Alabama St at UTEP
Women's · Saturday, November 14, 2026, 3:00 PM ET at Don Haskins Center. Alabama St our rank 346 · 1-2; UTEP our rank 293 · 2-1.
Who will win Alabama St vs UTEP?
The model gives UTEP a 84% chance to beat Alabama State, with a projected score of UTEP 73, Alabama St 61.
Half of games like thisFour in five
Calls of 80–90% have been right 85.0% of the time in 7,719 past games, and the typical miss on the margin is 9.5 points. After the final, the result is pinned to this strip. As of 2:23 AM ET on November 13, 2026. Updated three times a day until tip-off.
Players to watch
| Player | Pts | Reb | Ast | Last games | Chance of |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WarrenG · 24 min | 11.2 | 2.4 | 2.7 | 10+ 57% | |
| Moses AmaniyoF · 25 min | 10.6 | 7.5 | 0.8 | 10+ 53% | |
| JoaoF · 28 min | 10.2 | 7.8 | 1.7 | 10+ 50% | |
| OlalekanF · 26 min | 9.9 | 6.4 | 1.0 | 10+ 48% | |
| WalkerG · 28 min | 9.5 | 3.0 | 1.3 | 10+ 45% | |
| PoolerF · 28 min | 9.0 | 4.1 | 1.3 | 10+ 41% | |
| SimpsonG · 21 min | 8.3 | 3.6 | 0.9 | 10+ 35% | |
| McClendonF · 27 min | 8.2 | 10.3 | 1.2 | 10+ 35% | |
Bars: points in the player's latest games this season. Blue line: tonight's projection. Every regular's line
Model against the line
Your call
All of today's gamesPlay-by-play
Team numbers
Form
Alabama St 1-2LLW
- Nov 10W 69-63vs Talladega
- Nov 7L 78-80at West Georgia
- Nov 2L 35-84at Auburn
- Last 3
- 1–2, scoring 60.7 and allowing 75.7
UTEP 2-1WWL
- Nov 10L 50-69vs New Mexico St
- Nov 7W 74-68vs Incarnate Word
- Nov 2W 100-64vs Western New Mexico
- Last 3
- 2–1, scoring 74.7 and allowing 67.0
The spread and the total are the lines logged with each prediction. Form is what happened; the ratings above already count recent games more.
Offense against defense
| Alabama St | UTEP | |
|---|---|---|
| Points scored per 100 possessions | 76.1 350th | 86.1 250th |
| Points allowed per 100 | 102.5 333rd | 102.4 329th |
| Possessions a game | 73.7 57th | 71.9 193rd |
| Shooting (effective field-goal %) | 44.2% 262nd | 43.7% 292nd |
| Opponents' shooting | 45.8% 202nd | 49.1% 347th |
| Turnovers, share of possessions | 24.9% 276th | 22.7% 109th |
| Offensive rebounds, share of misses | 34.1% 118th | 33.8% 131st |
| Free throws per shot | 0.20 272nd | 0.21 161st |
The widest gap: UTEP's offense (250th) against Alabama St's defense (333rd), of 363 teams.
First half
- Projected halftime score
- Alabama St 28, UTEP 35
- First-half margin
- UTEP by 7.1
- First-half points, both teams
- 63.4
- Projected second half
- Alabama St 33, UTEP 38
- Second-half points, both teams
- 70.3
- Tied at the half
- 4%
- Alabama St, first halves so far
- Led 0 of 3 · 27.0 scored, 37.0 allowed
- UTEP, first halves so far
- Led 2 of 3 · 35.3 scored, 32.0 allowed
Our own projection, not a sportsbook's first-half line. On 10,911 past games it had not seen, the halftime leader was right 73.0% of the time and the first-half total was off by 8.0 points on average. This season: 404 of 492 halftime leaders right. Scorecard
Player projections
Alabama St
| Player | Min | Pts | Reb | Ast | 3s |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ny'Keria FlowersG | 28 | 6.9 | 3.4 | 2.7 | 1.0 |
| 5+ pts 64% · 4+ reb 43% · 3+ ast 49% | |||||
| Londyn WalkerG | 28 | 9.5 | 3.0 | 1.3 | 1.0 |
| 10+ pts 45% · 3+ reb 53% · 1+ threes 59% | |||||
| Alanah PoolerF | 28 | 9.0 | 4.1 | 1.3 | 0.8 |
| 10+ pts 41% · 4+ reb 55% · 1+ threes 50% | |||||
| Charlese McClendonF | 27 | 8.2 | 10.3 | 1.2 | 0.3 |
| 10+ pts 35% · 11+ reb 45% · 2+ ast 33% | |||||
| Caylee SimpsonG | 21 | 8.3 | 3.6 | 0.9 | 0.5 |
| 10+ pts 35% · 4+ reb 46% · 1+ threes 40% | |||||
| Rachel GriffinF | 18 | 3.5 | 3.0 | 0.4 | 0.1 |
| 5+ pts 30% · 3+ reb 52% | |||||
| Elliott JessupF | 18 | 2.9 | 1.8 | 0.5 | 0.7 |
| 5+ pts 24% · 2+ reb 48% · 1+ threes 45% | |||||
| Takya Walters-NormanG | 11 | 3.6 | 3.5 | 0.2 | 0.1 |
| 5+ pts 31% · 4+ reb 44% | |||||
UTEP
| Player | Min | Pts | Reb | Ast | 3s |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Isabel JoaoF | 28 | 10.2 | 7.8 | 1.7 | 0.4 |
| 10+ pts 50% · 8+ reb 49% · 2+ ast 47% | |||||
| Armanda SindalawaG | 27 | 9.6 | 3.4 | 2.6 | 0.6 |
| 10+ pts 46% · 3+ ast 48% · 1+ threes 43% | |||||
| Zainab OlalekanF | 26 | 9.9 | 6.4 | 1.0 | 0.2 |
| 10+ pts 48% · 7+ reb 45% · 2+ ast 25% | |||||
| Mary Moses AmaniyoF | 25 | 10.6 | 7.5 | 0.8 | 0.2 |
| 10+ pts 53% · 8+ reb 46% · 2+ ast 18% | |||||
| Imani WarrenG | 24 | 11.2 | 2.4 | 2.7 | 0.8 |
| 10+ pts 57% · 3+ ast 49% · 1+ threes 50% | |||||
| Krista LukasevicaF | 18 | 6.7 | 3.5 | 0.9 | 0.1 |
| 5+ pts 62% · 4+ reb 45% · 2+ ast 24% | |||||
| Aolani WoldaiG | 15 | 5.1 | 2.2 | 1.2 | 0.4 |
| 5+ pts 47% · 2+ reb 60% · 2+ ast 33% | |||||
| Tatiana CollazoG | 15 | 4.0 | 1.0 | 0.7 | 0.5 |
| 5+ pts 36% · 2+ reb 26% · 1+ threes 39% | |||||
Our own projections from each player's minutes and production, this opponent and the game's pace: not a sportsbook's lines. Under each name, the round numbers the player is about as likely as not to reach. How they have done
Win probability
Game chat
Loading the chat…