likely as not to reach. How they have done
Win probability
Game chat
Loading the chat…