Illinois St v Santa Clara
Monday, November 23, 2026, 7:00 PM ET at Acrisure Arena. Illinois St our rank 118 · 1-2; Santa Clara our rank 75 · 4-0.
Who will win Illinois St vs Santa Clara?
The model gives Santa Clara a 70% chance to beat Illinois State, with a projected score of Santa Clara 80, Illinois St 74.
Half of games like thisFour in five
Calls of 70–80% have been right 74.5% of the time in 14,414 past games, and the typical miss on the margin is 8.8 points. After the final, the result is pinned to this strip. As of 2:23 AM ET on November 13, 2026. Updated three times a day until tip-off.
Players to watch
| Player | Pts | Reb | Ast | Last games | Chance of |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GavalyugovG · 28 min | 11.9 | 3.1 | 3.9 | 10+ 62% | |
| CastilloG · 24 min | 11.6 | 2.1 | 1.7 | 10+ 59% | |
| Longcor IIIG · 25 min | 10.8 | 3.2 | 2.3 | 10+ 54% | |
| TadjoF · 22 min | 9.4 | 5.7 | 0.8 | 10+ 44% | |
| KinzigerG · 35 min | 17.4 | 2.4 | 3.7 | 15+ 63% | |
| Messina-MooreG · 27 min | 12.9 | 2.8 | 3.1 | 15+ 36% | |
| BurchG · 23 min | 8.8 | 2.6 | 1.1 | 10+ 39% | |
| KlaboG · 26 min | 8.4 | 3.1 | 2.5 | 10+ 37% | |
Bars: points in the player's latest games this season. Blue line: tonight's projection. Every regular's line
The game without one player
Without Jake Ensminger: Illinois St 38%Santa Clara 62%
The white mark is the call with him: Santa Clara 70%.
| Player | Points a game he adds | Santa Clara without him | Change | Projected score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jake Ensminger | 2.4 | 62% | −8 | 75–79 |
| Sash Gavalyugov | 2.0 | 64% | −6 | 75–79 |
| Thierry Darlan | 1.5 | 65% | −5 | 75–79 |
| Fedor Zugic | 1.3 | 66% | −4 | 75–80 |
| Johnny Kinziger | 1.8 | 75% | +5 | 73–81 |
| Chase Walker | 1.6 | 75% | +5 | 73–81 |
| Mason Klabo | 1.3 | 74% | +4 | 74–81 |
| Malik Messina-Moore | 1.2 | 74% | +4 | 74–81 |
Change is in Santa Clara's win chance, in points. Scores read Illinois St, then Santa Clara. A player's value is what the team is better by with him than with a replacement, from the player ratings.
Model against the line
Your call
All of today's gamesPlay-by-play
Team numbers
Form
Illinois St 1-2LWL
- Nov 9L 59-76at PurdueDidn't cover +15.5 · Under 143.5
- Nov 5W 100-55vs Central State
- Nov 2L 85-90at Saint Mary's
- Last 3
- 1–2, scoring 81.3 and allowing 73.7
- Against the spread, this season
- 0–1
- Totals, this season
- 0 over, 1 under
Santa Clara 4-0WWWW
- Nov 11W 76-71at North TexasCovered −1.5 · Under 154.5
- Nov 7W 83-77vs Sacramento StDidn't cover −19.5 · Under 170.5
- Nov 4W 95-72vs MilwaukeeCovered −15.5 · Over 162.5
- Nov 2W 89-70vs Towson
- Last 4
- 4–0, scoring 85.8 and allowing 72.5
- Against the spread, this season
- 2–1
- Totals, this season
- 1 over, 2 under
The spread and the total are the lines logged with each prediction. Form is what happened; the ratings above already count recent games more.
Offense against defense
| Illinois St | Santa Clara | |
|---|---|---|
| Points scored per 100 possessions | 108.2 110th | 111.7 78th |
| Points allowed per 100 | 106.7 144th | 101.7 77th |
| Possessions a game | 69.6 302nd | 72.8 26th |
| Shooting (effective field-goal %) | 52.9% 44th | 50.7% 172nd |
| Opponents' shooting | 51.1% 228th | 48.7% 54th |
| Turnovers, share of possessions | 18.5% 229th | 18.1% 184th |
| Offensive rebounds, share of misses | 30.3% 269th | 31.9% 172nd |
| Free throws per shot | 0.25 214th | 0.24 266th |
The widest gap: Santa Clara's offense (78th) against Illinois St's defense (144th), of 365 teams.
First half
- Projected halftime score
- Illinois St 35, Santa Clara 38
- First-half margin
- Santa Clara by 3.3
- First-half points, both teams
- 72.4
- Projected second half
- Illinois St 40, Santa Clara 42
- Second-half points, both teams
- 81.9
- Tied at the half
- 4%
- Illinois St, first halves so far
- Led 2 of 3 · 41.0 scored, 32.7 allowed
- Santa Clara, first halves so far
- Led 3 of 4 · 42.0 scored, 34.8 allowed
Our own projection, not a sportsbook's first-half line. On 11,516 past games it had not seen, the halftime leader was right 67.2% of the time and the first-half total was off by 8.1 points on average. This season: 366 of 476 halftime leaders right. Scorecard
Player projections
Illinois St
| Player | Min | Pts | Reb | Ast | 3s |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Johnny KinzigerG | 35 | 17.4 | 2.4 | 3.7 | 2.4 |
| 15+ pts 63% · 3+ reb 41% · 4+ ast 48% | |||||
| Malik Messina-MooreG | 27 | 12.9 | 2.8 | 3.1 | 2.1 |
| 15+ pts 36% · 3+ reb 50% · 3+ ast 56% | |||||
| Mason KlaboG | 26 | 8.4 | 3.1 | 2.5 | 1.4 |
| 10+ pts 37% · 3+ reb 55% · 3+ ast 45% | |||||
| Demarion BurchG | 23 | 8.8 | 2.6 | 1.1 | 1.0 |
| 10+ pts 39% · 3+ reb 44% · 1+ threes 60% | |||||
| Noah ClevelandF | 23 | 7.8 | 4.8 | 1.1 | 0.2 |
| 10+ pts 32% · 5+ reb 49% · 2+ ast 29% | |||||
| Zaxton KingG | 17 | 3.9 | 1.0 | 1.1 | 0.6 |
| 5+ pts 34% · 2+ ast 28% · 1+ threes 44% | |||||
| Chase WalkerF | 15 | 8.4 | 3.4 | 1.6 | 0.3 |
| 10+ pts 36% · 4+ reb 43% · 2+ ast 44% | |||||
| Louie Semona IIIF | 14 | 2.5 | 1.8 | 0.8 | 0.5 |
| 5+ pts 19% · 2+ reb 49% · 1+ threes 39% | |||||
Santa Clara
| Player | Min | Pts | Reb | Ast | 3s |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jake EnsmingerG | 31 | 7.0 | 5.7 | 3.1 | 1.1 |
| 5+ pts 64% · 6+ reb 48% · 3+ ast 57% | |||||
| Sash GavalyugovG | 28 | 11.9 | 3.1 | 3.9 | 2.4 |
| 10+ pts 62% · 3+ reb 56% · 4+ ast 52% | |||||
| Brad Longcor IIIG | 25 | 10.8 | 3.2 | 2.3 | 1.4 |
| 10+ pts 54% · 3+ reb 57% · 3+ ast 39% | |||||
| David CastilloG | 24 | 11.6 | 2.1 | 1.7 | 2.0 |
| 10+ pts 59% · 2+ ast 48% · 2+ threes 54% | |||||
| Fedor ZugicG | 22 | 9.0 | 3.1 | 1.4 | 1.2 |
| 10+ pts 40% · 3+ reb 55% · 2+ ast 39% | |||||
| Chris TadjoF | 22 | 9.4 | 5.7 | 0.8 | 0.1 |
| 10+ pts 44% · 6+ reb 49% · 2+ ast 19% | |||||
| Elijah MahiF | 19 | 8.4 | 3.5 | 1.7 | 1.1 |
| 51% to play · 10+ pts 36% · 4+ reb 44% · 2+ ast 48% | |||||
| Thierry DarlanG | 18 | 6.0 | 4.1 | 1.6 | 1.2 |
| 5+ pts 56% · 4+ reb 54% · 2+ ast 46% | |||||
Missed the last game: Elijah Mahi (21 min a game).
Our own projections from each player's minutes and production, this opponent and the game's pace: not a sportsbook's lines. Under each name, the round numbers the player is about as likely as not to reach. How they have done
Win probability
Game chat
Loading the chat…