William & Mary at Richmond
Women's · Sunday, November 15, 2026, 2:00 PM ET at Robins Center. William & Mary our rank 188 · 2-1; Richmond our rank 87 · 2-2.
Who will win William & Mary vs Richmond?
The model gives Richmond a 89% chance to beat William & Mary, with a projected score of Richmond 77, William & Mary 61.
Half of games like thisFour in five
Calls of 80–90% have been right 85.0% of the time in 7,719 past games, and the typical miss on the margin is 9.5 points. After the final, the result is pinned to this strip. As of 2:23 AM ET on November 13, 2026. Updated three times a day until tip-off.
Players to watch
| Player | Pts | Reb | Ast | Last games | Chance of |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SweeneyG · 35 min | 15.3 | 3.0 | 3.9 | 15+ 51% | |
| ScottG · 32 min | 13.5 | 4.5 | 3.4 | 15+ 40% | |
| PersichettiG · 32 min | 10.6 | 3.7 | 1.8 | 10+ 53% | |
| IharaF · 26 min | 9.1 | 6.1 | 2.0 | 10+ 42% | |
| GeddesG · 31 min | 14.0 | 2.7 | 1.9 | 15+ 43% | |
| DanceG · 26 min | 10.1 | 2.6 | 2.7 | 10+ 49% | |
| CarltonG · 24 min | 9.2 | 2.8 | 1.4 | 10+ 42% | |
| FoxF · 24 min | 8.5 | 7.4 | 1.2 | 10+ 37% | |
Bars: points in the player's latest games this season. Blue line: tonight's projection. Every regular's line
The game without one player
Without Ally Sweeney: William & Mary 18%Richmond 82%
The white mark is the call with her: Richmond 89%.
| Player | Points a game she adds | Richmond without her | Change | Projected score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ally Sweeney | 3.9 | 82% | −7 | 63–75 |
| Ava Persichetti | 2.7 | 85% | −4 | 62–75 |
| Aneisha Scott | 2.6 | 85% | −4 | 62–75 |
| Rayne Wright | 1.4 | 87% | −2 | 62–76 |
| Natalie Fox | 1.1 | 91% | +2 | 61–77 |
| Cassidy Geddes | 1.0 | 90% | +1 | 61–77 |
| Monet Dance | 0.9 | 90% | +1 | 61–77 |
Change is in Richmond's win chance, in points. Scores read William & Mary, then Richmond. A player's value is what the team is better by with her than with a replacement, from the player ratings.
Model against the line
Your call
All of today's gamesPlay-by-play
Team numbers
Form
William & Mary 2-1WWL
- Nov 8L 58-99at Virginia
- Nov 5W 78-54vs Tennessee St
- Nov 2W 89-48vs Chowan
- Last 3
- 2–1, scoring 75.0 and allowing 67.0
The spread and the total are the lines logged with each prediction. Form is what happened; the ratings above already count recent games more.
Offense against defense
| William & Mary | Richmond | |
|---|---|---|
| Points scored per 100 possessions | 91.0 163rd | 102.6 54th |
| Points allowed per 100 | 96.6 230th | 93.8 169th |
| Possessions a game | 71.5 225th | 69.8 345th |
| Shooting (effective field-goal %) | 45.5% 170th | 48.5% 31st |
| Opponents' shooting | 47.0% 270th | 47.5% 298th |
| Turnovers, share of possessions | 22.7% 113th | 22.9% 123rd |
| Offensive rebounds, share of misses | 35.1% 75th | 30.4% 305th |
| Free throws per shot | 0.20 268th | 0.20 268th |
The widest gap: Richmond's offense (54th) against William & Mary's defense (230th), of 363 teams.
First half
- Projected halftime score
- William & Mary 28, Richmond 37
- First-half margin
- Richmond by 8.9
- First-half points, both teams
- 65.3
- Projected second half
- William & Mary 33, Richmond 39
- Second-half points, both teams
- 72.4
- Tied at the half
- 4%
- William & Mary, first halves so far
- Led 2 of 3 · 32.0 scored, 37.0 allowed
- Richmond, first halves so far
- Led 3 of 4 · 36.2 scored, 34.0 allowed
Our own projection, not a sportsbook's first-half line. On 10,911 past games it had not seen, the halftime leader was right 73.0% of the time and the first-half total was off by 8.0 points on average. This season: 404 of 492 halftime leaders right. Scorecard
Player projections
William & Mary
| Player | Min | Pts | Reb | Ast | 3s |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cassidy GeddesG | 31 | 14.0 | 2.7 | 1.9 | 1.5 |
| 15+ pts 43% · 3+ reb 46% · 2+ ast 54% | |||||
| Monet DanceG | 26 | 10.1 | 2.6 | 2.7 | 1.4 |
| 10+ pts 49% · 3+ reb 45% · 3+ ast 48% | |||||
| Natalie FoxF | 24 | 8.5 | 7.4 | 1.2 | 0.1 |
| 10+ pts 37% · 8+ reb 44% · 2+ ast 31% | |||||
| Denver CarltonG | 24 | 9.2 | 2.8 | 1.4 | 1.0 |
| 10+ pts 42% · 3+ reb 50% · 1+ threes 58% | |||||
| Skyla MastronardiG | 22 | 6.3 | 3.0 | 1.8 | 1.0 |
| 5+ pts 59% · 3+ reb 53% · 2+ ast 52% | |||||
| Marley LongF | 21 | 3.5 | 4.3 | 1.0 | 0.4 |
| 5+ pts 30% · 4+ reb 57% · 1+ threes 30% | |||||
| Sophia LeGoullonG | 19 | 2.9 | 2.8 | 0.5 | 0.5 |
| 5+ pts 24% · 3+ reb 50% · 1+ threes 36% | |||||
| Ari MercadoG | 17 | 3.6 | 1.6 | 0.9 | 0.4 |
| 5+ pts 32% · 2+ reb 43% · 1+ threes 31% | |||||
Richmond
| Player | Min | Pts | Reb | Ast | 3s |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ally SweeneyG | 35 | 15.3 | 3.0 | 3.9 | 1.7 |
| 15+ pts 51% · 3+ reb 54% · 4+ ast 52% | |||||
| Ava PersichettiG | 32 | 10.6 | 3.7 | 1.8 | 1.7 |
| 10+ pts 53% · 4+ reb 47% · 2+ ast 51% | |||||
| Aneisha ScottG | 32 | 13.5 | 4.5 | 3.4 | 0.8 |
| 15+ pts 40% · 5+ reb 45% · 1+ threes 50% | |||||
| Arisa IharaF | 26 | 9.1 | 6.1 | 2.0 | 0.5 |
| 10+ pts 42% · 6+ reb 53% · 2+ ast 57% | |||||
| Josie FontanaF | 26 | 8.0 | 7.2 | 1.7 | 0.7 |
| 10+ pts 34% · 2+ ast 47% · 1+ threes 48% | |||||
| Rayne WrightG | 14 | 4.7 | 1.9 | 0.9 | 0.3 |
| 5+ pts 43% · 2+ reb 52% · 1+ threes 25% | |||||
| Emma SchoenG | 11 | 3.2 | 1.3 | 0.6 | 0.5 |
| 5+ pts 27% · 2+ reb 36% · 1+ threes 36% | |||||
| Shaneka CampbellF | 10 | 1.8 | 2.0 | 0.3 | 0.1 |
| 2+ reb 53% | |||||
Our own projections from each player's minutes and production, this opponent and the game's pace: not a sportsbook's lines. Under each name, the round numbers the player is about as likely as not to reach. How they have done
Win probability
Game chat
Loading the chat…